DOTA
wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2012
- Messages
- 24,504
It's nice not to have to give a shit about this. Very much not my party, not my problem.
Yeah, just avoid it.It’s an incredibly clumsily worded statement she made, but I understand what she’s getting at. But it’s never a good look to try and rank racism / prejudice if you’re a politician.
Yea and I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with the sentiment that racism of colour is a lot more pertinent and significant in history and modern times. George Floyd, BLM, Windrush are only from the last few years. Stephen Lawrence was in the news as of yesterday. Even in the gov statistics on hate crimes, racist hate crimes based on colour is the highest and increasing. And mentioning this shouldn’t downplay or erase the difficulties faced by other communities who are struggling with their own issues of external prejudice/racism etc. But me saying it on an internet forum is a lot more palatable than a politician.Yeah, just avoid it.
I imagine as a black woman she is looking at the racism faced by black people which is perhaps could be deemed as more "visual" and say, less subtle than antisemitism.
Agreed!Yea and I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with the sentiment that racism of colour is a lot more pertinent and significant in history and modern times. George Floyd, BLM, Windrush are only from the last few years. Stephen Lawrence was in the news as of yesterday. Even in the gov statistics on hate crimes, racist hate crimes based on colour is the highest and increasing. And mentioning this shouldn’t downplay or erase the difficulties faced by other communities who are struggling with their own issues of external prejudice/racism etc. But me saying it on an internet forum is a lot more palatable than a politician.
But what she's alluding to is just wrong.Yeah, just avoid it.
I imagine as a black woman she is looking at the racism faced by black people which is perhaps could be deemed as more "visual" and say, less subtle than antisemitism.
Black people weren't facing discrimination for centuries across Europe?!But what she's alluding to is just wrong.
Jews were facing discrimination for centuries in Europe - really like no other group. Prejudices against jews are still widespread.
Why strawman? This isn't the conservative party, noone is claiming racism against black people and other ethnic minorities isn't a serious thing in this discussion.Black people weren't facing discrimination for centuries across Europe?!
Yea, it's political point-scoring from Keir, 100%. I can't remember who said it in the other thread, but he really is a Tory in Labour clothing.She only has herself to blame for the stupidity of the comments but make no mistake, the right of the Labour party will use this to gleefully join the far right media in kicking the shit out of her because she's on the left, because she's unlikeable and because she's a black woman.
Keir and the Labour Party still don't take seriously the findings in the Forde Report, which included evidence of abuse and bullying of Dianne Abbott.
This letter was totally unnecessary. The outcome from this letter was totally predictable.Yea, it's political point-scoring from Keir, 100%. I can't remember who said it in the other thread, but he really is a Tory in Labour clothing.
I also think there's still some animosity coming her way due to her closeness to Corbyn.
Not like that. I am not a fan of Goat Rankings, but them Jews got the top spot in Europe easily.Black people weren't facing discrimination for centuries across Europe?!
I'm not, it's just the point is you can't say one group has faced discrimination as if another hasn't across Europe.Why strawman? This isn't the conservative party, noone is claiming racism against black people and other ethnic minorities isn't a serious thing in this discussion.
It's about a black woman downplaying the seriousness of antisemitism.
I've been saying for a while now that I wouldn't be surprised if years later we find out he was secretly installed by the Tories as a mole into the party to destroy it.Yea, it's political point-scoring from Keir, 100%. I can't remember who said it in the other thread, but he really is a Tory in Labour clothing.
I also think there's still some animosity coming her way due to her closeness to Corbyn.
This.We don't really take antisemitism seriously. We just found a way to wield its name in defence of right wing political projects. It's ignored where it's not so convenient.
I don't think she was downplaying it at all? Which quotes support that claim?Why strawman? This isn't the conservative party, noone is claiming racism against black people and other ethnic minorities isn't a serious thing in this discussion.
It's about a black woman downplaying the seriousness of antisemitism.
That's because racism against travellers and gypsy communities is a central policy offering.And ofcourse it's not surprising that in all of this no one is talking about her also ignoring racism faced by travelers/gypsies.
