FrankDrebin
Don't call me Shirley
Just utter incompetence shown by Barca in recent years. Huge fee's plus fat wages on big names they didnt necessarily need, all the while their best ever player continually taking them to the cleaners.
I seem to remember reading they had to change the flight paths of planes in Barcelona as Messi didnt want them flying over his house. Whether this is an urban myth or not I’m not sure?Messi is bigger than Barca.
Bait
Let's be honest: Barca played their hand awfully years ago and could have leveraged Messi's name, their success and standing as well as the beauty of the city against talent coming in, but instead went the whole shebang and blew through millions upon millions of euros in the process.[insert player] is joining Barcelona because of the history, the beautiful city and a chance to play with the great Lionel Messi. Turns out they are just handing out Chinese league type contracts.
He's still arguarbly the best player in the world atm, but he's 34 now. I think it's fairly mental to blow a massive amount of their finances on Messi when he's only going to decline.If ypu want to have the best player of all time in your Team It will cost you a fortune but he will give you a lot in terms of money and in the pitch. He provided.
It was a tongue in cheek comment made by Vueling president when he said planes can't fly over Messi' house. He's right but not because it's Messi but because of environmental issues. Barcelona Airport is very close to a protected area. Planes leaving or entering have to detour out to sea before they can carry on their journey. Beautiful beaches there with a lot less people.I seem to remember reading they had to change the flight paths of planes in Barcelona as Messi didnt want them flying over his house. Whether this is an urban myth or not I’m not sure?
I have to agree. Griezmann, Dembele, Coutinho have been far worse deals than handing out the massive contract to Messi. He lived up to it, the others didn’t.Griezmann deal is probably the dumbest sports decision in the past 10 years.
Griezmann and his "the decision" video/PR stunt was a farcical stunt as well. Guy is full of himself, and seemed to be fairly close to Pogba, so I'm not surprised.I have to agree. Griezmann, Dembele, Coutinho have been far worse deals than handing out the massive contract to Messi. He lived up to it, the others didn’t.
It is not about the shirt sales myth. It is about leaked documents that show that there are commercial contracts that state that Barca will receive x% less should Messi not be at the club.It's an absurd myth that players like Messi generate hundreds of millions of additional revenue. Real Madrid didn't drop any revenues after Ronaldo left. Their operating income in 16/17 was 675 million Euros. In 19/20 it was 715 million Euros. Did not drop a dime.
In the grand scheme of business someone like Messi is a nobody for big corporations. There are 1000 times bigger celebrities globally and outside of football that these corporations can chose to work with so there is no reason to pay a ransom for Messi's name.
Also most sponsorship deals that include Messi's name will inevitably flow into Messi's pockets and not Barca's anyway. He has kept all his naming rights from what I know. That's what Ronaldo was complaining about at Madrid because Madrid didn't allow that.
Barca sell only slightly more shirts than Liverpool or Juventus despite them not having Messi. It's not like Barca are selling additional millions of Messi shirts.
I'd be surprised if Messi realistically gained Barca even 10 million a year.
On the pitch he doesn't lead to anything either. 3rd place in the league and CL round of 16 exit with yet another humiliation. Not his fault obviously but it's like putting a band aid made of gold and diamonds on a chopped off arm which leaves no money for the necessary surgery.
Thank you. Tired of debating people on this issue. Messi's value to Barcelona is what he does on the pitch. Outside that, his value is marginal. Attributing the growth of Barca's revenue to Messi is plainly stupid. Correlation is not causation. Our (Man Utd) revenues are more than twice what they were when Messi made his debut...Just like almost every big club. Do we have Messi in our ranks? If Messi left this summer, Barca's revenues will be largely unchanged. Laporta can say what he wants. He has an agenda. He doesn't want to be the president that lost Messi and will spout any narrative that justifies giving into Messi's demands.It's an absurd myth that players like Messi generate hundreds of millions of additional revenue. Real Madrid didn't drop any revenues after Ronaldo left. Their operating income in 16/17 was 675 million Euros. In 19/20 it was 715 million Euros. Did not drop a dime.
In the grand scheme of business someone like Messi is a nobody for big corporations. There are 1000 times bigger celebrities globally and outside of football that these corporations can chose to work with so there is no reason to pay a ransom for Messi's name.
Also most sponsorship deals that include Messi's name will inevitably flow into Messi's pockets and not Barca's anyway. He has kept all his naming rights from what I know. That's what Ronaldo was complaining about at Madrid because Madrid didn't allow that.
Barca sell only slightly more shirts than Liverpool or Juventus despite them not having Messi. It's not like Barca are selling additional millions of Messi shirts.
I'd be surprised if Messi realistically gained Barca even 10 million a year.
