Nba 2010-2011

jveezy

Fo' shizzle
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
14,791
Location
Rancho Cordova, California, USA
I think people are holding out to see what happens this weekend. Reports are swirling that Stern is about to lay down the law and that the best deal that the players will ever get from this point on will be offered this weekend. It'll only get worse from here.
 

Danny1982

Sectarian Hipster
Joined
Aug 18, 2009
Messages
15,091
Location
Old Trafford
First two weeks of the season are canceled. NBA says further negotiations will have to take into account the losses caused by this cancellation.

I think it's getting more and more complicated now, but the players position will get only weaker from now on...
 

ha_rooney

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
38,841
Cancelling part of the season was expected, question is whether they can save any part of next season.

I'm not sure how exactly the negotiations work or what they are disagreeing about, but I guess there are more divisions on both sides in this lock-out compared to the NFL lock-out.
 

ha_rooney

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
38,841
It seems like an agreement may be agreed shortly, some optimism that something will happen soon and the season won't be lost.
 

Sean_RedDevil

Twitter bot
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
21,364
Location
NYC (Before Manchester+Hamburg)
It seems like an agreement may be agreed shortly, some optimism that something will happen soon and the season won't be lost.
LA Lakers Facebook
The NBA announced today that it has canceled all games through November 30 because a new collective bargaining agreement has not been reached with the National Basketball Players Association.
..
 

ha_rooney

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
38,841
Well that was unexpected, oh well as long we get 30-40 games and playoffs then it's fine by me.

Edit: apparently they are fighting over 2%. The players want 52% of revenue but the owners want a 50-50 split. If thats the reason for breakdown then it's pathetic.
 

MrMarcello

In a well-ordered universe...
Joined
Dec 26, 2000
Messages
52,787
Location
On a pale blue dot in space
Why hasn't there been an uproar over Gumbel calling Stern a modern day plantation owner trying to hold in his boys (i.e. slaves) yet Limbaugh makes some outlandish comments about McNabb and the media runs with it for weeks?

Double standards.
 

ArmchairCritic

You got pets me too mines are dead
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
16,154
I don't really mind the lockout at the moment despite how petty it seems to be. Let's face it the season is pretty boring nowadays, 30-40 games and the playoffs would be more than enough for me.
 

jveezy

Fo' shizzle
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
14,791
Location
Rancho Cordova, California, USA
I don't really mind the lockout at the moment despite how petty it seems to be. Let's face it the season is pretty boring nowadays, 30-40 games and the playoffs would be more than enough for me.
I actually really enjoyed the last shortened season, though part of that had to do with a completely revamped Kings team.

This year it's more irritating because of the timing. Season tickets sold out in Sacramento in what could be the last season and there's no games to play yet.
 

Zen

Full Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
14,528
All regular seasons can be boring as shit in America because there is very importance on actually winning the regular season, except home advantage, which as the Green Bay Packers proved....isn't that much of an advantage anyway.

The regular season is just basically the stat padding season for the best players.
 

MrMarcello

In a well-ordered universe...
Joined
Dec 26, 2000
Messages
52,787
Location
On a pale blue dot in space
Although the NFL is a much shorter season so every game really matters in the grand scheme. The Packers simply took advantage of their strengths and opponents weaknesses in the playoffs and rode the play of a hot QB.

The playoffs are just a lottery anyhow. It's rare the best team (record-wise) wins the championship in any North American sport.
 

RDCR07

Not a bad guy (Whale Killer)
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
30,410
Location
Transfer Forum
If a basketball season does end up getting underway, would some of you lads be interested in a fantasy league which I will set up on Yahoo?
 

antihenry

CAF GRU Rep
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
7,401
Location
Chelsea FC
Marbury blasts Jordan, calls him a sellout.

Stephon Marbury lays into Michael Jordan once again, calling him a

Jordan, who is said to be leading the charge to not only roll back the NBA's offer of a 50/50 split of basketball-related income with the players in their current negotiations but to possibly vote against any reconciliation with the players should the Players Association take the NBA's current offer, is under harsh criticism for what some see as a hypocritical turn as team owner. Especially considering Jordan's notorious rants against ownership from the other side of the table during the 1998 lockout.

Marbury, as you can probably tell, isn't feeling it.
 

Excal

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
11,285
Location
California in RL, Liverpool in SM
I kind of doubt Jordan is actually "leading" the charge. I think it's been allowed to leak that he is because he's still a bigger name/star than any of the current players, so it buys the owners leverage, both in that it's a former player doing so and that it's Jordan.
 

ha_rooney

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
38,841
Players have rejected the offer and are now going to sue the NBA. From what I read, a lot of people suggested the players should take the 50-50 offer as the terms were not going to get any better.

Now the season looks to have been lost which is a shame but at least it's another year without a ring for 'the king'.
 

jveezy

Fo' shizzle
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
14,791
Location
Rancho Cordova, California, USA
If they were going to decertify, this wasn't the time to do it. They should have done it when the season ended IMO. Now it just seems like a desperate effort to avoid losing even more.

