How did this team not win anything

fergies coat

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
2,800
Location
Wythenshawe, Manchester

I've just seen this on twitter. It was the team the played Switzerland in euro 2004. How did we not win anything?

It was probably our best tournament under Sven, and maybe we could of won it if Rooney didn't get injured against Portugal.

Look at that formation. Players just shoehorned into a 442. What was Sven thinking? Could you imagine what Pep, Klopp or Sir Alex could of done with this lot.
 

The Mitcher

connoisseur of pot noodles and sandwiches
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
19,645
Location
Manchester

I've just seen this on twitter. It was the team the played Switzerland in euro 2004. How did we not win anything?

It was probably our best tournament under Sven, and maybe we could of won it if Rooney didn't get injured against Portugal.

Look at that formation. Players just shoehorned into a 442. What was Sven thinking? Could you imagine what Pep, Klopp or Sir Alex could of done with this lot.
You answered your own question there.

Also, playing Scholes out of position, playing Lampard and Gerrard together when they did not fit as a pair, and also James was an awful goalkeeper.
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
86,704
Rooney getting injured fecked us over. He started that tournament in amazing form.
 

Vidyoyo

The bad "V"
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
21,390
Location
Not into locations = will not dwell
Am I right in thinking Owen was a worse player by 2004? That was the year he went to Real and he did okay but he only lasted a season before returning to Newcastle.

Edit: Actually he'd finished strongly that year for Pool so perhaps not.
 

VidaRed

Unimaginative FC
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
29,612
Axe lampard and play gerrard and schole in the middle. Throw in a defensive midfielder like fred behind them and rooney infront.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
You answered your own question there.

Also, playing Scholes out of position, playing Lampard and Gerrard together when they did not fit as a pair, and also James was an awful goalkeeper.
This
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
Scholes shoved out on the wing, lack of balance, lack of pace at the back, lack of out ball at the top.
This team is full of individuals but never a team.
English fans love to harp on about the golden generation when the reality is there never was one.
 

Apokalips

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
869
Axe lampard and play gerrard and schole in the middle. Throw in a defensive midfielder like fred behind them and rooney infront.
You could have mentioned anyone in history and you chose Fred? Joker
 

Mb194dc

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
4,687
Supports
Chelsea
How:


When I wonder why I have so little hope or faith in England... Just need go watch last 20 years of tournaments. Would have had Greece in second round if topped the group. Maybe would have been different...
 

432JuanMata

Full Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Messages
3,097
Location
Dublin
A lack of of a DM screwed that team as well. The midfield was just picked of the best players instead of finding the right balance. Also only 1 country can win things
 

Renegade

Full Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
5,393
Hargreaves and even P Neville on the bench could have been a DM option. I remember SAF playing Neville in midfield more frequently around that timeframe. Butt was in the squad too but think he was slowing down around that time.

I think the narrative around this time was that Gerrard was this complete CM that could cover for Lampard defensively. Persisting with the Lampard/Gerrard formula was unforgivable in 2006 though.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,352
Location
The Arena of the Unwell

I've just seen this on twitter. It was the team the played Switzerland in euro 2004. How did we not win anything?

It was probably our best tournament under Sven, and maybe we could of won it if Rooney didn't get injured against Portugal.

Look at that formation. Players just shoehorned into a 442. What was Sven thinking? Could you imagine what Pep, Klopp or Sir Alex could of done with this lot.
It's just ridiculous. Even swapping Scholes and Gerrard would have been a massive improvement.

Lampard/Gerrard isn't even half a midfield. Either of them could have been an integral part of the team but not as CMs.
 

GlasgowCeltic

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
5,370
The midfield issues are mentioned often but I think Sven also had the team sitting camped behind the ball too often
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,324
Location
Blitztown
Axe lampard and play gerrard and schole in the middle. Throw in a defensive midfielder like fred behind them and rooney infront.
Fred was only 11 in 2004. Also Brazilian so couldn’t have played even if old enough.
 

