Is Gareth Southgate a shiite England manager?

Mb194dc

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
4,675
Supports
Chelsea
Do you guys believe that Didier Deschamps is better than Southgate? Would you be happy if England hired Deschamps in the future? Say, two months from now.

What about Fernando Santos? Portugal won a Euro, England has never done it.
Yes obviously Deschamps is a better manager than Southgate... He's won big trophies in club football as a player and a manager and obviously in the international game as well.

England aren't going to hire a French manager... Probably... If there was an English manager with such a record, sign him up. Southgate is probably the best England have got, has won absolutely nothing, which is absolutely pitiful for a country with a big football pedigree.
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
13,949
Location
Sunny Manc
People who say England should keep Southgate have one trait in common with him. They are so risk-averse that it's ridiculous. Humanity would still have been in dark ages had we not had individuals who were willing to dip into the unknown.
Perhaps we should all be a bit more like this guy
 

Reapersoul20

Can Anderson score? No.
Joined
Aug 13, 2006
Messages
12,155
Location
Jog on
Ole, Stevie G, Harry Redknapp, Mourinho, Sean Dyche...


Yes obviously Deschamps is a better manager than Southgate... He's won big trophies in club football as a player and a manager and obviously in the international game as well.

England aren't going to hire a French manager... Probably... If there was an English manager with such a record, sign him up. Southgate is probably the best England have got, has won absolutely nothing, which is absolutely pitiful for a country with a big football pedigree.
Does it though? As you say, England has never really done it on the world-stage. I'd say there's more of a pedigree of choking. The Spurs of international football.
 

Bosnian_fan

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2018
Messages
713
Supports
Sarajevo
Perhaps it is time to part with Southgate and try their luck with another manager. Perhaps England should keep Southgate for 2 more years. I have no idea what the best decision is in this case. Perhaps these loses are weighting a lot on him, and he will resign anyway, who knows?

But either way, for many of us, the non-English people like me (and the majority of the 7 billion on this earth are not English!) ... Southgate has been a good manager for England. Much better than the previous managers England had in the past 30 years that I am watching them. And he seems a nice guy too. I do not understand why people are so harsh to him. It is different to say '"it is time we try something else", and it is very different to say "Southgate is shiite".
But isn't the point to strive for better? I mean, I simply can't understand the reasoning that if you have Tuchel available and willing to take over, you still persist with Southgate. Of course, Southgate may turn out to be better fit for England than Tuchel, Pochettino, or any other names that have been mentioned, but I'm pretty confident England would never win anything with Southgate, and they do have the squad that should reasonably be expected to win at some point.

The way I see it, I'd rather risk it with someone else.
 

Pintu

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
4,205
Location
Sweden
People who say England should keep Southgate have one trait in common with him. They are so risk-averse that it's ridiculous. Humanity would still have been in dark ages had we not had individuals who were willing to dip into the unknown.
I do respect this opinion. You’re absolutely right, you gotta take risks to get some reward. But that also means you run bigger risk of missing the KO stages. I just don’t like people pretending that some random other manager would have won England a major trophy by now. There are no guaranties in international football. It can be like the CL eluding some very good teams no matter what…
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,195
Location
Cooper Station
Do you know the way non English folks say the media and fans overrate their own players …
Look at the starting XI of each side from the other night and a lot of players are very debatable if you're making a combined team, hence the difference in quality being not too great.
 

RacingClub

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2021
Messages
2,050
Supports
Racing Club
Look at the starting XI of each side from the other night and a lot of players are very debatable if you're making a combined team
Yup you could make a case for Kane over Giroud, Bellingham over Rabiot, Shaw over Hernandez, Walker over Kounde , Pickford over Lloris and maybe even Saka over Dembele.

It's not like it was vs the strongest french team possible.
 

Bepi

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
3,875
Location
Italy
Supports
Juventus
Yup you could make a case for Kane over Giroud, Bellingham over Rabiot, Shaw over Hernandez, Walker over Kounde , Pickford over Lloris and maybe even Saka over Dembele.

It's not like it was vs the strongest french team possible.
If you want more driving force and intangibles, Henderson gets a place over Rabiot and that’s it imho.
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,307
I do respect this opinion. You’re absolutely right, you gotta take risks to get some reward. But that also means you run bigger risk of missing the KO stages. I just don’t like people pretending that some random other manager would have won England a major trophy by now. There are no guaranties in international football. It can be like the CL eluding some very good teams no matter what…
I guess the opposite of risk-averse is reckless, and that is equally as dangerous, particularly so when we are not desperate for change.

