HookedOnAPhelan
Full Member
Nobody cares you bald prick.
Provided years of entertainment through one video clip"He knows how I admire him and his career, what he has done for this country where I'm living and training."
What exactly has Steven Gerrard actually done for this country?
he sometimes puts Phil Collins on in night clubs, so there is that"He knows how I admire him and his career, what he has done for this country where I'm living and training."
What exactly has Steven Gerrard actually done for this country?
Legendary post. A contender for the post of the year.He's definitely unhinged. He's one Geoff Shreeves shitc**t question away from booking himself on a flight to Turkey for a hair transplant and living the rest of his life in a commune in South America in relative anonymity.
Reminds of the whole Catalan ribbon he used to wear and how unhinged he became whenever questioned about it.He is great at acting guilty for someone so innocent.
We know they are guilty. Why wait?I think if they are found guilty, it's time for another purge.
He upset one of the media’s love children and was forced to apologize. It’s as hollow as his weekly excuses. He is getting very tiresome now. It’s time for him to move to Dubai and not return.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
There's sarcasm dripping through the lies - I do not believe there was any 'respect' for Gerrard - not in the original presser, not in the apology. That said, I don't know where we're going with you defending Pep and me defending Gerrard. Perhaps there's better things to do.He's not bantering - he's even saying out of respect for Gerrard, he didn't want that incident to happen. But he's mentioning it because they're talking about stripping away City's titles, and he's (wrongfully) on the defensive suggesting "are we to blame for that slip too?" in a facetious way.
This post is stupid.I don’t understand this really. FairPlay is stupid, they have the money why can’t they spend it. It’s made the premier league even better, I mean it’s produced Arteta whose doing brilliantly at arsenal.
It produced a great rivalry with Liverpool who were magnificent and it’s raising the bar with us. The Premier League shooting themselves in the foot, would Liverpool end up with 3 extra leagues? .
Bolded the only correct part of this post…I don’t understand this really. FairPlay is stupid, they have the money why can’t they spend it. It’s made the premier league even better, I mean it’s produced Arteta whose doing brilliantly at arsenal.
It produced a great rivalry with Liverpool who were magnificent and it’s raising the bar with us. The Premier League shooting themselves in the foot, would Liverpool end up with 3 extra leagues? .
I don’t understand this really. FairPlay is stupid, they have the money why can’t they spend it. It’s made the premier league even better, I mean it’s produced Arteta whose doing brilliantly at arsenal.
It produced a great rivalry with Liverpool who were magnificent and it’s raising the bar with us. The Premier League shooting themselves in the foot, would Liverpool end up with 3 extra leagues? .
I reckon we need a bot that instalty posts this after every Pep-conference.Nobody cares you bald prick.
The funny part is this is what 99% of the City fans are pretty much using as a defense.I don’t understand this really. FairPlay is stupid, they have the money why can’t they spend it. It’s made the premier league even better, I mean it’s produced Arteta whose doing brilliantly at arsenal.
It produced a great rivalry with Liverpool who were magnificent and it’s raising the bar with us. The Premier League shooting themselves in the foot, would Liverpool end up with 3 extra leagues? .
We have the best league in the world because of foreign wealth, if they want to inject their wealth into the beautiful game then why not.This post is stupid.
Because if a billionaire wants to inject his wealth into a small club that doesn't generate enough revenue they become reliant on the owner, what happens if he decides to stop funding them or sell the club and another billionaire doesn't want to fund them?We have the best league in the world because of foreign wealth, if they want to inject their wealth into the beautiful game then why not.
Why should only clubs like us, Barcelona and real madrid be protected because of our huge turnovers.
The romantics argue city are plastic and soulless but they have been breathtaking for the last 6 years and have taken the league up levels. Yes the money seems excessive but this is football, it won’t change.
In the short-term, the bolded part is fine. In the long-term though, it will destroy the league as literally no-one will be able to compete. You just need to look at the German and French leagues as examples.We have the best league in the world because of foreign wealth, if they want to inject their wealth into the beautiful game then why not.