On the pitch he doesn't lead to anything either. 3rd place in the league and CL round of 16 exit with yet another humiliation. Not his fault obviously but it's like putting a band aid made of gold and diamonds on a chopped off arm which leaves no money for the necessary surgery.
hazard was worseGriezmann deal is probably the dumbest sports decision in the past 10 years.
Ditto for Balehazard was worse
I think this is true for the Spanish clubs that have wages to turnover margins of 70%. The English clubs are in very good shape.It's not hard to see why clubs were pushing for the ESL - the wages at the top level are simply unsustainable.
But Hazard could have been a success if not for the injuries. Barca spent €100+m on one of the very few players who are incompatible with Messi. And not only that, they were already in a strained financial situation before that. Griezmann really was the climax to a bunch of Barca transfers that left you sxratching your head, IMOhazard was worse
I’d still take what Griezmann, coutinho and dembele have given than what hazard has given. I agree all of those transfers were poor but hazard was easily the worst combo of money spent and actual productionBut Hazard could have been a success if not for the injuries. Barca spent €100+m on one of the very few players who are incompatible with Messi. And not only that, they were already in a strained financial situation before that. Griezmann really was the climax to a bunch of Barca transfers that left you sxratching your head, IMO
But, Hazard was definitely the best player of these four.I’d still take what Griezmann, coutinho and dembele have given than what hazard has given. I agree all of those transfers were poor but hazard was easily the worst combo of money spent and actual production
In hindsight, yes. But the failure of Griezmann and to an extent Dembele was foreseeable, Hazard's fall from grace less so.I’d still take what Griezmann, coutinho and dembele have given than what hazard has given. I agree all of those transfers were poor but hazard was easily the worst combo of money spent and actual production
But remember.... the ESL was for the good of football as a whole.They're on huge wages, €324m to get off the bill, somehow!
If Messi leaves and their revenue really drops by one third or whatever it is they expect, they are fecked. And apparently, this isn't some abstract calculation but based on very real and hands on contract clauses with their sponsors. If their numbers are correct, it is Messi who finances the high salaries of the other players, not vice versa.A club too scared to go on without their aging star, and a player too scared to go elsewhere to get the money he wants. A match made in heaven.
If you love the club, care about your teammates and understand the new rules of the competition you play in, sign the sizeable contract that is on the table. Be realistic after earning so well for so long.
Barcelona should be putting their foot down on a 34 year old player and giving him their best offer, take it or leave it.
He doesn’t want to go anywhere else and is taking the piss. Squad harmony out the window for all those who have been asked to take a paycut for him to stay.
Barcelona, you can’t afford it. La Liga doesn’t let you do it anymore. Say thanks for the 17 years of success and trophies and say goodbye. You are embarrassing yourselves.
He might apply for benefitsSo what happens if Barcelona cant meet messi financial demands according to la liga rules and messi doesnt want to go to PSG (who have made him a offer).
Can he still play for Barcelona next season while out of contract?
They will eventually need to survive without him anyway. They can renegotiate deals or use that mountain of cash to buy new stars! They are Barcelona, they certainly won’t want for sponsors or investors.If Messi leaves and their revenue really drops by one third or whatever it is they expect, they are fecked. And apparently, this isn't some abstract calculation but based on very real and hands on contract clauses with their sponsors. If their numbers are correct, it is Messi who finances the high salaries of the other players, not vice versa.
But I'm sure they will find a solution. It's in the league's interest he stays, too.
sure, but once that contract was signed he was an absolute disaster. If we had Liverpool’s coutinho or Madrid got Chelsea’s hazard both clubs would be happy. Far from the realityBut, Hazard was definitely the best player of these four.
how so? Barca offered him the deal, not the other way around. Ronaldo is a hundred times more narcissistic than Messi. Ronaldo left madrid because he felt he wasn’t paid enoughRemember when Messi was thought to be such a nice down to earth lad with Barcelona in his heart. and Ronaldo was thought to be the psychotic narcissistic? Hilarious now.
To be fair, Ronaldo has a case. No way should Ronaldo earning less than half of what Messi does. He still earns less than half but credit to Madrid for drawing a line. Something mes que in club seem incapable of doing.how so? Barca offered him the deal, not the other way around. Ronaldo is a hundred times more narcissistic than Messi. Ronaldo left madrid because he felt he wasn’t paid enough
My mother would have given me the last pound in her purse, the difference is that I would never have asked for it, less taken it.how so? Barca offered him the deal, not the other way around. Ronaldo is a hundred times more narcissistic than Messi. Ronaldo left madrid because he felt he wasn’t paid enough
So you're admitting he's no better. The only difference is Barca are a spineless bunch of pussies who bend over for Messi whereas for all his faults Perez, isn't a pussyhow so? Barca offered him the deal, not the other way around. Ronaldo is a hundred times more narcissistic than Messi. Ronaldo left madrid because he felt he wasn’t paid enough