There are obviously many more talented and experienced coaches out there than Southgate in world football, and many of those would leap at the opportunity, but that doesnt mean they are going to be better at this job. Too many people look only at on-pitch scenarios, and give little thought to what else it must take to not only be a mature face of English football but also to deliver a squad not loaded with pressure and the weight of consistent failure.

The very notable and most overlooked thing that Southgate has achieved is that he has reduced the doubters down to arguing about things that can't be misproven. Starting XIs, choice of subs, timing of subs. All very safe spaces for the armchair expert. The comfort blanket of never being proven wrong. Everybody can feel smug that, had the 'if only' they wanted to happen would have happened, it would surely have turned out well. Its universal.

For the record i do feel its time for a change, and i do see Southgate resigning in the next couple of months. Having said that, I also feel that its FAR from a guarantee that this will be a positive. Ask Sven or Capello or Hoddle or Venables how difficult it is to stop this whole thing from becoming a circus, and ask ourselves whether we want that back.

My choice is Pochettino. He's probably a better coach than Southgate but crucially IMO also the most likely personality to 'get' this job in its entirety. Likeable enough to get respect from the players (for the right reasons), talented enough to maybe squeeze that extra 5% through his ideas, but also humble enough to recognise and continue the work that Southgate has put in everywhere else.
 

InspiRED

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
1,608
Supports
Outraged snowflakes
Do you know the way non English folks say the media and fans overrate their own players …
Not really. Some of you say that. Many don’t. Don’t think you can really claim it as the consensus opinion but I imagine that won’t deter you as you seem pretty invested in it. Most England fans seem to have a good understanding of the teams strengths and weaknesses and relative standing. Take the wc2018 pretty much no England fan rated the team as anything beyond good. This squad is very good, it’s self evident.
 

InspiRED

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
1,608
Supports
Outraged snowflakes
I guess the opposite of risk-averse is reckless, and that is equally as dangerous, particularly so when we are not desperate for change.

There are obviously many more talented and experienced coaches out there than Southgate in world football, and many of those would leap at the opportunity, but that doesnt mean they are going to be better at this job. Too many people look only at on-pitch scenarios, and give little thought to what else it must take to not only be a mature face of English football but also to deliver a squad not loaded with pressure and the weight of consistent failure.

The very notable and most overlooked thing that Southgate has achieved is that he has reduced the doubters down to arguing about things that can't be misproven. Starting XIs, choice of subs, timing of subs. All very safe spaces for the armchair expert. The comfort blanket of never being proven wrong. Everybody can feel smug that, had the 'if only' they wanted to happen would have happened, it would surely have turned out well. Its universal.

For the record i do feel its time for a change, and i do see Southgate resigning in the next couple of months. Having said that, I also feel that its FAR from a guarantee that this will be a positive. Ask Sven or Capello or Hoddle or Venables how difficult it is to stop this whole thing from becoming a circus, and ask ourselves whether we want that back.

My choice is Pochettino. He's probably a better coach than Southgate but crucially IMO also the most likely personality to 'get' this job in its entirety. Likeable enough to get respect from the players (for the right reasons), talented enough to maybe squeeze that extra 5% through his ideas, but also humble enough to recognise and continue the work that Southgate has put in everywhere else.
What exactly were you expecting on a football forum? People just to say the things that you deem to be acceptable and correct?

conjecture about teams and tactics? how dare they?!
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,307
What exactly were you expecting on a football forum? People just to say the things that you deem to be acceptable and correct?

conjecture about teams and tactics? how dare they?!
The point is its always a safe space. We're all guilty of it. Don't you believe without doubt that if Southgate had played your team and made your subs then we'd have won the game?
 

scottser

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 23, 2022
Messages
569
I think the mood around the England team has changed from righteous indignation and their inevitable failure to one of satisfaction with their consistently decent performances. Southgate has brought a maturity and reasonableness to fans expectations but there's still a capacity to win a trophy there for sure.
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
5,082
Would stevie g be an upgrade? In terms of player and manager honours along with his status in the English game he tops southgate, problem with him is he would obviously favour liverpool players
 

InspiRED

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
1,608
Supports
Outraged snowflakes
The point is its always a safe space. We're all guilty of it. Don't you believe without doubt that if Southgate had played your team and made your subs then we'd have won the game?
I actually don’t no, they could have made those changes and still lost. I believe that if he had made those changes there would have been a better chance of progressing yes. I don’t know, who knows? But there seems to be plenty of people with similar views and I don’t really buy it that they think that way because they are just deluded or entitled. It seems an unnecessary slander to bring into a debate. Personally I’d rather hear it explained why say Sterling was the likely right choice at that moment or some other decision or choice that’s contested.
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,307
I actually don’t no, they could have made those changes and still lost. I believe that if he had made those changes there would have been a better chance of progressing yes. I don’t know, who knows? But there seems to be plenty of people with similar views and I don’t really buy it that they think that way because they are just deluded or entitled. It seems an unnecessary slander to bring into a debate. Personally I’d rather hear it explained why say Sterling was the likely right choice at that moment or some other decision or choice that’s contested.
I never used either word. Deluded or entitled? I fear you missed the point
 

