- Joined
- Oct 15, 2020
- Messages
- 246
I still like Jose and I do believe he absolutely could have been a success here.
The board of any club ultimately need to decide, when hiring a manager, whether they are ready to fully back his project or whether they are hiring the best candidate to get the best out of the current crop. Most will decide on the latter because it's cheaper to replace the manager than to sack an entire subset of a squad.
But if Jose were to be have been fully backed (not £500m per transfer window, but at least buying him Maguire, Perisic, etc) then we could have challenged - for a season or possibly two.
The issue with Jose is that he tends to get through and dispense with a lot of players, so hiring him will probably lead to a couple of seasons of title challenges but with a bit of squad carnage and a lot of unhappy players left at the end of it. The CEO/DOF of a club must decide whether they're up for it or nor.
The board of any club ultimately need to decide, when hiring a manager, whether they are ready to fully back his project or whether they are hiring the best candidate to get the best out of the current crop. Most will decide on the latter because it's cheaper to replace the manager than to sack an entire subset of a squad.
But if Jose were to be have been fully backed (not £500m per transfer window, but at least buying him Maguire, Perisic, etc) then we could have challenged - for a season or possibly two.
The issue with Jose is that he tends to get through and dispense with a lot of players, so hiring him will probably lead to a couple of seasons of title challenges but with a bit of squad carnage and a lot of unhappy players left at the end of it. The CEO/DOF of a club must decide whether they're up for it or nor.