croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 34,789
Trying to do a Malacia style hijack supposedly just without the agreed fee partThought he was off to Roma in January
Trying to do a Malacia style hijack supposedly just without the agreed fee partThought he was off to Roma in January
That's a reason you ideally shouldn't, not a reason you can't. Or even just practically shouldn't.
By which I mean if you need a striker, and you have a limited budget, and the striker market is scarce, and there was a young striker you had an eye on reintroducing to the squad this season but now realise you can't, signing another striker of that same age might be the best option you have and make complete sense. It's not like there are a plethora of more experienced options available at that price you'd be turning down in his favour, you're making do with what's available.
There's zero reason to think this will happen but of all the reasons it won't, the notion that signing two young CFs would be a problem in itself is very far down on the list.
City signed Haaland and Alvarez in the same transfer window, for example. PSG seem to be trying to sign Ramos and Muani. I wish we could sign Hojlund and someone like this kid, because it certainly wouldn't be overkill.
Haaland was a proven striker, with the only question mark being adaptation to the league.Madrid once had Benzema and Higuain. City currently Haaland and Alvarez. We need goal scorers.
But he is not a top striker. The point is these 2 would be equally unproven at a high level.Why not? Have we learned anything from what happened with Greenwood?
I still remember back then some were against buying a top striker because we already had Greenwood. One big injury, or Hojlund flops badly, or he does another Greenwood and we're back to square one - play Rashford there. You'll never know what might happen in a couple years so if you can sign a top prospect, grab him with all your mind. Plus 17m is nothing these days even things don't work out big deal. And if so we will be able to sell the kid for at least half of that imo.
What choice do we have? There are no decent established strikers available for a fee we can afford. We signed a dozen older strikers on short term deals over the last few years and not one of them has worked out. Youngsters are our only option.Well there's an obvious reason. Can't have both of your strikers adapting and getting used to the league and we are waiting on their development.
Yeah agreed. That's why I later clarified I'm just happy to have another striker, if he is indeed a proper 9What choice do we have? There are no decent established strikers available for a fee we can afford. We signed a dozen older strikers on short term deals over the last few years and not one of them has worked out. Youngsters are our only option.
I could see us getting Toney in January but what will he cost.
Are people complaining? I'd be happy to sign Leonardo, I just think it's unlikely we'll make the signing knowing how we generally operate. All messages I've seen here seem to similarly not be against the signing but think it probably just won't happenPeople complain that we let City get Alvarez on the cheap and then will complain if we did this deal.
Vitor Roque's already been signed by Barcelona. Yes though he will definitely be a starVitor Roque is way much better, but also much more expensive.
Did Barca not sign him?Vitor Roque is way much better, but also much more expensive.
Toney would need to be playing the majority of the minutes going to justify signing him. I think we could split minutes and bring one of them on at 60 mins when we’ve two young strikers.Not against him (IF we are interested) but just feel an experienced striker like Toney could be useful in January was my point on it
never doesThe sort of link I love to see! However it's also the sort of link that will never materialise.
There's still hope. We have a new structure and ETH. Things might change. I really wish us to start signing these low risk cheap potentials. Most top clubs do the same. They sign big names for the starting XI and these kids for backups and the future.The sort of link I love to see! However it's also the sort of link that will never materialise.
Did Barca not sign him?
They are yet to pay the first amortization of the transfer and are waiting for the Champions League money to pay it. This transfer might not be as closed as people think. But knowing iberian culture pretty sure some bankster who is a Barça fanatic will make sure they will have a credit line with small interest to save their day.Vitor Roque's already been signed by Barcelona. Yes though he will definitely be a star
Guy falls over on 0 contact
Antony?Attacking Brazilian player what could go wrong? Sign him
We're good, he's never worked with Erik before nor been almost signed by Ajax or played in the Eredivisie.Antony?
Yes that's what I was getting at .Antony?
United were quoted from many sources to be interested in him in May however with the planned return of Greenwood, that priority maybe changed.Looks very promising for the bargain basement we're shopping in. Any legs to this story?
Two rolls of the dice...We just bought hojlund, how is us having two unproven prospects boost our chances?
That’s still better than only having 1 signing and hoping he comes good. We’re fecked if Holjund gets injuredWell there's an obvious reason. Can't have both of your strikers adapting and getting used to the league and we are waiting on their development.
Exactly, I'd rather have two young strikers vying for the position and providing some depth than just one, or having to play players out of position continuously.That’s still better than only having 1 signing and hoping he comes good. We’re fecked if Holjund gets injured
Why not? What’s wrong with having two young strikers?Can we afford to have two young prospects?