This whole thing has been poorly handled from both sides.
 

gooDevil

Worst scout ever
Joined
Oct 2, 2008
Messages
25,162
Location
The Kids are the Future
I personally am proud of the NBA players union, the owner's proposals were insulting. I agree they waited too long, but they showed good faith by trying to come to an agreement.

Should end how the NFL union legal process ended, on the player's side.

Good for the players for sticking together.
 

Nanderson

I ♥ Neymar
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
1,243
I personally am proud of the NBA players union, the owner's proposals were insulting. I agree they waited too long, but they showed good faith by trying to come to an agreement.

Should end how the NFL union legal process ended, on the player's side.

Good for the players for sticking together.

No, the players are fecking idiots. There is no way they end up with a better deal than this when it's all said and done. No sympathy for either side, but the players have been unbelievably stupid. A lot of them don't even know who their team rep is, or the details of the offer. Incredibly naive and ignorant.
 

gooDevil

Worst scout ever
Joined
Oct 2, 2008
Messages
25,162
Location
The Kids are the Future
Am I mistaken that the NFL players union got their way after they went to court?

From what I read a while ago, once the NFL players won it became fairly clear that it would set a precedent that the NBA union would also get mediation. Though i only read a bit of it.

How is it they won't get a better deal when the NFL players did?
 

gbgary

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
9,707
Location
juuuust outside dallas
Am I mistaken that the NFL players union got their way after they went to court?

From what I read a while ago, once the NFL players won it became fairly clear that it would set a precedent that the NBA union would also get mediation. Though i only read a bit of it.

How is it they won't get a better deal when the NFL players did?
two completely different situations. nothing can be drawn from the nfl settlement that would apply to the nba. the last proposal was 50/50 and a soft cap. i think the players have made a mistake. the owners are trying to get things more level after the last contract. so now the season will be lost and when a deal is made it will probably be something close to this deal (if not the exact deal)...maybe a little worse.
 

gooDevil

Worst scout ever
Joined
Oct 2, 2008
Messages
25,162
Location
The Kids are the Future
Are you sure? I've read several comments from lawyers that say otherwise. The two lawyers that fought the case out for the two sides of the NFL have BOTH joined the players side for this case, and are the lead lawyers, that surely indicated they're extremely related.

Not that I'm familiar with the NFL case, I didn't know they were on strike till it was over.
 

gooDevil

Worst scout ever
Joined
Oct 2, 2008
Messages
25,162
Location
The Kids are the Future
The NBA formally notified teams Tuesday that it has canceled games through Dec. 15, erasing a total of 324 games or 26 percent of the season as the lockout lingers into its fifth month with no end in sight.

The news came only hours before the locked-out players, including stars Carmelo Anthony and Kevin Durant, filed class-action antitrust lawsuits against the league on Tuesday in at least two states, moving pro basketball's labor dispute from the negotiating table to federal court.

Attorney David Boies, who represented the NFL during that sport's work stoppage and now has been brought aboard by basketball's players, said the NBA lockout violates antitrust laws by refusing to allow players to work.

Boies added that Stern's ultimatum to the now-disbanded union to accept the owners' last economic model or face a harsher proposal "turned out to be a mistake" that strengthens the players' case because it proves that the collective bargaining process had ended.

"If you're in a poker game, and you run a bluff, and the bluff works, you're a hero. If someone calls your bluff, you lose. I think the owners overplayed their hand," Boies said at the players' association headquarters. "They did a terrific job of taking a very hard line and pushing the players to make concession after concession after concession, but greed is not only a terrible thing -- it's a dangerous thing."

Dangerous enough to cost the league billions of dollars in damages if players win.

The players are seeking "treble damages" -- meaning triple the amount of the more than $2 billion they would have made under a full 2011-12 season -- for what they argue is irreparable harm by preventing them from playing in their "very short" NBA careers.

"We haven't seen Mr. Boies' complaint yet, but it's a shame that the players have chosen to litigate instead of negotiate," NBA spokesman Tim Frank said in a statement. "They warned us from the early days of these negotiations that they would sue us if we didn't satisfy them at the bargaining table, and they appear to have followed through on their threats."

Boies acknowledged that the case could take months, but hoped there would be a settlement before too long.

"Nobody can tell you how long it's going to take. We all know it's possible to delay lawsuits for a while, but I think it is in everybody's interest to try to resolve this promptly," said Boies, speaking on behalf of the California filing. "The longer it goes on, the greater the damages that the teams will face, the greater the damages that the players will suffer, and perhaps most important of all, the longer basketball fans will be deprived of basketball. So we hope that this will move quickly."

He insisted the players have shown their willingness to negotiate throughout.

"You can't negotiate by yourself," he said. "You can only negotiate if you've got somebody who's willing to sit down and negotiate with you."

