UnrelatedPsuedo
I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
This whole issue is really fcuking boring.
(Yes boring enough to reply)
(Yes boring enough to reply)
Depends what you mean by 'these types" though. Even if guys were more willing to call out their own friends for inappropriate behaviour it would help. The reality is that a lot of people who consider themselves "decent humans" turn a blind eye to behaviour they shouldn't when people they know do it, even if it's relatively minor stuff.Not sure calling people out works in a real world situation. 6 months ago I stepped in to stop 2 youths racially abusing a shopkeeper from Pakistan. 2 days later I was jumped by 4 youths and ended up with a broken ankle. Just back to work last week because of it. These types aren't going to be moved by an ad or by the intervention of others. They are just bad eggs. The content of the ad is fine but the practical behaviour in real world settings in most of those situations is going to get you into a lot of physical altercations. Things like this are only ever going to piss off the people who don't act like this and are never going to change the behaviour of those that do. I don't act like this to people but outside of me being a decent human and keeping the company of decent humans I have no idea how I'm meant to change the behaviour of those who decide to be pricks.
Nah, you just love to "pretend" to play Devil's Advocate on these subjects, even when you're completely wrong.That’s where you’re going wrong. I don’t think that. It’s just an example of how bad this stuff looks when applied to another group.
I’m assuming these are including unsolicited dick pics. In which case it seems entirely plausible.What's the source on this? I find it extremely hard to believe 1 in 3 women are getting knobs flashed at them.
Great entertainment though. Through one of the Peterson videos in the Peterson\Shapiro thread I stumbled upon the phenonemon of characters such as "triggleypuff" and "big red" on YouTube.Third wave feminism is a mental disorder
Why's that?Third wave feminism is a mental disorder
He just heard some alt-right grifter say it and thought it sounded clever.Why's that?
Why's that?
No, I say it because it’s true.He just heard some alt-right grifter say it and thought it sounded clever.
I had no idea, and who cares.“*some left wing thing I don’t like* is a mental disorder” is literally an alt-right catchphrase.
What’s your idea of feminism that you hate so much?I had no idea, and who cares.
Anyway, I am not some alt-righter no matter how much you want me to be. My political views lean towards the left. I just think feminists are idiots, which is a fairly popular opinion (yet a politically incorrect one).
Where do I begin.What’s your idea of feminism that you hate so much?
You sure those aren’t the extremists of that movement? Lot of the feminists I know are often engaged with abortion rights and equal pay and things of that sort. And of course speaking out against Trump for obvious reasons.Where do I begin.
1. They claim to fight sexism yet it’s blatantly obvious that they hate men. Terms like “mansplaining” is textbook sexism.
2. Want to control free speech. They actively try to stop people with a different opinion from speaking in public settings like universities.
3. They actively try to ban things they dislike, such as video games, grid girls, strip clubs, whatever you can think of. Feminists love to ban things.
I find it difficult to differentiate extremist feminists from normal feminists, since normal feminists regularly defend the actions of extremist feminists and rarely criticize them.You sure those aren’t the extremists of that movement?
The wage gap is a myth (at least the way feminists explain it). Abortion rights? I'm all for it.Lot of the feminists I know are often engaged with abortion rights and equal pay and things of that sort. And of course speaking out against Trump for obvious reasons.
I find the term mansplaining to be unironically sexist.Also how else would you label something like “mansplaining”? Do you think it’s not an issue at all or is the label itself?
Not saying it’s right but this behavior of not calling out extremists in unison isn’t limited to just feminists.I find it difficult to differentiate extremist feminists from normal feminists, since normal feminists regularly defend the actions of extremist feminists and rarely criticize them.
When extremist feminists ban GTA 5 or ban grid girls, the normal feminists usually defend them.
Depends on how you frame wage gap. Some figures I’ve seen that take total averages for a whole nation is skewed because the job types and indistries aren’t all equal. However you could probably show evidence in a specifc job position, though I’m on my phone so I’m not in the mood to search for a citation. But I can say anecdotally that I knew female database managers at a former company who were getting paid just a tad bit more than what I was getting for literally copy and pasting word doc articles into a CMS. It’s more than just a myth if you ask me.The wage gap is a myth (at least the way feminists explain it). Abortion rights? I'm all for it.
Depends on context. I assume the majority of complaints is against men who try to explain something to a woman as if they’re a little child. Idk man, I’ve seen it plenty and I’ve probably had my fair share of moments in the past doing the same. Hell, I see used to see it all the time with my dad to my mom back when they were still together. To equate it to the same level of sexism that is being brought up seems more like point scoring in semantics.I find the term mansplaining to be unironically sexist.
