Chief123
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
- Messages
- 12,789
It really doesn’t.The last point applies for any top player.
It really doesn’t.The last point applies for any top player.
Because some of us can be rationally appreciative of players that aren’t Man Utd.Why is everyone drooling over Haaland so much on a Manchester United forum? It's getting weird. Even when he misses a host of chances you lot somehow make him out to be the best player of the game. That's what's bizarre. I'm not even criticising him really, I'm just saying that he didn't take them to the next level.
Every player has weaker games. Haaland was handled very well at the Bernabeu and spurned his chances tonight. City would have won this game with Alvarez, too, because they were absolutely dominant and didn't let Madrid lay a glove on them.
The biggest difference I'd say is that since Pep changed his formation to 3-2-4-1 with the half-backs, nobody can get near them. Beaten Real Madrid 4-0, Liverpool 4-1, Arsenal 4-1 and Bayern Munich 3-0. This is probably the highest level they've ever hit. Real Madrid were actually pretty impressive in the CL up to this point, they were just blown away by City like everyone else.I'm not convinced. To point out the most obvious thing: City scored five goals in two games against Real Madrid in the semi-finals last season - exactly the same as this season. They scored 99 league goals; this year they're at 92 with three games to go so it's going to be a similar total. Scoring goals wasn't really the problem.
Honestly, the biggest difference is that Real Madrid are quite a bit worse than a year ago - and even then they only scraped through by the skin of their teeth against a City side that outplayed them for most of the tie.
It goes way beyond that.Because some of us can be rationally appreciative of players that aren’t Man Utd.
It does, if you're a good player, other players would be attracted to stopping you leaving spaces for others, but thats not the full story as in the first leg Rudiger was piratically man marking Haaland to much success.It really doesn’t.
Yeah, that definitely played a big part. He's ahead of the curve, the bald bastard and I can't wait for him to feck off to... anywhere else. Still, Real Madrid have definitely declined.The biggest difference I'd say is that since Pep changed his formation to 3-2-4-1 with the half-backs, nobody can get near them. Beaten Real Madrid 4-0, Liverpool 4-1, Arsenal 4-1 and Bayern Munich 3-0. This is probably the highest level they've ever hit. Real Madrid were actually pretty impressive in the CL up to this point, they were just blown away by City like everyone else.
I think you're right but we'll see how it is next season when teams are in better form, most of the teams you mentioned apart from Arsenal are a shadow of the team they were just two years ago.The biggest difference I'd say is that since Pep changed his formation to 3-2-4-1 with the half-backs, nobody can get near them. Beaten Real Madrid 4-0, Liverpool 4-1, Arsenal 4-1 and Bayern Munich 3-0. This is probably the highest level they've ever hit. Real Madrid were actually pretty impressive in the CL up to this point, they were just blown away by City like everyone else.
This is 100% correct. As someone who has watched most of City’s games, the change in consistency and control of games since Pep deployed the full back playing in a box midfield has been very noticeable. Game changing in fact. Teams can’t even lay a glove on them when they are on it.The biggest difference I'd say is that since Pep changed his formation to 3-2-4-1 with the half-backs, nobody can get near them. Beaten Real Madrid 4-0, Liverpool 4-1, Arsenal 4-1 and Bayern Munich 3-0. This is probably the highest level they've ever hit. Real Madrid were actually pretty impressive in the CL up to this point, they were just blown away by City like everyone else.
City are about to win the league for the 5th time in 6 years. Teams being in better form previously has made no difference.I think you're right but we'll see how it is next season when teams are in better form, most of the teams you mentioned apart from Arsenal are a shadow of the team they were just two years ago.
They also put 4 past Real last season but conceded 3. That is the difference not Haaland.The reason they are more ruthless is because Haaland has signed. If Haaland isn’t scoring, he is two defenders marking him leaving a lot of room for other players to move into.
Last year, Man City didn’t have anyone around the penalty spot waiting. It meant centre backs could leave their position and help out the full backs. They cannot do that now or he moved into space therefore players like Grealish and Silva are left one v one against full backs and dominating them.
It’s no coincidence this will be their first UCL and first treble, the first year of Haaland’s Man City career.
Real were very very lucky in the ucl last season as has been the case a few times previously.I'm not convinced. To point out the most obvious thing: City scored five goals in two games against Real Madrid in the semi-finals last season - exactly the same as this season. They scored 99 league goals; this year they're at 92 with three games to go so it's going to be a similar total. Scoring goals wasn't really the problem.
Honestly, the biggest difference is that Real Madrid are quite a bit worse than a year ago - and even then they only scraped through by the skin of their teeth against a City side that outplayed them for most of the tie.
