Although it sounds like a hellish plot for a Babe sequel, unbelievably, it's true.
Kurt Zouma / 180 hours community service + banned from keeping cats for 5 years
- Thread starter MyOnlySolskjaer
- Start date
What did Chris Wood do?
You that cats veterinarian are you?
Most hated club in the world where some teams are owned by Saudi regimes while teams some keep and protect players like Suarez(racism ) and Hazard(kicking the ball boy)? And then there is Italian teams that occasionally do racist chants and even throw a bananas at black players.
Its just common sense. The authoriities have investigated and taken the cats into custody where they were obviously examined.
If they were hurt, Zouma would have been in a lot more trouble.
The investigation isn’t complete so he may end up in more trouble.
I don't think that's necessarily true. The animal was taken off Zouma due to concerns about it's safety. Whether that abuse caused a serious injury or just bruising to the cat, it's still tantamount to the same offence of animal cruelty and the case remains ongoing. Not sure if people realise that cats, and many other animals, try and hide any pain they're in because they don't want to look vulnerable.
When you watch that video, you can see that Zouma exactly knew what he is doing. I am pretty sure that this wasn't a first time that cnut abused his cats.
The fact the cat wasnt injured by the kick is just good luck for Zouma. Whether or not the cats are injured isnt the issue, the actions are. Your argument taken to a different place would be that domestic violence doesnt count if the woman isnt actually injured
Imagine saying for domestic violence :"It was just one slap. He feels worse than her because of that. Leave the guy alone. He suffered enough."
that makes it even worse then. We support a club that gets some money from Saudi regime but want to take a moral high ground against a guy who kicked a cat?
Is kicking a ball boy any better than kicking a cat?
Supporters at away grounds all should start meowing during the match.
Not at all.
1. That's not the argument at all.
I responded to poster who said an eye for an eye.
The underlying philosophy of which is punishment by equivalent outcome.
By his own argument Zouma should not then be punished.
2. Even it were the argument
When applied to your fictional narrative, evidence of injury, including forensic evidence of previous injury goes a long way, not in establishing that a crime has occurred, but whether the act was particularly malicious, whether there is a pattern of abuse, and other such that will influence the severity of the punishment.
A first time abuser who hits his wife and a violent serial abuser are both guilty of the same offence but wont be getting the same sentence.
The argument is about how much Zouma should be punished, not whether he should be at all.
This would be interesting. Rather than boo him everyone should meow.
Perhaps we might start another Cantona incident if that happened.
This is good
https://news.sky.com/story/kurt-zou...-kicking-his-cat-sky-new-understands-12567728
Being prosecuted under the Animal Welfare Act according to Sky News. Still not had any form of suspension for West Ham, while his brother was suspended by Dagenham & Redbridge for four weeks.
Being prosecuted under the Animal Welfare Act according to Sky News. Still not had any form of suspension for West Ham, while his brother was suspended by Dagenham & Redbridge for four weeks.
Put him in jail
And throw the key away.
Put him in a cage with a massive cat and throw away the key.
We'll go old school.
Smeared from head to toe in all sorts of sticky jam and assorted food, and forced to run a 100metre gauntlet of some particularly hungry birds of prey
Some are even suggesting he should go to prison! I wouldn't support that even if it was a human let alone a cat. They can take away the pets tell him he can't have any and that's that.
Why is the brother being prosecuted?
He was the guy filming it, I believe.
It depends on the evidence. If someone filmed themselves kicking a child and then when the child was looked at by doctors they we’re able to deduce from injuries a history of physical abuse then I assume you’d be in favour of them getting sent to prison?
The evidence isn’t in the public domain so it’s impossible to know what kind of punishment they might face.
Because he has a much lower market value than his brother. Even tough Kurt's actions are worse both clubs evaluated the bad PR they will get vs the money they will lose and came to different conclusions what they should do about it. Simple
Laughable for anyone to suggest he should go to jail for this. I thought this shit was over by the way, i guess not.
What’s the crime there though? Am I missing something obvious?
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/45/section/4
Quite clear. He could have stopped it from happening but instead he watched and filmed.
Settle down Kurt. You'll have your day in court.
Thanks.
Has anyone two footed this prick yet?
Thanks Damo!
Is this an echo chamber where everyone is supposed to have the same opinion?
Put him in a cage with 24 normal sized, smelly, angry cats and throw away the key.