Ledley King...

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,201
Location
...
His injuries are well documented, but how good was he? I know he was a top player, but just how good?

He basically did no football training all week, just pool and spin so that he could play on a Saturday. His body couldn’t handle training, yet he was Spurs captain, went to two World Cups and not sold despite sporadic appearances.

There’s a school of thought that of all England’s top centre halves they produced during his generation, he was actually the best.
 

P-Nut

fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
21,674
Location
Oldham, Greater Manchester
His injuries are well documented, but how good was he? I know he was a top player, but just how good?

He basically did no football training all week, just pool and spin so that he could play on a Saturday. His body couldn’t handle training, yet he was Spurs captain, went to two World Cups and not sold despite sporadic appearances.

There’s a school of thought that of all England’s top centre halves they produced during his generation, he was actually the best.
He'd definitely be right up there if it wasn't for injuries. An absolute beast of a defender when fit.
 

Stadjer

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
7,579
Location
The Netherlands
He wasnt the best because Rio was better and so was John Terry.

Maybe he could have been the best out of all of them without all the injuries and fitness issues but that just wasnt the case. Ledley King was very good but Rio/Terry had such a high level that even without injuries would have been very hard to reach.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,201
Location
...
He was good. Wouldn't have started over Rio or Terry though, even without any injury problems.
Currently reading Peter Crouch’s biography and he was really gushing over him in that. Of course, they were teammates, although Crouch was also international teammates with Rio, Terry, Campbell and co, but Crouch reckons he was as good as Rio.

He mentioned them going to play for England for an U18 tournament in Spain and both Real and Barca made offers to sign King on the spot, but he turned them down.
 

COYS23

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
4
Supports
spurs
For me Ledley would have been better than Rio and Terry if not for his injuries, his footballing brain was that's for sure as he always seemed to be in the right place at the right time which I suppose is why he was still able to carry on even with his knee problems.
As a Spurs fan I maybe biased but the greatest tackle I have ever seen came from Ledley against Robben, I would post the video but as a newbie I don't think I can, how he caught him with his knees was a miracle in itself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: golden_blunder

P-Nut

fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
21,674
Location
Oldham, Greater Manchester
He wasnt the best because Rio was better and so was John Terry.

Maybe he could have been the best out of all of them without all the injuries and fitness issues but that just wasnt the case. Ledley King was very good but Rio/Terry had such a high level that even without injuries would have been very hard to reach.
I think he was capable of being a mixture of the 2 injuries permitting. He was neither as warrior like as Terry or as good positioning wise or playing out from the back as Ferdinand. But he was likely stronger in the weak areas of each of their games.
 

Bojan11

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
33,115
Considering his limited time training and his performances he was pretty good.

But I always felt with him especially pre 2004 he always had a mistake in him. But he seemed to look more solid not surprisingly after his England call up. He seemed to raise his game after that especially when Sven chose him over Carragher.

It’s tough judging him against Rio and Terry. Even though I think the latter two were better. But they did have the advantages of not having the injuries King had and more importantly world class partners at club level.
 

Scroto Baggins

Full Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2017
Messages
2,347
Supports
Newcastle Jets
He'd definitely be right up there if it wasn't for injuries. An absolute beast of a defender when fit.
He had it all, pace and power combined with a footballing brain. Just missing knees, they are kind of important though.

I think it was Henry who was quoted as saying you would look down and the ball was gone when playing against King.

Queue that Robben tackle lol.
 

Bobski

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
10,023
At the point he had matured beyond the naive mistakes his knees were gone so we only really had glimpses of how good he really was.

A 3 of Terry, Rio and fit King, that's not fair. Still had Campbell around who was still a damm good player up to 2006 or so. England really did have exceptional talent in that era, what a waste, especially when you watch this current team with much less talent play with so little nervous tension in comparison.

Woodgate was a real talent ruined by injuries as well in that period, could add Wes Brown with his knees wrecked early on.
 

Thunderhead

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2016
Messages
3,156
Supports
City
Similar with injuries but I think Woodgate was better than him and would have been top class if not for being made of biscuit
 

Bubz27

No I won’t change your tag line
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
21,594
Henry said he was best defender he played against.

Personally I thought Rio was better because he had more of the intangibles and basically didn't have a weak area to his game.

If Ledley had stayed fit, I'd have had him above John Terry, but that's a preference on style of CB.

In short, he was fantastic.
 

RochaRoja

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
1,567
One of those players whose reputation became massively inflated because he was injured so much. He was in his mid twenties before the knee issues started before his knee issues became chronic and was way behind Ferdinand, Terry, Campbell and even Carragher for England selection then.

He was a really good Premier League centre back and would’ve probably been even better if not for injuries but not the world class talent Spurs fans make him out to be.