OleBoiii

New Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
6,021
I've seen that picture(or similar ones) so many times now.

You could whine about injuries and Scholes being out of position all you want, but the truth is that most teams only last 3-4 years. That only gives the team in question 1 or 2 chances to win something. And cups are volatile by nature.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,291
Wrong manager, wrong formation, no balance to the team, he played players out of position because tried to fit all his best players into the starting 11.
 

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,305
Supports
Aston Villa
Axe lampard and play gerrard and schole in the middle. Throw in a defensive midfielder like fred behind them and rooney infront.
Hargreaves was in squad in 2004 but played more wide in those times before having a good world cup in 2006.

By 2006 England were playing some terrible football.

Actually thought the best chance of the three was 2002. 1 up by Brazil and team froze. Win that and path would've been Turkey in SF and Germany in final with the 5-1 happening less than a year before so would've been a better opportunity than what presented itself in 2018.
 

Irwin99

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
9,435
Bit of a galactico policy of 'let's just throw superstars in there and let them get on with it' instead of a balanced team. In fairness it still could have won in 2004.

Lack of a pacy, direct winger and a midfield that could control games are the biggest issues beside the goalkeeper. Scholes didn't actually perform that deeper role at that point (we still had Keane doing that for United) and I can't think of another player other than Hargreaves maybe that might have done the job at that point.

A pretty unlikable team too. Think even Scholes said at the time it was a pretty divided squad and some of the players didn't get on.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,352
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
Main issue was Sven.

He was not a good manager and square-peg-round-holed it for no apparent reason. If he had Scholes/Hargreaves with Gerrard and Rooney ahead of them and the option to bring Lampard and Owen off the bench towards the end other teams would be sh*tting themselves.
 

Eli Zee

Full Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
1,063
Scholes shoved out on the wing, lack of balance, lack of pace at the back, lack of out ball at the top.
This team is full of individuals but never a team.
English fans love to harp on about the golden generation when the reality is there never was one.
Golden generation, just mismanaged? Can't deny the talent of this generation
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
Golden generation, just mismanaged? Can't deny the talent of this generation
Campbell, Cole, Lampard, Terry...all massively overrated.
Mismanaged undoubtedly, but over hyped even still.
 

Pscholes18

Full Member
Joined
Jul 21, 1999
Messages
8,343
Location
Fresno, CA

I've just seen this on twitter. It was the team the played Switzerland in euro 2004. How did we not win anything?

It was probably our best tournament under Sven, and maybe we could of won it if Rooney didn't get injured against Portugal.

Look at that formation. Players just shoehorned into a 442. What was Sven thinking? Could you imagine what Pep, Klopp or Sir Alex could of done with this lot.
Because you have two cnuts playing inth middle that shouldn't of been playing together forcing Scholes on the wing.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
Campbell, Cole, Lampard, Terry...all massively overrated.
Mismanaged undoubtedly, but over hyped even still.
I’d disagree Cole, Lampard and Terry were class. Ashley probably the best left back in the world.
 

Wayne's World

Full Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2010
Messages
9,308
Location
Ireland
I remember 2004, I was only young at the time but that England team were very impressive with a young Wayne Rooney bursting onto the scene but at that time from what I recall, England has this obsession of playing 4-4-2 and wouldn't change it so left it with Lampard and Gerrard in the middle when both weren't suited to it.

Football changed so much since then that managers would definitely accommodate that now to get the best of them but back then, it was 4-4-2 and that was it and wasn't going to be changed to get the best out of players
 

padr81

Full Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
11,987
Supports
Man City
That team had no wingers and was over stacked with CMS.

Needed to bench Stevie and Owen. Play Scholes and Lampard ahead of Barry and a real winger on the left which they didn't have.
 

paulscholes18

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
20,222
Every man and his dog could see Lampard and Gerrard couldn’t work together in a two, and to top it of Scholes got shoved to LW.
Had the midfield and forward line been
Beckham Hargreaves Scholes Cole
Lampard/ Gerrard
Owen/ Rooney

Then maybe 2004 would have been different.