The thing is that players who can reliable beat a man are like gold dust, because in a system era they destabilise opposing systems. In our current team we have only one player who can do that, Amad. We have a few other very decent technical footballers, but none who can reliably dribble past anyone and create overloads and space in the way Amad can. Garnacho can theoretically do this but he has developed the game intelligence yet to apply it, he too often goes down blind alleys and is quite easily controlled. With Amad oppos can double up, and still keep the system intact. Cunha gives us that same ability on the other side, which suddenly makes defending against us much much harder. You can’t double up on both sides without seriously compromising your system.
What’s good about both players is that once they have created space by going past a player or two, they are not afraid to release the ball to better positioned team mates. I would expect these two to create lots of chances for each other, for the striker, and for a deep running midfielder like Bruno. Another key will be having a striker on the end of these chances who isn’t afraid to put them away.
I’m all for this signing. He’s a very exciting player. He’s also not afraid to hit one from distance, to great effect, which is hugely important against packed low blocks.
Very good points. I think players like Amad (and possibly Eze) have a bigger control over their game, but I think Cunha adds more directness and a type of fight the other two possibly wouldn't - to my knowledge at least.
But in general, the reliance on a few players, in this case Amad up front did show too much.
And his personal directness and (arguable) attribution to goal scoring (and even more so assisting perhaps) will help both Hojlund and/or Zirkzee as well. They haven't shown it, but they both have attributes that could add to the destabilization of opposing systems as well. Hojlund in an almost headless power chicken which adds chaos to defenders if someone just runs and has some strength to him, while Zirkzee is a bit more obviously an unorthodox striker option. If Cunha slots in well, Amad gets more consistent, both Hojlund and Zirkzee would need less of a return to form than they showed this season, as a solid support to your striker will make many strikers perform better, while Zirkzee has a bit more room to be his own type of player again if you add a threat like Cunha to your setup - again, if he slots in well.
But I've seen promise (and unconfirmed) transfers before, so being here as one of the ETH and Zirkzee supporters, I also know to keep my expectations lower now.
But just wanted to add that even without a new striker I think someone like Cunha (and hopefully just one more option to rotate/replace with) next to Amad behind Hojlund or Zirkzee will make plenty people forget how done they were with those two, too.
But you do need it. That's how even over the top stars have often won games for teams, as they just seem to work and act a bit different from the rest. They won't magically give you a working system, but, like you said, they do offer you an edge.
I didn't like Suarez at Atleti, nor did I Villa before him. But oh my, they did show what Simeone meant with that magical touch. They were bad (and lazy) many many games, but that insane CL goal Villa made for us to help beat Barcelona? After that it was hard to believe my earlier judgment anymore. Suarez was less convincing at that moment in his career, but he did score 2 or 3 goals at perfect times to make my arguments against him crumble just enough that it made sense Correa or Cunha (yes that one) didn't get the run of games to show how they could improve the side if they got more than just one start in a row.
Hopefully Cunha gets that shot here and takes it.