If anything, I’d say a large reason why he was so beloved and hyped at Tottenham is because they so badly wanted him to be better than Campbell (for obvious reasons).
 

Sean_RedDevil

Twitter bot
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
21,364
Location
NYC (Before Manchester+Hamburg)
At the point he had matured beyond the naive mistakes his knees were gone so we only really had glimpses of how good he really was.

A 3 of Terry, Rio and fit King, that's not fair. Still had Campbell around who was still a damm good player up to 2006 or so. England really did have exceptional talent in that era, what a waste, especially when you watch this current team with much less talent play with so little nervous tension in comparison.

Woodgate was a real talent ruined by injuries as well in that period, could add Wes Brown with his knees wrecked early on.
+ Carragher
 

Primativ

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Messages
371
Supports
Tottenham
One of those players whose reputation became massively inflated because he was injured so much. He was in his mid twenties before the knee issues started before his knee issues became chronic and was way behind Ferdinand, Terry, Campbell and even Carragher for England selection then.

He was a really good Premier League centre back and would’ve probably been even better if not for injuries but not the world class talent Spurs fans make him out to be.

If anything, I’d say a large reason why he was so beloved and hyped at Tottenham is because they so badly wanted him to be better than Campbell (for obvious reasons).
Absolute nonsense. King was easily world class and just as good as Terry and Ferdinand. Those two played in far better teams than King did and thus won far more but if King didn’t have dodgy knees he would have left Spurs at his peak and won many trophies. The guy didn’t even train but came in and gave MoM performances week in week out. He was so good on the ball he sometimes played in midfield, was strong and quick and read the game brilliantly. Didn’t have any weaknesses apart from a weakness in his knees. Crying shame really. Easily a hall of famer CB in the league and Carragher wasn’t fit to lace Kings boots.
 

Thiagoal

New Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
2,565
I was convinced Tyler Blacket would turn out to be the next Ledley King after watching him in the FA Youth Cup WTFDIK
 

Alabaster Codify7

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
6,553
Location
Wales
Ledley King was an absolutely fantastic footballer, one of the best CB's I've ever seen that didn't reach world class levels due to his fitness problems.

A real monster. As a former GK, I'd have LOVED playing behind that bloke.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,100
Better than Carragher.

Comfortably behind Ferdinand, Terry and Campbell though.
 

SquishyMcSquish

New Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Messages
8,198
Supports
Tottenham
100% would have been the best English CB if injuries hadn't been a factor.

Yep, better than Rio and Terry. The man was a monster, even though he was mostly broken which is a colossal shame.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,774
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days

edit:

:D It's a must for any King thread.
A bit off topic but that’s the perfect example of the absolute nonsense that commentators come out with.

“King was ten yards adrift of one of the quickest players in the league in Robben...”.

It doesn’t matter if that was Arjen Robben or a 37 year old Laurent Blanc, the ball was looping in the air and Robben had to wait for it to come down. He had no real opportunity to exploit his pace.

Doesn’t take anything away from King’s defending though.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
Better than Carragher.

Comfortably behind Ferdinand, Terry and Campbell though.
I'm glad someone mentioned Campbell because yes King wasn't even as good as him let alone Rio Ferdinand
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,085
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
Yo have to put it on even playing ground though. Rio, Terry and Campbell were all better than king, certainly.

But if they all played with 0 training week to week, would they be as good? Or even as good as king?

And what level would king have been had he been able to train like a normal player? To play like a normal player?

Think if you have them all similar playing time and training time, if have Rio, then king, then Terry and Campbell.
 

Nadger

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 2, 2014
Messages
156
Supports
Spurs
As I understand it, Ledley’s original knee injury was sustained on his premier league debut. So it is impossible to say how good he would have been.

But, given that, it’s incredible that he performed as well as he did for as long as he did, and I’m proud that my club stood behind him all that time and kept him in the game as long as they did.

Absolutely a club legend.

The supporters trust asked if the 26 shirt should be retired, but the club said that they would keep it open in case his son was signed professionally.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,987
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
100% would have been the best English CB if injuries hadn't been a factor.

Yep, better than Rio and Terry. The man was a monster, even though he was mostly broken which is a colossal shame.
Considering Rio was the best centreback in the world for a couple of years at his peak, it's difficult to say King could have been better.
 

Nadger

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 2, 2014
Messages
156
Supports
Spurs
Considering Rio was the best centreback in the world for a couple of years at his peak, it's difficult to say King could have been better.
It's not difficult at all to say it, it's just difficult to justify it. Because it's based on what-ifs and what-might-have-beens. But thats the point of this thread isn't it?
 

Robert

Full Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
408
One of those players who’s rating and value seemed to rise more in his absence. But then I wouldn’t really deem him overrated either.

Felt he had great reading of the game, decent ball skills and good athletic ability. I personally really liked him, top player on his day.