Judas
Open to offers
Too much history to throw it all away, no reason why we shouldn't just improve what we already have, whenever we finally decide to do it.
Wouldn't mind if they put them at the right height, in the SAF stand toilets they're half way up the wall. Walk out looking like you've pissed yourself whenever you use them.The toilets and facilities for us peasant fans (never been corporate so can't comment) are a joke for the 'biggest club in the world'.
Little things like the hand dryers, just put some fecking Dyson ones in FFS, probably make money from sponsorship in some capacity.
At the size United are you never spend your own money. They will raise funds by floating or some other way and borrow the majority of it. United will never be debt free. Its not how businesses are run when they are that big. It may be a balancing act to invest on the pitch and service the debt but thats what they will do as they have done for years already. The fact that we can and have done both already for years. You should not be too concerned about Uniteds owners and funds. Despite the false impression sky try to make out. They really are a well ran club. Its not for nothing we continue to grow year on year especially in our leanest years.When the club is back to winning titles and challenging in the latter stages of the Champions League then Old Trafford should be improved, but not until then.
The money needs to be focused on improving the squad first.
Think its already on the cards buddy, more a case of when than if it will be done.Stadium could do with an upgrade. It does look outdated when compared to other stadiums that are being built.
Do you even lift bro?Wouldn't mind if they put them at the right height, in the SAF stand toilets they're half way up the wall. Walk out looking like you've pissed yourself whenever you use them.
Lukaku wouldn't have that problem.Wouldn't mind if they put them at the right height, in the SAF stand toilets they're half way up the wall. Walk out looking like you've pissed yourself whenever you use them.
Having an 'Old Trafford station' incorporated into the stadium would be an excellent idea. Has any other stadium done this before?Trouble is whilst filling it with around 75000 fans every home game and hosting other non-football events out of season, there is little incentive for the owners to spend money on an upgrade.
The acoustics/PA system are lousy (or its me going a bit 'mutton jeff') sight lines at the top of the third tier awful, also at pitch level its a less attractive view, no display screens (to speak of), toilets antiquated, seat size really for a couple of generations back when only one in 20 was over six foot or over 15st (sorry 95kg). W1 and W2 car parks are a nightmare to get in/out because of the bridge over the canal, all this... yet the pitch is perfect!
I think I remember years ago there was once talk of a massive development to the South Stand (Sir Bobby's Stand now) with plans to incorporate a 4-tier structure and a railway station, taken from a branch line, directly into the ground itself and this would be subterranean feature which on non-match days could be isolated from the main intercity branch lines. The rail line was supposed to be linked to the Hotel development, but that's now gone ahead with Hotel Football, so maybe I was just imagining it?
As for fan disruption, I was one of those moved out of the Stretford end to make way for the third tier, then the paddocks when these were done away with, then the East Stand, when it got an uplift, so upgrade inconvenience over the years meant I've watched matches from every side of the ground at some point.
Not that I am aware of, at least not in the UK! If memory serves me right one of the problems apart from the actual construction/disruption etc. was ownership of the land. The existing rail line that runs parallel to the Ground belong to British Rail (don't know who that would be now?) and they wouldn't or they were not allowed by Government, to sell the land off and United were not going to commit millions to developing land and structures belonging to someone else. I think there were other issues to do with crowd control etc. that finally finished it off. However I am talking nearly 30 years ago, so who knows maybe in todays world things have changed?Having an 'Old Trafford station' incorporated into the stadium would be an excellent idea. Has any other stadium done this before?
I was under the impression that the train line was a freight only line.Having an 'Old Trafford station' incorporated into the stadium would be an excellent idea. Has any other stadium done this before?
Yes, it probably is these days back to freight only, there was a time when 'through' passenger trains used it as a branch line whilst upgrades were carried out on the main passenger routes. Sorry, if I've given the impression about knowing the details of this, it was a long time ago!I was under the impression that the train line was a freight only line.
Basically the Millenium Stadium is the key reason why the builder Laing now goes by the name Laing O'Rourke - the Millenium Stadium broke them.Jesus. .. why did Wembley cost 4 times what it cost to build the Millenium Stadium? It's criminal.
Lessons learnt; Iconic projects aren't very lucrative?Basically the Millenium Stadium is the key reason why the builder Laing now goes by the name Laing O'Rourke - the Millenium Stadium broke them.
Having said that Australian builder Multiplex had a full 'mare at Wembley although I believe that the cost of that wasn't helped by the massive escalation in material costs between the massively drawn out tender process and the project hitting site. At one point it wasn't clear if the iconic arch would work either.
Hmmm im not sure if you imagined it or not but I can tell you this. A train line into Old Trafford where thoes out to cause trouble on a global level could easily take advantage of, currently would be a non-starter. Even if it was a freight line the fact that it lands under a 20K or whatever seater stand is not going to be an attractive option.I think I remember years ago there was once talk of a massive development to the South Stand (Sir Bobby's Stand now) with plans to incorporate a 4-tier structure and a railway station, taken from a branch line, directly into the ground itself and this would be subterranean feature which on non-match days could be isolated from the main intercity branch lines. The rail line was supposed to be linked to the Hotel development, but that's now gone ahead with Hotel Football, so maybe I was just imagining it?
Yes your right, I'm sure the present troubles, especially with its global perspectives would render the idea a non-starter.A train line into Old Trafford where thoes out to cause trouble on a global level could easily take advantage of, currently would be a non-starter
Built for a fixed price IIRC.Basically the Millenium Stadium is the key reason why the builder Laing now goes by the name Laing O'Rourke - the Millenium Stadium broke them.
Having said that Australian builder Multiplex had a full 'mare at Wembley although I believe that the cost of that wasn't helped by the massive escalation in material costs between the massively drawn out tender process and the project hitting site. At one point it wasn't clear if the iconic arch would work either.
Source?I’m hearing they’re adding another three quadrants. Two in the corners, and one in the middle of South Stand. All three quadrants will be joined by another tier of seating. This will mean OT will have five quadrants in total, and the final projected capacity will be 89,750 (ish).
Yea its obviously not something that springs to mind instantly but there was always a threat. Good point.Yes your right, I'm sure the present troubles, especially with its global perspectives would render the idea a non-starter.
I was trying to think back to when the extension of South Stand thing was first muted, think it was in the late 70's and early 1980's, it was when the IRA was on the go, but don't think that was ever a consideration? There were regular 'bomb hoax's at OT I can remember the PA announcing "please look around you, if you see anything suspicious notify a steward" and that was that!
What do they say about the past being another Country?
I thought by pure definition a quadrant is two things, 1)something split in 4, and 2) a piece in the extremity of the domain. ie, you can't have a quadrant in the middle of something!I’m hearing they’re adding another three quadrants. Two in the corners, and one in the middle of South Stand. All three quadrants will be joined by another tier of seating. This will mean OT will have five quadrants in total, and the final projected capacity will be 89,750 (ish).
Nothing a few cranes cant take care of with ease. There are much bigger builds than Old TraffordWhen you look at the size of the roofs, can you imagine the sort of operation needed to take those down!
Sounds like some great ideas there, but not sure the club would shell out for free viewing on giant screens, nice idea though!Multi-teir carpark, both under and above the ground
Nope, pass by it on my way into work...I was under the impression that the train line was a freight only line.
If it was a new stadium i doubt many would care. Most United fans would have a problem with Old Trafford being renamed though.If a new stadium was built you can almost certainly guarantee that naming rights would be involved.
Would the average United fan be okay with that? Wasn't under the impression they would.
Never been to Old Trafford (sadly) but not having to hear a trademarked sponsor is incredibly appealing to me.