Feminists often talk about "toxic masculinity" and how men should behave, as if they know what it's like to be a man. That is basically "womansplaining".
To be honest I would never have to stop one of my mates from doing this. I'm sure we've all had our stupid moments when younger but certainly not now. I do think it's a problem because our friend group is pretty much 50/50 gender wise and all of the lads have had to step in to stop guys hassling the girls before. I wouldn't be mates with guys like this and to be honest the probably keep very different company too.Depends what you mean by 'these types" though. Even if guys were more willing to call out their own friends for inappropriate behaviour it would help. The reality is that a lot of people who consider themselves "decent humans" turn a blind eye to behaviour they shouldn't when people they know do it, even if it's relatively minor stuff.
For example, back when I was about 19 I remember a girl I knew asking if she could sit beside me in the cab home as she didn't want to sit beside one of my friends as he was being "handsy". I said yeah and agreed that he was being a creepy feck. I didn't say anything to him about it though, even though this was the third time I'd heard girls mention him being inappropriate.
Calling him out on it wouldn't really have cost me anything and I wouldn't have been at all surprised if having his friends say he was being a creep improved his behaviour, so I really should have spoken to him about it. Immature as I was at the time though I didn't feel comfortable doing so, especially in the midst of a gang of lads who also hadn't said anything. In fact I would have certainly found it much easier to intervene if I saw a stranger doing something wrong, even if that posed actual physical risk, because I was an idiot child.
So yeah, I think the message that "good" men could and should do more to call out poor behaviour in others is a very fair one and I certainly don't feel under attack because a fecking Gillette add pointed it out to me.
Nah it's notThe fact you even think it's equivalent is racist.
A call to action for men to be better men is not the same as tarnishing men with a broad stroke as if we are all animals. Yall are taking this way too personally.
I didn't think it would go down very well on here, but ah well. Let's agree to disagree.The massive power imbalance between the two groups that it fails to take into account. One is the most powerful group in the western world, by a wide margin, the other is among the weakest.
Crime rates being higher among black people isn't because they're black, but because of poverty (which, in turn, has a lot to do with them being black, because racism). Suggesting that it's because black people think it's okay to commit crime or to be a criminal is massively racist.
The fact that it highlights black-on-white crime (the only crimes committed by black people that white people care about, I guess) and that it's trying to equate feminism to racism are also massive red flags. The person who made it is without a doubt a racist and a sexist.
Sure, but is there any reason to call on all men to sort the rest of our kind out? Why is it somehow the responsibility of innocent bystanders to act as vigilantes, just because we happen to be the same gender? People sexually harass women because they're cnuts, not because they're men. Just like any black person who commits a crime does so because they are a criminal, and not because of their race.That’s a different discussion but nobody is calling all men misogynistic assholes and misogny clearly isn’t an issue that is exclusive to our ancestors. Loads of examples of it still being an issue among young men today. There’s been a bunch of stories coming out of universities in recent years of rugby clubs and the like behaving obnoxiously towards female students.
And, as people keep saying, it’s not about saying all men behave badly. That’s obviously not the case. Some men do behave badly, hence it’s worth reminding all men it’s not on to be a dick to wonen. Think of it like speed limits. Plenty of people can safely drive without regard for speed limits but the roads are safer when everyone is constantly reminded that speeding puts others at risk.
Not sure what you mean?Nah, you just love to "pretend" to play Devil's Advocate on these subjects, even when you're completely wrong.
At least the likes of botond and redman are consistently honest with where they stand, rather than pretending to be some imaginary middle ground like yourself.
You are confusing feminism with a tiny minority that are the feminazis.Where do I begin.
1. They claim to fight sexism yet it’s blatantly obvious that they hate men. Terms like “mansplaining” is textbook sexism.
2. Want to control free speech. They actively try to stop people with a different opinion from speaking in public settings like universities.
3. They actively try to ban things they dislike, such as video games, grid girls, strip clubs, whatever you can think of. Feminists love to ban.
They are cancerous to society.
That's textbook alt-right/MRA stuff. Feminism is an umbrella term for a ton of different thoughts and ideologies. There are some subjects most agree on, but there are a lot of disagreements within the ideology, with incompatible ideas and even ones that contradict each other. Hating feminism, or labeling third wave feminism as a mental disorder is exceptionally childish, not to mention incredibly ignorant. Especially when your basis for doing so seems to be a bunch of ideas not held by a majority of feminists.No, I say it because it’s true.