I'm talking mostly in regards to the Champions League.This is 100% correct. As someone who has watched most of City’s games, the change in consistency and control of games since Pep deployed the full back playing in a box midfield has been very noticeable. Game changing in fact. Teams can’t even lay a glove on them when they are on it.
City are about to win the league for the 5th time in 6 years. Teams being in better form previously has made no difference.
Yeah, pretty funny to read the argument that thanks to Haaland attracting defenders, other player can score when City has been relying on pretty much any player in their team scoring for years now.They also put 4 past Real last season but conceded 3. That is the difference not Haaland.
They scored 99 goals in the league last season without a striker, have 92 so far this season with 3 games to go. Not much of a difference from last season.
In terms of showcasing tricks/skills he is definitely more of Neymar rather than Mbappe during his earlier days, but in terms of attacking on the break on counter he is somewhat similar to Mbappe, but afterall it’s likely that Mbappe did model his game based on his idol’s style.Ronaldo 03 to 06 was similar to Neymar only interms of trying ball skills (obviously not as good) but he was not a playmaker.
Ronaldo 06 to 09 wasn't similar at all to Neymar. Neymar is more of a number 10 with excellent dribbling ability.
He was similar to Mbappe interms of style 06-14 (vertical, running into space, getting at the end of chances). He was much better at heading and freekicks, Mbappe is more explosive and has better close control. Mbappe plays for a circus team though. If he wants to become successful, he needs to leave.
Yes, he wreaks havoc and terrorises defenses with his presence, movement and relentlessness, making it much easier for everyone else in his team. Also, without several world class saves by the best keeper in the world, and the woodwork, he could very well have scored 2 or 3 last night.He causes pure chaos even if he doesn't score and they would not be in the CL final or top of the PL without him.
Maybe, maybe not, City had some of their best performances of the season with Alvarez on the pitch.He causes pure chaos even if he doesn't score and they would not be in the CL final or top of the PL without him.
If we had signed him I think he could have gotten between 25-30 goals in the league goals but the reality is we wouldn't create anywhere near as many chances as City but we also would have rested him a lot less so he would have had much more game time.Premier League player of the season. Goal scoring record broken.
I'll always wonder if he could have had a similar or even better season had we managed to sign him. Or would we curse the Bundesliga for being too soft a league to transition from again. Whatever the case that's got to be the most impressive Premier League debut season that I can ever recall.
Cl finals mean everything here. But even if he doesnt score, he will had broken ancient records in the pl, will finish CL topscorer. Any other year Messi would win because of the oscars effect of the WC, but this year im certain it will be Haaland. Messi as such hasnt been overlooked so its not like he's owed a ballon d'or.Debate over. Messi will win the Ballon D'Or and he deserves it. It has been other players that have stepped forward at the business end of the season for City, not Haaland.
Messi is still the favourite in the betting odds despite everything you've said because the bookmakers know that the World Cup reigns supreme and always has.Cl finals mean everything here. But even if he doesnt score, he will had broken ancient records in the pl, will finish CL topscorer. Any other year Messi would win because of the oscars effect of the WC, but this year im certain it will be Haaland. Messi as such hasnt been overlooked so its not like he's owed a ballon d'or.
It's beginning to look like as much of a team effort as the United treble. Haaland has been conspicuous by his absence in many of the late season's biggest games but Gundogan, Silva etc. have stepped upHaaland is a great striker, but he plays in a great team, so he can have his off-days and they will win anyway, he didn't do anything of note in the two UCL fixtures against us either.
All it takes is for Haaland to score a goal against a mediocre Inter side in the final. Anyway we will see. I think see this Ballon d'or will be exception when it comes to the heavy wc bias. Im a Messi fan, i think it would be nice to see him retire on a duper high with a 8th Ballon d'or but atm i dont see it. The bookies shift all the time anyway.Messi is still the favourite in the betting odds despite everything you've said because the bookmakers know that the World Cup reigns supreme and always has.
Messi will win it. WC and WC golden ball > a club treble for any footballer (if they had the choice). Haaland hasn't helped himself by disappearing in the last few weeks but I guess the CL final is still there for him to do something.All it takes is for Haaland to score a goal against a mediocre Inter side in the final. Anyway we will see. I think see this Ballon d'or will be exception when it comes to the heavy wc bias. Im a Messi fan, i think it would be nice to see him retire on a duper high with a 8th Ballon d'or but atm i dont see it. The bookies shift all the time anyway.
Have people not told them nobody poaches their players for some mysterious reason?Article this morning saying there's fear at City that if they win the treble, Haaland will want to go to Madrid as he'll have won everything at City. One can hope.
Haha yeah right... It is his first season, bumper contract, I wonder how much he would cost. Looks like he stays there for a whileArticle this morning saying there's fear at City that if they win the treble, Haaland will want to go to Madrid as he'll have won everything at City. One can hope.