I was just thinking about the caf's transformation of sentiment towards lingard over the years. It's funny because he was meant to be the late bloomer (prophesied by Sir Alex himself) who, at 23-24 was ready to crack into our first team. Having proved the doubters wrong (most of us considered Januzaj to be a far superior talent at the time), Lingard was able to score crucial goals for us in big matches and there seemed potential for a lot more to come.
But age has started catching up with him and now touching 27, his shenanigans no longer just seem like banter or something that you could attribute to a youthful zeal. His form (or lack of) and the club's current state are obviously a large reason for the negativity, but Lingard is doing himself no favors. Even if we consider this particular post to be a gaffe by his PR team, his general behavior makes it difficult to give him any benefit of the doubt. I read a few posts on here calling him "manchild" and though a bit harsh, it's relevant! With actual youngsters like Greenwood, Gomes, Chong making inroads into the first team, you are not really excited by the idea of JLingz being their leader and role model, which is what he should be aspiring for.
Having said all that, I am not sure whether his brand marketing efforts and general behavior appeal to a younger target audience which is not part of the caf, so we tend to hear and have a biased perspective. It is difficult to fathom though, promoting your brand, when your performances on the pitch have been shit, surely that's counterproductive?
Here's hoping for a much better 2019/20 season from him. #LinGod (I still want our youth products to do well!)
P.S.
It's been ages since I posted here, but have been an ardent reader for many years (ya, there are many of us out there!)