Feminism is full of hypocrisy and denial of reality. They are idiots.
This is not some kind of unpopular opinion by the way. Not everyone who dislikes feminism is some alt-right grifter. Most of my political views align with the left.
Most feminists fight for equality, that includes the fight for fathers to have as much right to be with their children as the mothers following divorces, as well as other issues were men get the short end of the stick.Where do I begin.
1. They claim to fight sexism yet it’s blatantly obvious that they hate men. Terms like “mansplaining” is textbook sexism.
Literally every group out there does this. Statistically, conservatives are more likely to do it than anyone, so I take it you hate them as well?2. Want to control free speech. They actively try to stop people with a different opinion from speaking in public settings like universities.
Again, it's not like wanting to ban they don't like is unique to feminists. A huge difference is that strip clubs have a huge problem with exploiting vulnerable girls, human trafficking and such, so there's a valid argument for doing away with them. Where's the valid argument for doing away with gay marriage? I take it you go after groups that try to have gay marriage or abortions banned with the same vigor and venom?3. They actively try to ban things they dislike, such as video games, grid girls, strip clubs, whatever you can think of. Feminists love to ban.
I'd argue that the kind of views you're espousing here are a much bigger problem than the fringe views you've decided to attribute to feminism as a whole.They are cancerous to society.
I really won't spend my Saturday discussing with you, but I just wanted to point out that there is a huge disparity when it comes to sex crimes as well, something that can't be equated to poverty. *but because of poverty
Yeah, I quoted a factual study from National Criminal Justice Reference Service. I should have remembered that the truth is often racist, my bad. We should edit the study so it becomes less racist.The racists are really crawling out of the woodwork now.
So what do you think that huge disparity is down to then?I really won't spend my Saturday discussing with you, but I just wanted to point out that there is a huge disparity when it comes to sex crimes as well, something that can't be equated to poverty. *
* https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=96748
No idea. What do you think?So what do you think that huge disparity is down to then?
I'm sure you have completely none racist reasons for posting that in response to a post about why black people might have higher crime stats because of poverty with a disclaimer that you aren't actually going to discuss it.Yeah, I quoted a factual study from National Criminal Justice Reference Service. I should have remembered that the truth is often racist, my bad.
As you were then.
I am sure your initative to discuss with me, when there is nothing to discuss since a claim was posted, and I corrected it, has nothing to do with your political views as well.I'm sure you have completely none racist reasons for posting that in response to a post about why black people might have higher crime stats because of poverty with a disclaimer that you aren't actually going to discuss it.
I'd presume things like a lack of education among people who are in poverty would be a major factor. Unless you can identify something else, it looks like you're suggesting it's down to race. Which would obviously be...well, racist.No idea. What do you think?
My political view is that I don't like racists, you seem to have just admitted that you were motivated by your racist political views. We aren't going to get far.I am sure your initative to discuss with me, when there is nothing to discuss since a claim was posted, and I corrected it, has nothing to do with your political views as well.
Or maybe something to do with different cultures having different attitudes towards women and all that..?I'd presume things like a lack of education among people who are in poverty would be a major factor. Unless you can identify something else, it looks like you're suggesting it's down to race. Which would obviously be...well, racist.
Give it another go, I am certain you can sneak "racist" in there a few more times.We aren't going to get far.
'Culture' is quite arbitrary though - unless you think black Americans can all fit into one, homogenised black culture across the entire country. The culture of groups of people is undoubtedly going to be informed by the circumstances in which those people grow up and the world around them. In America black people have faced systemic discrimination for centuries to the point where it's only a couple of generations ago they were recognised as being equal to white people. If you're systematically discriminated against you're going to find yourself in a position of poverty. If you're in poverty, you're not going to get a good education, or you're much more unlikely to. If you don't get a good education, you're much less likely to have been taught the wrongs of sexual assault.Or maybe something to do with different cultures having different attitudes towards women and all that..?
Again...if you don't think that social circumstances (like poverty) are somewhat responsible for the figures here, then what do you think? Do you believe that black people are inherently more likely to commit sexual assault? Or would you concede that the circumstances an individual grows up in and the education he receives is likely to impact his/her later behaviour?Yeah, you have all contributed with a whole lot of actual factual evidence to solidify your stance here people.
Let me know when you have something actually measurable that can be used for comparison and actual debate in between all the infantile labels.