Kyle Rittenhouse | Now crowdfunding LOLsuits against Whoopi Goldberg, LeBron James, and The Young Turks
- Thread starter Drainy
- Start date
So, white guy shooting three other white guys is white privilege. However, the third white guy who drew a pistol but got shot in the in the arm instead is not white privilege because he was team blue.
Got it.
Or trying to defend the town from being looted / burned down. Clearly there's lots of nut jobs out there, Joseph Rosenbaum for one.
He had mental health issues, had just been released from hospital after attempting suicide.
Also a piece of shit by most accounts
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/10/03/kenosha-shooting-victims/
God the feckign drones are out tonight
He'd been abused as a child.
I suppose that makes molesting preteen kids okay
In a thread full of @Drainy ’s posts, congrats on the worst imaginable take.
I'm not going to argue, about nothing I know little about. 17 year old walking the streets with a weapon.. fanatic.
Can't even buy beer, but a weapon..yeah.. okay.
Next thing you'll tell me is that an ambulance cost more than a taxi to a hospital in the US.
You suppose some odd things.I suppose that makes molesting preteen kids okay
Was he molesting pre-teen kids the day he was killed?
For calling you a drone? It's not such a bad take tbf
When you quoted @Suedesi about the nutjob remark concerning Rosenbaum, why did you leave out his conviction for sex offenses?
I have no clue. But your response to my assertion that he was a piece of shit was "he was abused as a kid".
No I didn't see that story.
I didn't think it was a requirement for me to do so.
I was responding to the quote you posted.
I suppose that makes molesting preteen kids okay
Neither him being abused as a child or him being an adult abuser are ok, nor did either justify him getting killed by "Kyle". His demise was strictly because he ran after a guy with a loaded weapon.
Last edited:
Clearly
Not being content with Rittenhouse being found not guilty, some people now seem intent on making the shooting not just not illegal, but strictly morally good, or righteous. Not just the references to the child abuser, as if Rittenhouse could have had the slightest idea about that, but also framing it as if he was "just looking to protect business". Not his businesses, of course, or businesses whose owners had asked him to protect them, nor even businesses in his state.
Though, even during the trial itself some people were very quick to focus on the fact that he carried a first aid kit and said he was a medic, which he wasn't.
Though, even during the trial itself some people were very quick to focus on the fact that he carried a first aid kit and said he was a medic, which he wasn't.
Is Kyle Rittenhouse piloting them? I guess you could have said "NPCs" instead, but the mask would have come off a bit too much.
What’s an ‘NPC?’
God, this is enviable.
An adult man anally raped 9 year old children and that is your response?
This thread has really been an eye-opener about certain posters politics
In my mind @Drainy is Kyle Rittenhouse
Well, the people he killed weren't "victims" apparently
It always is with this lot
The black lives matter movement is about the disregard of the social contract when applied to people of colour. If they're breaking the social contract, why shouldn't the people on the other side of the argument.
fecking hell, do you want a white supremacy badge?!
How the feck did work that one out? I'm guessing you're white, so it's just normal for you, you don't see how you're privileged
The white privilege is that he got to trial, whereas a POC wouldn't have lasted the night.
WTF so funny? The quality of posting in the current has gone down the toilet.
Can't debate ideas anymore without these pomeranians barking all over the place.
If you have a point to make, please articulate it
Complains about the quality of posts.
Makes posts like this; “White privilege is just a construct that the media applies selectively to fit a narrative.”
Makes posts like this; “White privilege is just a construct that the media applies selectively to fit a narrative.”
You may not appreciate that many abusers were themselves abused, it doesn't make it alright in any way but it has an origin in a previous abuser. Children learn that it can be the only way to gain affection and carry that belief into adulthood. I just prefer not to try to de-humanise these people, not that it has any bearing on his death but his history was being brought up so I explained that there was more to the history.
Thank you, I so enjoy it when a poster is reduced to being abusive, particularly in this instance, you.
90% of abusers were abused. Simple fact is that when you mess up a kid when he's young, you feck him up for life
Different studies produce differing percentages.
A current one suggests that at least one in twenty men are abusers/pedophiles.
I'm a survivor, the amount of survivors I've met really opens your eyes
Okay, feel free to defend the paedophile rapist. You might say you're adding context but we know what you're really doing.
I mean... they were tears of happiness. Not tears of sadness. Of course he was going end up smiling after getting a few minutes to calm down.
I don't like the guy and I don't agree with the verdict. But this tweet just smacks of sensationalism for the sake of it.
I was a foster kid in a house where my best friend was being abused.
I'm pleased for you.