Is Jadon Sancho really worth the 100 plus million fee?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
I'm not saying they're not the weakest link, but similarly Henderson and Wijnaldum are the weakest links in that Liverpool (full strength) side. I think we're evolving finally having an attack that moves, ie runs in behind and not static as feck. Everyone is starting to take heed and we're improving across the front line. I then see the issue stemming that like with Leeds, you take out Bruno, the creativity is gone. I don't think Pogba is anywhere close to a true creative attacking midfielder, so having Bruno + Sancho would be far better than sacrificing our defensive solidity at the base of midfield.

I don't think the player we would both want to replace either fred or mctominay exists right now.
Why do you keep leaving Fabinho out? He's their #6, Wijnaldum played as the AM like Bruno, and the first thing Klopp did when he got the chance was bring Thiago in to add quality in midfield. Henderson isn’t a great player but he's much better than either of McFred who aren't even that solid defensively, they run around a lot but lose opposition runners frequently. As far as Pogba goes, I take it you want to sell him?

Rice/Bentancur and Camavinga/Neuhaus in for McFred is an easy big upgrade.
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,083
The 2 I've bolded are the only 2 that would work in the PL, the rest would get ran through, even Guardiola has stopped with the 2 AM's ahead of the holder, Pogba is no Gundogan when it comes to covering ground which is vital, Pogba should be factored into the front 4 options rather than the midfield pivot options imo, and these days it seems Ole has realized as well. Rice is good at what he does but he's not Superman and I don't think Fred or Van de Beek are the answer as his partner.
As I said in the edit, Pogba can work in a midfield three if you pair him with two work horses/defensive players. What's the difference in playing Pogba - Fred - Rice to Pogba - Herrera - Matic that worked well in Ole's interim days.

Bruno - VdB - Rice midfield can also be used at the very least against easy opponents. This midfield three has similar skillset to De Bruyne - Silva - Fernandinho which has worked for City several times.
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
As I said in the edit, Pogba can work in a midfield three if you pair him with two work horses/defensive players. What's the difference in playing Pogba - Fred - Rice to Pogba - Herrera - Matic that worked well in Ole's interim days.

Bruno - VdB - Rice midfield can also be used at the very least against easy opponents. This midfield three has similar skillset to De Bruyne - Silva - Fernandinho which has worked for City several times.
Where does Bruno play in that midfield? We play 4-3-2-1, it's the only way to get Pogba and Bruno into the side and that is surely paramount.

David Silva is levels above Van de Beek mate, and there are no easy opponents in the PL, even the lower half teams will press you and get about your midfield. There's a reason Guardiola always has 2 of Fernandinho/Rodri/Gundogan in midfield these days and plays Foden wide, without a Silva type you can't get away with such a weak midfield in the PL.
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,083
Where does Bruno play in that midfield? We play 4-3-2-1, it's the only way to get Pogba and Bruno into the side and that is surely paramount.
Bruno does not play. Maybe he's injured or resting. But if he's unavailable that midfield is still functional

David Silva is levels above Van de Beek mate, and there are no easy opponents in the PL, even the lower half teams will press you and get about your midfield. There's a reason Guardiola always has 2 of Fernandinho/Rodri/Gundogan in midfield these days and plays Foden wide, without a Silva type you can't get away with such a weak midfield in the PL.
Of course Silva is better than VdB. I'm not comparing their quality but what they would offer. VdB - Bruno - Rice all have the skillet to be used in the same way Silva - De Bruyne - Fernandinho were used. And yes there are weak teams in the Pl.

How exactly did Silva stop City from having a defensively weak midfield
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
Bruno does not play. Maybe he's injured or resting. But if he's unavailable that midfield is still functional


Of course Silva is better than VdB. I'm not comparing their quality but what they would offer. VdB - Bruno - Rice all have the skillet to be used in the same way Silva - De Bruyne - Fernandinho were used. And yes there are weak teams in the Pl.

How exactly did Silva stop City from having a defensively weak midfield
Bruno hardly ever misses a game, the team needs to include a double pivot with Bruno and Pogba at AM/LW respectively to make sense for us.

I don't see Van de Beek working in that system like you do mate, Silva was a maestro, you can be defensively good by keeping the ball, moving your tewm around and running the opposition out chasing shadows, he basically operated the same way Iniesta did for Pep at Barca, Van de Beek isn't that player, h'es a quick give and go type, not a controller, he has very different attributes, the likes of Silva and Iniesta are the exception rather than the rule.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,121
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Why do you keep leaving Fabinho out? He's their #6, Wijnaldum played as the AM like Bruno, and the first thing Klopp did when he got the chance was bring Thiago in to add quality in midfield. Henderson isn’t a great player but he's much better than either of McFred who aren't even that solid defensively, they run around a lot but lose opposition runners frequently. As far as Pogba goes, I take it you want to sell him?

