Skåre Willoch
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2014
- Messages
- 4,226
Exactly. They should be able to try and equalise, and if they can't then so be it.I can't understand the reasoning behind it?
What could possibly be the problem with Chiefs getting a single possession to try and equalise there?
6 rings baby.
Don't you think that the 2nd team getting the ball would have an advantage knowing they have to go on 4th down. It can never be totally equal, somebody always has an edge.how can you not want to see mahomes, the mvp of the league, have a chance to tie the game there?
not totally equal but better than this. or here's an idea. they just play another quarter, regardless of scoreDon't you think that the 2nd team getting the ball would have an advantage knowing they have to go on 4th down. It can never be totally equal, somebody always has an edge.
I suggested it earlier tbf and nobody was bothered then. But because the Pats won...not totally equal but better than this. or here's an idea. they just play another quarter, regardless of score
I am fine by that. Just don't think it is as big of a deal as everybody makes it to be. If your defence sucks, you deserve to lose also.not totally equal but better than this. or here's an idea. they just play another quarter, regardless of score
It's not even close to the same advantage. The team in possession first just has to go for it and assume the opposition will score with their possession.Don't you think that the 2nd team getting the ball would have an advantage knowing they have to go on 4th down. It can never be totally equal, somebody always has an edge.
get a grip.I suggested it earlier tbf and nobody was bothered then. But because the Pats won...
but that only applies to one team in the current systemI am fine by that. Just don't think it is as big of a deal as everybody makes it to be. If your defence sucks, you deserve to lose also.
Salty?get a grip.
buddy, ive been harping on this for years. even in the earlier game. the world doesnt revolve around your postsSalty?
Relax brobuddy, ive been harping on this for years. even in the earlier game. the world doesnt revolve around your posts
look at me, just saying that because i knew that several hours later the patriots would win in overtime and not because its an opinion i holdimagine how cool this would be with college rules
Good for you. Don’t take things so personally man.look at me, just saying that because i knew that several hours later the patriots would win in overtime and not because its an opinion i hold
What's the likelihood of scoring a td on a drive? Less than 30%? It is only meaningful in cases when both teams would score a td, happens less than 10% of times. And if it is changed there is advantage to other direction.but that only applies to one team in the current system
you quoted me, fella. im just responding to you.Good for you. Don’t take things so personally man.
its just that there are better systems out there and most everyone knows it and we are stuck with a bad one for no good reason.What's the likelihood of scoring a td on a drive? Less than 30%? It is only meaningful in cases when both teams would score a td, happens less than 10% of times. And if it is changed there is advantage to other direction.
Change is probably slightly better, but the outrage is unproportional.
What a horrible idea.Best way to decide it would be a a “kick out”
The kickers on each teams get 5 tries from 50 yards, whoever makes most wins, then sudden death. Basically same rules as a penalty shootout. That way it can justify their salaries
Yeah and you took exception to my post initially. Who cares.you quoted me, fella. im just responding to you.
Patriots would have an even high success rate with this, imagine how much Belichick would have the boys practicing this shitBest way to decide it would be a a “kick out”
The kickers on each teams get 5 tries from 50 yards, whoever makes most wins, then sudden death. Basically same rules as a penalty shootout. That way it can justify their salaries
Yeah and when they continue to win everyone will want the rules changed againPatriots would have an even high success rate with this, imagine how much Belichick would have the boys practicing this shit
It’s fairer than a coin tossWhat a horrible idea.
He's the new Dandy Don Meredith but needs a nickname. How about Terrific Tony Romo?I love listening to Tony Romo too. The way he called that play to Gronk was mad
Reddit says “Tony Romstrodamus”He's the new Dandy Don Meredith but needs a nickname. How about Terrific Tony Romo?
People are forgetting that KC gave up 3 separate 3&10 3rd down conversions too. If they weren’t so bad they could have had their chance to win it.First team gets possession and they have one drive to score a touchdown. Kicks don't count and no extra points. Whether or not the first team score, possession is given to the second team who have the same one drive to try and score. This continues on a one drive, sudden death basis until one team scores and the other doesn't.
There's no real advantage to either side. No reason for one side not to take a risk on fourth down and no huge advantage to winning the toss. It's simple as feck and would remove the total anticlimax of endings like tonights.
I think you're struggling to look beyond the teams involved tonight to see the shitness of the rule.People are forgetting that KC gave up 3 separate 3&10 3rd down conversions too. If they weren’t so bad they could have had their chance to win it.
new england gave up 31 points in one half. fact is that one team had a chance to win it in overtime and the other didnt based on a coin flipPeople are forgetting that KC gave up 3 separate 3&10 3rd down conversions too. If they weren’t so bad they could have had their chance to win it.
They also had 3 chances to stop them and get the ball back but failed.new england gave up 31 points in one half. fact is that one team had a chance to win it in overtime and the other didnt based on a coin flip
again, only one team had to be in that situation and it was not due to skill or whatever. it was due to a coinflipThey also had 3 chances to stop them and get the ball back but failed.
New England had multiple opportunities to score a touchdown. If they had failed should they have automatically lost the game?They also had 3 chances to stop them and get the ball back but failed.
Tbf both teams had an equal chance of getting the opportunity in the first place. NE won the toss, just have to deal with it.again, only one team had to be in that situation and it was not due to skill or whatever. it was due to a coinflip