[The plaintiffs] argue in the Minnesota filing that the lockout "constitutes an illegal group boycott, price-fixing agreement, and/or restraint of trade in violation of the Sherman Act" and that the owners' final offer for a new CBA would have "wiped out the competitive market for most NBA players."

The two suits -- one filed in conjunction with the players' association in the Northern District of California and another filed in Minnesota -- likely were filed with a favorable venue in mind.

The Minnesota district court has been favorable to the NFLPA during litigation dating to the 1980s. The federal court in San Francisco is under the jurisdiction of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, considered the most liberal of the 13 circuit courts.

The NBA already has filed a pre-emptive lawsuit in New York seeking to prove the lockout is legal and likely would push for cases to be moved there to gain the legal home court.

Though Stern has ridiculed the players' "losing" strategy, Boies said he believes NBA players have a stronger case than NFL players did. Their decertification, he said, could have been argued as a sham because they walked out on the bargaining process before it was technically over and brought litigation. He said Stern's actions left NBA players without options beyond seeking legal relief.

"Here you had an ultimatum from the owners that made absolutely clear that the collective bargaining process was over," he said, adding that Stern's threat is quoted in the lawsuit. "That's not collective bargaining, and so you have a very distinct set of facts here."

The California filing says that in 2007, Stern met with union negotiators and demanded the players reduce their revenue share from 57 percent to no more than 50 percent and "insisted on a much more restrictive salary cap, which would restrict the market for player services."

Stern threatened at that meeting, according to the lawsuit, that the league was "prepared to lock out the players for two years to get everything" that the NBA owners sought and that "the deal would only get worse after the lockout."

The league locked out its players on July 1. Tuesday marked the 138th day of the lockout and the players' first missed paycheck. The season was scheduled to start Nov. 1.

The league's latest proposal, which was rejected by the players on Monday, called for a reduced 72-game season to start Dec. 15.

ESPN's Stephen A. Smith completely disagrees with the NBPA's strategy. Despite the reporting, Smith still thinks a deal will get done.

Although the NFL was able to get its recent labor dispute resolved quickly enough to lose only one preseason game, the NHL lost the entire 2004-05 season, and the NBA's last work stoppage led to a 50-game season in 1998-99.

Boies said players will not seek a preliminary injunction to lift the lockout. Because the lockout "arguably grew out of prior collective bargaining discussions," Boies said he believes it would be very difficult to get a court to immediately halt the lockout and such a path would delay the case.

Anthony and Chauncey Billups of the Knicks, NBA scoring leader Durant, rookie Kawhi Leonard and Grizzlies forward Leon Powe were listed as plaintiffs in the complaint filed in conjunction with the players' association in the Northern District of California against the NBA and the owners of its 30 teams. That case has been assigned for now to U.S. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu in Oakland, Calif.

Timberwolves forward Anthony Tolliver, Pistons guard Ben Gordon, free agent forward Caron Butler and Derrick Williams -- the second overall draft pick by Minnesota in June who has yet to sign a rookie contract because of the lockout -- were listed as plaintiffs in another lawsuit filed against the league and owners in Minneapolis, where NFL players had some level of success in a similar court proceeding this summer.

Boies said there might be other, similar cases to those filed on behalf of NBA players in California and Minnesota. The ideal scenario, he said, would be to bring them all together in the Northern District of California.

The plaintiffs represent various types of players affected by lockout -- those under contract, free agents and rookies.

They argue in the Minnesota filing that the lockout "constitutes an illegal group boycott, price-fixing agreement, and/or restraint of trade in violation of the Sherman Act" and that the owners' final offer for a new CBA would have "wiped out the competitive market for most NBA players."

Boies said the lawsuit was an attempt to restore competitive free-market conditions

Players made numerous economic concessions and were willing to meet the owners' demands of a 50-50 split of basketball-related income -- a transfer of about $280 million annually from their feeling the league's desires to improve competitive balance would hurt their guaranteed 57 percent under the old deal -- but only if the owners met them on their system wishes.

Owners wanted to keep more of the league's nearly $4 billion in basketball revenues. And they sought a system where even the smallest-market clubs could compete, believing the current system would always favor the teams who could spend the most.

And Boies said it was those owners who put the league in this position.

"If it were up to the players, there would be games being played right now," he said. "There is one reason and one reason only that the season is in jeopardy and that is because the owners have locked the players out and have maintained that lockout for several months.

"If there's not a basketball season, responsibility for that lies in one place and one place only, and that is the NBA and the NBA owners because they're the ones who are keeping the players from playing."
..
 

jveezy

Fo' shizzle
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
14,791
Location
Rancho Cordova, California, USA
Ladies and gentlemen, we have a deal. The season will start on Christmas Day. Not sure what the terms are yet, but I believe they're holding a press conference right now.

Edit: The deal still does have to be ratified on both sides by a vote. Also the schedule will be redone, not cut off.

Edit II: 66 games it looks like.

Edit III: Free agency and camps start on December 9th