Rice/Bentancur and Camavinga/Neuhaus in for McFred is an easy big upgrade.
Because we play with a front 4 with Bruno, not a front 3 like Liverpool.

I do think we should sell Pogba, but not because he isn't world class, just we can't fit him in our team with Bruno.

I've had this argument in the Rice thread, but Rice puts up pretty much the same numbers as Fred, so I don't see how it's a big upgrade - Bentancur I take your point, but don't know if he would translate into the prem. Camavinga? He's had a very average season and is just a kid. I couldn't comment on Neuhaus, not seen enough of him, but I don't think he's physical as McTom, so i think you're sacrificing a part of Scott's game that is very good for us.
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
Because we play with a front 4 with Bruno, not a front 3 like Liverpool.

I do think we should sell Pogba, but not because he isn't world class, just we can't fit him in our team with Bruno.

I've had this argument in the Rice thread, but Rice puts up pretty much the same numbers as Fred, so I don't see how it's a big upgrade - Bentancur I take your point, but don't know if he would translate into the prem. Camavinga? He's had a very average season and is just a kid. I couldn't comment on Neuhaus, not seen enough of him, but I don't think he's physical as McTom, so i think you're sacrificing a part of Scott's game that is very good for us.
Wijnaldum is the most advanced of the 3, so whether it's 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 you have to compare the 2 deeper midfielders, which is Henderson and Fabinho vs McFred.

Fair enough, I think we can if we use him off the left as we've been doing, but if the plan is to bring in Sancho then I'd sell him rather than the waste of time that is playing him in the double pivot.

Stats are decieving without context, I'm not even a huge Rice mark, but his defensive positioning is miles ahead of Fred, he snuffs things out in games before they even materialize, I'm a bit dubious of him on the ball but as DM he's comfortably better than both of McFred. With Neuhaus he'd replace Fred, Rice replaces McTominay's physicality.
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,083
Bruno hardly ever misses a game, the team needs to include a double pivot with Bruno and Pogba at AM/LW respectively to make sense for us.
Yes because we Ole overplays him. I mean we've won tons of games with Bruno at AM and without Pogba at LW.

I don't see Van de Beek working in that system like you do mate, Silva was a maestro, you can be defensively good by keeping the ball, moving your tewm around and running the opposition out chasing shadows, he basically operated the same way Iniesta did for Pep at Barca, Van de Beek isn't that player, h'es a quick give and go type, not a controller, he has very different attributes, the likes of Silva and Iniesta are the exception rather than the rule.
Yes he's not exactly like Silva but I think VdB has the skill that made that Guardiola system not get exposed defensively. On the ball he knows how to keep possession and maintain the flow of the game. Off the ball he presses and works hard. David Silva aside we've also seen Bernardo Silva play in that same system and role and City still played well. They don't get exposed defensively like they ought too because they dominated possession and worked hard off the ball. A Bruno - VdB - DM midfield is capable of this.
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
Yes because we Ole overplays him. I mean we've won tons of games with Bruno at AM and without Pogba at LW.
Bruno is hard to drop, similar to Rooney was for us, the big players don't sit out many games.


[Yes he's not exactly like Silva but I think VdB has the skill that made that Guardiola system not get exposed defensively. On the ball he knows how to keep possession and maintain the flow of the game. Off the ball he presses and works hard. David Silva aside we've also seen Bernardo Silva play in that same system and role and City still played well. They don't get exposed defensively like they ought too because they dominated possession and worked hard off the ball. A Bruno - VdB - DM midfield is capable of this.
I disagree but we'll just go round circles at this point, and more importantly I don't see Ole ever using that set-up either, in fact Van de Beek is probably on borrowed time.
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,083
Bruno is hard to drop, similar to Rooney was for us, the big players don't sit out many games.




I disagree but we'll just go round circles at this point, and more importantly I don't see Ole ever using that set-up either,
in fact Van de Beek is probably on borrowed time.
Same way I don't see Ole getting 2 midfielders. Or playing Pogba only on the left. But yeah let's agree to disagree cause we'd go in circles like you said
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
Same way I don't see Ole getting 2 midfielders. Or playing Pogba only on the left. But yeah let's agree to disagree cause we'd go in circles like you said
I agree with you on the first one, and that's why we'll be also rans again next season, as far as Pogba goes, if he doesn't want to use him on the left i hope we sell him or try for swap deal with Real Madrid.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,266
Another good goal.

