worldinmotion66
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2015
- Messages
- 2,028
Why can’t we take Cucurella for the season and let Malacia go on loan in January?
Nevermind Patrice, give me Phil sodding Neville.What's Patrice up to these days?
Get Buttner in.Nevermind Patrice, give me Phil sodding Neville.
Great video and reasonable take - only quibble is I don't think he's a UCL calibre player currently. As you point out correctly, his attributes seem to be best suited for a midtable side whilst the comical errors he makes routinely limit his appeal for the bigger teams - in my opinion he's done little to justify being rated as a player who should be playing in the CL on merit.
Bring in VeseliGet Buttner in.
We did accept the Maguire bid to be fair.Yeah, we really have about £3m to spend and are trying to recruit a LB and CM - complete and utter joke of a club.
McTominay and Maguire still here when we could have got £60m for them.
I actually hope we are forced to give Alvaro Fernandez his chance.
But he's still here and we could have reinvested the money.We did accept the Maguire bid to be fair.
Right but he's here largely because of him.But he's still here and we could have reinvested the money.
He’s here because he didn’t want to go to West Ham.But he's still here and we could have reinvested the money.
Maguire replacement would have been Todibo/Pavard.Right but he's here largely because of him.
We could have paid him off for the full amount sure (as much as £10-12m apparently?) but then that doesn't exactly set a great precedent for when other players are wanting pay-offs.
To be fair, he's here because Ole is an idiot. One of the craziest transfer sagas of the past decade. Waited until the end and Leicester new we would pay what we did. Giving him huge wages to boot and here we are.He’s here because he didn’t want to go to West Ham.
I fecking wish it was the muppet from Chelsea now.
Just when you think these last 3 weeks couldn't possibly get any more farcicalNah, its more because he played in the Carabao Cup yesterday and he will be cup tied and won't be able to play when we want to use him instead in that cup.
110% it was deliberate on Chelsea’s behalf. Watch him not play a single minute from here on out.I assume it was absolutely deliberate on Chelsea's part. Chelsea think he's crap and don't want him back in January. Now that he's played for them, it rules out the possibility of a six-month loan deal (you can't play for three clubs in the same season), so we are forced to take him for the full season or turn to someone much, much worse (Reguilon).
Reguilon video needed, stat!
There will be some good ones circa 2019/20. He actually was a promising player who many on here wanted to sign at one stage. He's been terrible for three years, though and just doesn't seem cut out for Premier League football. I'd much rather have Telles back.Reguilon video needed, stat!
If United were floating the idea of sending him back in January when, I guess Shaw is fit again, then feck that. I’m glad this isn’t happening. That is the most pointless of pointless deals we could make.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Here, here. Absolutely.This season is going to be grim. We need better owners and better people in charge
It can also just be part of a cognitive test.Here, here. Absolutely.
You can always judge a transfer window, by the amount of somersaults your head is doing.
Maybe the deal was already collapsed by that point.Him playing last night still makes no sense.
Small time move from a shitty club, not surprised.Him playing last night still makes no sense.
Yeah maybe so. Maybe him going wasnt a big deal either way to Chelsea but its pretty daft regardless.Maybe the deal was already collapsed by that point.
Him playing last night still makes no sense.
Not to be an irritating ITK feckwit, but after the initial disagreement on the loan fee (i.e. United offering 2m and Chelsea asking for 7m), United counteroffered with 2m for a 6 month loan, which is actually a smaller financial commitment given Cucurella's salary and that pissed off Chelsea's hierarchy. Playing him yesterday was a way to make the 6 month loan a non-starter.Maybe the deal was already collapsed by that point.
Win-win situation really, we don’t have to see Cucurell in our team and you get to marvel at his hair for another season. Everybody happy!Not to be an irritating ITK feckwit, but after the initial disagreement on the loan fee (i.e. United offering 2m and Chelsea asking for 7m), United counteroffered with 2m for a 6 month loan, which is actually a smaller financial commitment given Cucurella's salary and that pissed off Chelsea's hierarchy. Playing him yesterday was a way to make the 6 month loan a non-starter.
Chelsea's position has always been that this is a situation where both clubs could mutually benefit, but they haven't pushed Cucurella towards the door once it became clear we were losing Hall. United coming back with a significantly worse second offer than what they opened with seems to have backfired, especially if the fallback option is Reguilon.
Fair enough.Not to be an irritating ITK feckwit, but after the initial disagreement on the loan fee (i.e. United offering 2m and Chelsea asking for 7m), United counteroffered with 2m for a 6 month loan, which is actually a smaller financial commitment given Cucurella's salary and that pissed off Chelsea's hierarchy. Playing him yesterday was a way to make the 6 month loan a non-starter.
Chelsea's position has always been that this is a situation where both clubs could mutually benefit, but they haven't pushed Cucurella towards the door once it became clear we were losing Hall. United coming back with a significantly worse second offer than what they opened with seems to have backfired, especially if the fallback option is Reguilon.
Good, and I hope we never are put in a position where we have to go to Chelsea asking for a loan deal like this again.Not to be an irritating ITK feckwit, but after the initial disagreement on the loan fee (i.e. United offering 2m and Chelsea asking for 7m), United counteroffered with 2m for a 6 month loan, which is actually a smaller financial commitment given Cucurella's salary and that pissed off Chelsea's hierarchy. Playing him yesterday was a way to make the 6 month loan a non-starter.
Chelsea's position has always been that this is a situation where both clubs could mutually benefit, but they haven't pushed Cucurella towards the door once it became clear we were losing Hall. United coming back with a significantly worse second offer than what they opened with seems to have backfired, especially if the fallback option is Reguilon.
Happy days.Not to be an irritating ITK feckwit, but after the initial disagreement on the loan fee (i.e. United offering 2m and Chelsea asking for 7m), United counteroffered with 2m for a 6 month loan, which is actually a smaller financial commitment given Cucurella's salary and that pissed off Chelsea's hierarchy. Playing him yesterday was a way to make the 6 month loan a non-starter.
Chelsea's position has always been that this is a situation where both clubs could mutually benefit, but they haven't pushed Cucurella towards the door once it became clear we were losing Hall. United coming back with a significantly worse second offer than what they opened with seems to have backfired, especially if the fallback option is Reguilon.
Yeah fair enough - but is it really any better to do so with Spurs for a player who is almost certainly considerably worse?Good, and I hope we never are put in a position where we have to go to Chelsea asking for a loan deal like this again.
Oh I'm not trying to pretend like this is a good outcome for Chelsea - I think Cucurella is awful. Just trying to provide some context for why he played yesterday.Happy days.
Now you’re stuck with a £60m fraud and we can end Reg’s cheap loan in January.