gajender
Full Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2016
- Messages
- 3,918
They Pulled the same stunt when Pl was created by separating Division 1 from rest of the football Pyramid and negotiating their own TV deals.I was completely against it on the grounds of a lack of meritocracy and would've hated seeing my club play in a competition that is 75% closed. But having said that, I also believe most if not all of the rest of the 14 teams would've done the same if the opportunity presented itself. Below is a great piece by Brian Reade on the hypocrisy of the Governing bodies, Sky, BT and the rest of the 14.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Brian Reade: "The 14 Premier League clubs who didn't get the ESL invite have been rightly scathing about the Greedy Six, yet they voted to keep 93% of the current £8.65 billion TV deals that are in place, allowing little to trickle down the football pyramid they now claim to be so concerned about. It's why the grassroots game is on its knees".
Mate it's all hypocrisy and self preservation nothing more ,you can actually see it on here as well for all the talk of Sporting Merit and how this would kill football at Grassroots news flash it's already dying and not many cared about it or talked about it prior to this Super League announcements now suddenly all of us wants to Guardians of this beautiful game. PL riches have created an uneven field already and but these greedy Owners just went one step too far.