What could be less subtle than somebody attempting to exterminate your entire race?Yeah, just avoid it.
I imagine as a black woman she is looking at the racism faced by black people which is perhaps could be deemed as more "visual" and say, less subtle than antisemitism.
I am not a fan of Goat Rankings
Hmm.Jews got the top spot in Europe easily.
I don't want to spend too much time going down this rabbit hole...but the Nazis also persecuted/exterminated Romani, blacks, gypsies, disabled, gays, Slavic etc as well as their Jewish population. All of it heinous. All of it disgusting. All of it a stain on shared human history.What could be less subtle than somebody attempting to exterminate your entire race?
She is thinking of the racism felt by herself and dismissing the experiences of others. She likely also thinks her lack of popularity is down to her race rather than her just being an idiot, and quite a nasty one at that. Probably the single most damaging figure to the Labour Party in the last election and Starmer must be delighted he can get rid of her.
Possibly the bit that drew a comparison with redheads?I don't think she was downplaying it at all? Which quotes support that claim?
Nobody is denying the oppression & racism towards black people, Abbot was denying the oppression & racism towards Jews. Get rid of!!!I don't want to spend too much time going down this rabbit hole...but the Nazis also persecuted/exterminated Romani, blacks, gypsies, disabled, gays, Slavic etc as well as their Jewish population. All of it heinous. All of it disgusting. All of it a stain on shared human history.
But I don't see why that takes away from ~400-500 years of oppression and systemic racism that we still see today. Like I said in a previous post, BLM, George Floyd, anti-colonial/slave trade sentiment is only from the last couple of years. It's still a problem today. I agree that there's no benefit to try and get hierarchical about it, but she didn't say anything too outlandish either. It was clumsily worded, but nothing malicious in my opinion.
In a statement Keir Starmer said:Spiking is currently covered by several different offences but there is no single dedicated offence for police to use to catch dangerous perpetrators. The number of reported spiking incidents is on the rise, with a notable increase in the number of ‘needle spiking’, which is injecting someone with drugs without their consent.
Nearly 5,000 cases of needle and drink spiking incidents were reported to police in England and Wales in the 12 months to September 2022.
The home affairs select committee has recommended the creation of a separate criminal offence for spiking. However, that recommendation has been rejected by the government, arguing it was ‘unnecessary’. A spiking offence is supported by campaigners, police officers and the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners.
The next Labour government will also explore anonymous reporting systems for victims of spiking. Research suggests just 3% of spiking victims report to the police, making it a significantly under-reported crime.
Anonymous reporting would allow victims to report without shame or fear, but also allow police to identify spiking hotspots and flood resources to deal with perpetrators.
She wasn't though. And in any case, saying that 'x group had it worse' isn't antisemitic.Nobody is denying the oppression & racism towards black people, Abbot was denying the oppression & racism towards Jews. Get rid of!!!
I agree there is no sense getting hierarchical about it, but there are people alive today who survived the Holocaust (generations have passed since the last victims of the Atlantic slave trade). Anti-Semitism is alive and well in 2023 especially in the Middle East, and in the Labour Party apparently. You cant say that its a historic problem.I don't want to spend too much time going down this rabbit hole...but the Nazis also persecuted/exterminated Romani, blacks, gypsies, disabled, gays, Slavic etc as well as their Jewish population. All of it heinous. All of it disgusting. All of it a stain on shared human history.
But I don't see why that takes away from ~400-500 years of oppression and systemic racism that we still see today. Like I said in a previous post, BLM, George Floyd, anti-colonial/slave trade sentiment is only from the last couple of years. It's still a problem today. I agree that there's no benefit to try and get hierarchical about it, but she didn't say anything too outlandish either. It was clumsily worded, but nothing malicious in my opinion.
I kind of understand what she was saying on one level, but I have no intention of what she was trying to achieve with this statement though. She was dismissive of antisemitism, whether she meant to be or not, and to tacitly link it with being having red hair is beyond stupid. Jewish people have been persecuted, massacred and ousted from countries for centuries.I don't want to spend too much time going down this rabbit hole...but the Nazis also persecuted/exterminated Romani, blacks, gypsies, disabled, gays, Slavic etc as well as their Jewish population. All of it heinous. All of it disgusting. All of it a stain on shared human history.