CM

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
7,401
Would stevie g be an upgrade? In terms of player and manager honours along with his status in the English game he tops southgate, problem with him is he would obviously favour liverpool players
No chance. I don't rate Southgate much as a tactician, but one thing he did get pretty much on point is his handling of the players and the media. Look at the ruckus Gerrard caused at Villa with the captain situation, by comparison.

If Southgate's stint does end here, there has to be far more inspiring options available than Steven Gerrard. That link must honestly be a piss take :lol:
 

InspiRED

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
1,608
Supports
Outraged snowflakes
I never used either word. Deluded or entitled? I fear you missed the point
Maybe. ‘Armchair expert’ certainly sounds like a definition of a deluded person if you ask me.

anyway we both agree it’s maybe time to see what a new manager could do so we agree sort of.
 

Reapersoul20

Can Anderson score? No.
Joined
Aug 13, 2006
Messages
12,155
Location
Jog on
No one has answered this question.

Who would you like to replace Southgate?
:lol:

I'd say if you got 100 people randomly off the street about 70 of them would be far better than Southgate.

Actually, sorry I forgot he is GOATed and should be given a contract extension.

This is what it must have felt like to be a Liverpool fan when Ole was at the wheel.
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,714
If you are being unkind, GS benefited from an extremely kind draw in 2018. In 2021 he had home advantage. In 2022 he achieved par England performance. You can make the statistical case for him being average but it's easier to say he's performed higher than expectations whether by luck or not. And yet France didn't look that much better - only a little. Mbappe was the main difference really.

All of that overlooks that England do look better than ten years ago. But they also don't look like winners. That's what it boils down to. Better but not winners. For that reason I guess Tuchel is the obvious choice of the names being thrown around.

End of the day the players lack self belief. Can the manager fix that? Not sure.
 
Last edited:

Doracle

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,018
Do you know the way non English folks say the media and fans overrate their own players …
But England completely outplayed France. On a normal day it’s probably 2-0 or 3-1 on the balance of play. There surely can’t be any doubt about that? So do you think Southgate is a tactical genius?
 

Doracle

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,018
Look at the starting XI of each side from the other night and a lot of players are very debatable if you're making a combined team, hence the difference in quality being not too great.
I think most people would have 6 or 7 England players in a combined team - Pickford, Walker, Maguire or Stones, Shaw, Bellingham, Kane and Saka significantly outperformed their counterparts.

Obviously it’s a lot closer with the likes of Pogba, Kante and Benzema fit, which is why it was a particularly irritating defeat.
 

Reditus

Lineup Prediction League Winner 2021-22
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Messages
5,583
But England completely outplayed France. On a normal day it’s probably 2-0 or 3-1 on the balance of play. There surely can’t be any doubt about that? So do you think Southgate is a tactical genius?
No I think he did well with the players he had over the years. Overachieved in 2018 and to an extent 2021. Went out at the quarters this year which is their level.

I also don’t think we watched the same game in Saturday. It was a close game. England did well but not even close to completely outplayed
 

Doracle

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,018
No I think he did well with the players he had over the years. Overachieved in 2018 and to an extent 2021. Went out at the quarters this year which is their level.

I also don’t think we watched the same game in Saturday. It was a close game. England did well but not even close to completely outplayed
It was a reasonable close game in the grand scheme of things but bearing in mind it was probably the two best sides in the tournament facing off, it was far more one-sided than I expected. After the first 20 minutes, the left side of France’s defence spent the entire match resorting to desperate fouls and France created very little.

I don’t think this England squad is quite as good (yet) as some people are suggesting but I think it was still the best squad in a slightly weak tournament. It’s a great chance missed.
 

apotheosis

O'Fortuna
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
5,234
Location
waiting for everyone else to catch up!!
End of the day the players lack self belief. Can the manager fix that? Not sure.
I think the players level of belief stems firstly from the manager. The manager has to be first to show belief, and by not utilising our attacking options in an attempt to win these matches simply sends the wrong message for me.

Lack of faith, courage, whatever u want to call it. He just doesn't seem willing to risk making positive changes when it really matters.
 