Why should only clubs like us, Barcelona and real madrid be protected because of our huge turnovers.
The romantics argue city are plastic and soulless but they have been breathtaking for the last 6 years and have taken the league up levels. Yes the money seems excessive but this is football, it won’t change.
Yes, like Chelsea destroyed the league. The purchase with oil money propelled us into the best league in the world.In the short-term, the bolded part is fine. In the long-term though, it will destroy the league as literally no-one will be able to compete. You just need to look at the German and French leagues as examples.
I think they're separate things in here in regards to the allegations. Like it's not Pep's responsibility to ensure City account for his entire salary in the correct manner.Is he himself (and other players) in trouble for not declaring his full salary? If so, he would be really stressed right now. Would explain the even more than babbling.
Don't even think peps salary is in question, it's Mancini'sI think they're separate things in here in regards to the allegations. Like it's not Pep's responsibility to ensure City account for his entire salary in the correct manner.
Nor would it be any fault of City if he didn't declare the additional income. The first is accounting fraud done by City, the second is tax fraud done by Pep.
Unless there was evidence of some sort of collusion going on, but I don't think the motive behind the additional salary payments were so the managers could avoid declaring income.
We know Mancini's is in there but there are 8 charges specific to manager remuneration, they might all be for Mancini but seems a high number.Don't even think peps salary is in question, it's Mancini's
Yeah you're right. I was just making the point on the hypothetical from the original post.Don't even think peps salary is in question, it's Mancini's
You conflate two arguments.We have the best league in the world because of foreign wealth, if they want to inject their wealth into the beautiful game then why not.
Why should only clubs like us, Barcelona and real madrid be protected because of our huge turnovers.
The romantics argue city are plastic and soulless but they have been breathtaking for the last 6 years and have taken the league up levels. Yes the money seems excessive but this is football, it won’t change.
You are confusing 2 separate argumentsWe have the best league in the world because of foreign wealth, if they want to inject their wealth into the beautiful game then why not.
Why should only clubs like us, Barcelona and real madrid be protected because of our huge turnovers.
The romantics argue city are plastic and soulless but they have been breathtaking for the last 6 years and have taken the league up levels. Yes the money seems excessive but this is football, it won’t change.
Exactly.You conflate two arguments.
1. should there be FFP.
2. Do rules apply to all or is it OK to break the rules cover up the fact you have broken them and gain a serious and obvious advantage over the others who follow the rules.
City agreed to follow Premier league rules and are accused of deliberately and systematically breaking them over decades.
What next? We did sneak on an extra player but oh the football we played was so much better that it churlish of anyone to bring it up now! let everyone play with an extra man if they want.
So then Bayern and Dortmund would be miles ahead of the other teams how is that fair play? Sounds like what you want is league titles being based on whichever team has the richest billionaire willing to pump loads of money inYes, like Chelsea destroyed the league. The purchase with oil money propelled us into the best league in the world.
The German and French leagues need this kind of ownership to challenge Bayern and PSG, I mean ffs isn’t that fairplay.
If a multi billionaire brought Dortmund it would make that league even better, thats the idea of fairplay not making sure nobody can challenge Bayern.
It shows sport washing works. They’re hit with 100 charges for cheating but answering it all on the pitch is all that matters.Did Rio really just say Pep would shut people up if he won the Champions League? Not the best timing there Rio, ya big dope.
FairThere's sarcasm dripping through the lies - I do not believe there was any 'respect' for Gerrard - not in the original presser, not in the apology. That said, I don't know where we're going with you defending Pep and me defending Gerrard. Perhaps there's better things to do.
What, as opposed to league titles being based on whichever team brings in the most income based on "organic sources"?So then Bayern and Dortmund would be miles ahead of the other teams how is that fair play? Sounds like what you want is league titles being based on whichever team has the richest billionaire willing to pump loads of money in