His long-term position is on the left, no doubt about it.
 

Okey

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
2,434
What a goal. The season can't end soon enough. Cos the way he's going, a few millions more will be needed.
 

marktan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
6,933
Good goal. Problem is, Rashford or Pogba would score the exact same goal given that much time and space on the left.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,021
Location
Canada
Another good goal.

His long-term position is on the left, no doubt about it.
I dunno I really disagree. He's really creative on the right and has played more on the right in general. We'd use him mostly on the right too I'd expect, given Rashford on the left.
 

RRCE

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
926
He's an amazing talent at a great age. I absolutely appreciate the concern with prioritizing certain positions based on what is certain to be a limited budget, but this boy ticks all the boxes. In my opinion, you go get him at the price now being touted. He's a game changer that would give us incredible flexibility and options up front. Players like Sancho don't come along all that often (particularly ones that we have a very strong chance of signing). Despite our other needs, he's a no brainer of a signing.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,891
Location
England
Another nice goal cutting in from the left onto his favoured right foot.

 

marktan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
6,933
would you rather that go to the greedy glazers pockets?
That's not the correct argument, the argument is if that 100m isn't better spent elsewhere when we already have Rashford and Pogba in his position. Especially considering how thin our squad is compared to City and Chelsea.

We could get two very good £50m players with that money. I'm all for signing Sancho but at a realistic price that lets us build the rest of the squad too, as it needs to be for us to challenge. He's a very good player but he's not 100m good.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,469
would you rather that go to the greedy glazers pockets?
For 100m euros it is.
Why? We have only finished a bit behind City.

Our attack was really missing the first months of the season. Martial Greenwood weren't at the races and Cavani wasn't fit and was banned.

Imagine we had not wasted last summer. Sancho would probably had us that much closer.

Sounds worth it to me.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,469
That's not the correct argument, the argument is if that 100m isn't better spent elsewhere when we already have Rashford and Pogba in his position. Especially considering how thin our squad is compared to City and Chelsea.

We could get two very good £50m players with that money. I'm all for signing Sancho but at a realistic price that lets us build the rest of the squad too, as it needs to be for us to challenge. He's a very good player but he's not 100m good.
Statistically and age wise he is. And a large amount of those are at RW which is a weakness for us.
 

saivet

Full Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
25,304
The fact he can play both sides well is a good think. He's played well this season mainly on the left and in previous season he's played well, mostly on the right.
 

marktan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
6,933
Statistically and age wise he is. And a large amount of those are at RW which is a weakness for us.
I'll agree to disagree but in my opinion he's not. He gets stats in the Bundesliga but watching him play he's not a 100m player. I'd value him more like £60m. Good vision and assists but his dribbling isn't very pacey like Mane or Neymar, which could lead us to a similar Mikhitaryan like situation.

If Dortmund sell for say £65m it's a good deal as we can still get 2 more top players but at 100m euros we can only get one more. If Sancho doesn't end up being any better than Greenwood on the right then we've ended up wasting a whole summer on a squad option.
 

bosskeano

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2020
Messages
5,131
Sancho with 2 goals tonight in the first half agianst Leipzig in the German Cup Final.....the lad is worth the money required to get him from Dortmund
 

JustinC00

Full Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
2,695
assist from the right side now


meanwhile i'm watching rashford having another atrocious game
 

RazorOz

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
252
What a goal. The season can't end soon enough. Cos the way he's going, a few millions more will be needed.
Bigger problem is in classic Utd fashion it will likely drag out all summer, and we will risk losing out if he shines at the Euros.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
If it means I never have to watch Rashford play on the right again, he will be worth the money.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,121
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Wijnaldum is the most advanced of the 3, so whether it's 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 you have to compare the 2 deeper midfielders, which is Henderson and Fabinho vs McFred.

Fair enough, I think we can if we use him off the left as we've been doing, but if the plan is to bring in Sancho then I'd sell him rather than the waste of time that is playing him in the double pivot.

Stats are decieving without context, I'm not even a huge Rice mark, but his defensive positioning is miles ahead of Fred, he snuffs things out in games before they even materialize, I'm a bit dubious of him on the ball but as DM he's comfortably better than both of McFred. With Neuhaus he'd replace Fred, Rice replaces McTominay's physicality.
Take it all back after tonight.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.