Last edited:

colombianmancunian

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 26, 2022
Messages
732
He is as mediocre as a coach as Memphis is mediocre as a player. You could do better than him, Tuchel is available FFS.
 

Jam

Full Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Messages
1,157
He is as mediocre as a coach as Memphis is mediocre as a player. You could do better than him, Tuchel is available FFS.
I don’t think Tuchel is particularly suited for international management. Good manager, but international is almost a very different role to club level. I mean I wouldn’t say no to it.

Even if we looked at English managers. I rate Potter above Howe, but think Howe would do better with England.

Ancelotti with Brazil is a very worrying prospect; think it would suit him very well.
 

Jam

Full Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Messages
1,157
I think most people would have 6 or 7 England players in a combined team - Pickford, Walker, Maguire or Stones, Shaw, Bellingham, Kane and Saka significantly outperformed their counterparts.

Obviously it’s a lot closer with the likes of Pogba, Kante and Benzema fit, which is why it was a particularly irritating defeat.
Pickford, Walker, Stones, Maguire, Shaw; Henderson, Rice, Bellingham; Saka, Kane, Foden.

Lloris, Kounde, Upamecano, Varane, T. Hernandez; Tchouameni, Rabiot; Dembele, Griezmann, Mbappe; Giroud.

If you were making a combined team of those starting XIs for a match on the same day…. on paper realistically you’d consider Walker, Rice, Bellingham, Kane and Foden. I wouldn’t say it is a sure thing most people would pick 6-7 England players. At best five get in, and even then it’s debatably less.
 

Gums

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2021
Messages
248
Creating a group that are capable of going deep into tournaments consistently.
I disagree with your going deep into tournaments consistently statement. Of his three tournaments, he went deep twice. And one of those was effectively a home tournament. England has gone deep in both of our other home tournaments, so I don’t think Southgate managed anything exceptional in 2020. I think the credit belongs to the home supporters first and foremost.

I’m not saying he’s shit. He’s not, but I think he has peaked.
 

reelworld

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2001
Messages
8,767
Location
Mexico City, Mexico
I disagree with your going deep into tournaments consistently statement. Of his three tournaments, he went deep twice. And one of those was effectively a home tournament. England has gone deep in both of our other home tournaments, so I don’t think Southgate managed anything exceptional in 2020. I think the credit belongs to the home supporters first and foremost.

I’m not saying he’s shit. He’s not, but I think he has peaked.
Exactly.
I think Southgate has done really well to bring the unity so lacked in the England squad in previous teams. He's also done the best on getting the media on his side, which is no easy thing to do.
But England won't win anything with him as manager. He did well to raise the floor of this England team, now for the FA could find someone who could bring that extra 5% to go all the way
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,827
He will stay for the Euros in 18 months because England is now the PC capital of the world and Gareth is a lovely individual and has done very well and just been unlucky .. fine margins and all that ( Ole said that a lot too ).

In 18 months, the same scenario will play out and England will lose against the first decent side they face in the knockout stage.

England have become so good at failure they are now describing it as a success.

Southgate has had everything a manager would need to win a major tournament, ie good draw / fixtures etc / great squad options but his in game management has cost England every time.

How anyone defends him is beyond me .. good bloke but not a good manager of games.

As the saying goes .. if you do tomorrow what you did today, you will get tomorrow what you got today.

I hope he does the right thing and steps down.
I am praying he calls it a day,however fear he won't because no English options available to take the job
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,827
Definetly postives to take from the game but I do think England were very cautious and how fecking slow they pass around even when there wasn't long left and they're chasing a lead. pass back,sideways.

Send Maguire up top & fecking hoof it.

That's his biggest weakness, his inability to change things up & make effective subs at the right time.. it has cost England in every tournament.

His bench is one of the best in the tournament, really underused Rashford who actually is playing well & was joint top scorer with Saka for England despite playing the least of all the main attacking players?

Instead he brings on Sterling, who missed most of the week (rightly so) right that's going to terrify France.. bring on someone that's focus is on home. It's not a fecking testimonial for fecksake.
Yeah the inability to change and make effective subs at the right time issues need drilling into the heads of Southgate FC
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,756
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
He knows full well he’s staying on. This is just the little song and dance he does to maintain his curated considerate and thoughtful manager facade.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,827
... to be clear, my question assumes Southgate leaves in the next few weeks.
OK will give you a couple of options but none English because either unsuitable or still in jobs

Pochettino

Tuchel

There has also been a suggestion that Deschamps could be replaced by Zidane after the World Cup.

Yes I would like to see either Howe or Potter get it,however I like said above neither will leave their current club roles.