But I don't see why that takes away from ~400-500 years of oppression and systemic racism that we still see today. Like I said in a previous post, BLM, George Floyd, anti-colonial/slave trade sentiment is only from the last couple of years. It's still a problem today. I agree that there's no benefit to try and get hierarchical about it, but she didn't say anything too outlandish either. It was clumsily worded, but nothing malicious in my opinion.
At first glance, this seems a good policy.Starmer says Labour would outlaw spiking drinks because law must 'keep up with evolving crime'
The Labour party has sent out a briefing note on its proposal to create a new offence to outlaw spiking drinks (see 10.29am), instead of relying on existing offences to deal with the problem.
It would also consider allowing people to report spiking incidents anonymously, it says. The party explains:
In a statement Keir Starmer said:
I saw first-hand as director of public prosecutions that victims are let down when the law doesn’t keep up with evolving crime. My government will recognise the reality of dangerous new crimes being perpetrated against, more often than not, young women, and we will act.
The rise of spiking sends terror through the heart of every parent with a daughter; and leaves young women feeling vulnerable. Women should not have to live in fear that when they go out, their drink may be spiked, or that they may be injected with a harmful substance. It is a pernicious, dangerous, and hateful crime, and Labour will punish it as such.
She said it was like redheadsI don't think she was downplaying it at all? Which quotes support that claim?
She's always been useless conveying her point, she's a terrible representative of the left. She didn't really say anything wrong but to say it at all is so incredibly tone deaf.
It's not necessarily the fact that generations have passed since the slave trade, more that that effects are still being felt, and that they're still so widespread. It's crazy what black people have to go through in the US, and Europe. I'd like to think we in the UK are better but there's still massive room for improvement. Systemic racism is a massive thing in day to day life. And mentioning this doesn't downplay antisemitism either. But also saying that racism of colour is worse than antisemitism isn't in itself antisemitic.I agree there is no sense getting hierarchical about it, but there are people alive today who survived the Holocaust (generations have passed since the last victims of the Atlantic slave trade). Anti-Semitism is alive and well in 2023 especially in the Middle East, and in the Labour Party apparently. You cant say that its a historic problem.
It's a malicious statement because she believes her experience matters more than other equally persecuted groups and is using her position to try and talk their experiences down.
If there is a masterplan, it would be to drop policy after policy that are so self-evident that they cannot be criticised, before launching a full manifesto probably next Spring.At first glance, this seems a good policy.
Not a bad analysis. Certainly possible as a contributing factor.I was thinking earlier that perhaps the UK as a nation takes antisemitism more seriously than black racism, because is it associated with and reflects something we are proud of as a nation defeating the Hitler and the Nazis (tied to our national identity & mythology).
Whereas black racism is more closely associated with things as a nation we are ashamed of/don't like to discuss, such as slavery and colonisation.
Probably wildly off the mark, due to a lack of caffeine.
For example, this guy didn't get instantly concerned and lose the whip from Starmer did he?We don't really take antisemitism seriously. We just found a way to wield its name in defence of right wing political projects. It's ignored where it's not so convenient.
There's definitely some European cultural guilt with the holocaust when it comes to antisemitism. I think there's an overreaction almost in such circumstances (how Keir is behaving right now is a prime example).I was thinking earlier that perhaps the UK as a nation takes antisemitism more seriously than black racism, because is it associated with and reflects something we are proud of as a nation defeating the Hitler and the Nazis (tied to our national identity & mythology).
Whereas black racism is more closely associated with things as a nation we are ashamed of/don't like to discuss, such as slavery and colonisation.
Probably wildly off the mark, due to a lack of caffeine.
Also to do with a certain amount of lobbying and money being provided by pro-Israel/Zionist groups that influence their reaction.That's because racism against travellers and gypsy communities is a central policy offering.