horsechoker
The Caf's Roy Keane.
It may seem silly to cry about but if we think of a throw-in as a minor punishment for your player making the ball go out of play then is it fair when the team in possession must carefully defend the ball as to not concede a goal?
Although at the highest level this shouldn't be a problem for a team, it does fail to punish the team that puts the ball out, there's a big difference between conceding a goal kick and conceding a throw-in near the box you're attacking.
Most players aren't Rory DELAP and can't launch the ball a good half mile, so instead, if the ball goes out of play should it not be a free-kick to the other team?
I think this would be fairer.
Although I'm right feel free to argue against me.
Although at the highest level this shouldn't be a problem for a team, it does fail to punish the team that puts the ball out, there's a big difference between conceding a goal kick and conceding a throw-in near the box you're attacking.
Most players aren't Rory DELAP and can't launch the ball a good half mile, so instead, if the ball goes out of play should it not be a free-kick to the other team?
I think this would be fairer.
Although I'm right feel free to argue against me.