I read an interesting article on Tyson recently in the guardian: Mike Tyson interview: The iron man melts | Sport | The Observer
It made me think, considering D'matos undeniable influence on Tyson who was for all intents and purposes ferocious and required intensive care and guidance to keep him on his path.
It made me consider how good Tyson could have been, when looking at his record against the very best fighters there is only ever controversy and often failure for Tyson.
Had he not gone off the rails, how good do you think he could have been? Considering the legacy Tyson leaves behind him as the 'baddest man on the planet' and in discussions about him it's hard to hear past 'he'd knock him out in the first three rounds' his actual record leaves much to be desired.
My question, could Tyson have been the greatest of all time - or was he never actually as good as people think?
It made me think, considering D'matos undeniable influence on Tyson who was for all intents and purposes ferocious and required intensive care and guidance to keep him on his path.
It made me consider how good Tyson could have been, when looking at his record against the very best fighters there is only ever controversy and often failure for Tyson.
Had he not gone off the rails, how good do you think he could have been? Considering the legacy Tyson leaves behind him as the 'baddest man on the planet' and in discussions about him it's hard to hear past 'he'd knock him out in the first three rounds' his actual record leaves much to be desired.
My question, could Tyson have been the greatest of all time - or was he never actually as good as people think?