What? France, Portugal, and Italy were all on the same side of the draw. Of course, only one was going to make it.
England have a squad at least equivalent to theirs, anyway. This downplaying of the England squad to make it seem 'over achieving' is a joke.
We have the deepest attack in the tournament.
This is what is most frustrating. Because we have Southgate as a coach, we'll likely never know the full potential of utilising our attacking talent. Sterling and Kane were never subbed (apart from maybe in an early group game?), despite at multiple times being utter dross and clearly being the weak links in our squad. And then the rest of the starting XI is made up of defenders.
Honestly every England fan giving it the big one about how Southgate was tactically "astute" vs the Germans or the Danish (which is truly ridiculous) would be fuming if their club consistently lined up with 7/8 defenders in practically every single game - whether against Scotland or Germany - knowing that they have world class attackers on the bench. No other nation benches their most creative players.
Ukraine was the only match where we actually had attacking flair on the pitch. Ukraine, i.e. the shittest (with respect) team we could possibly have face in the QFs. We should have lined up in a similar fashion against Denmark, who were clearly knackered having no where near the strength in depth and having gone to Baku and back.
The man is truly a coward. There's no match after a final, you might as well set up to go for the jugular. Started brightly and we should have pressed home our advantage in that first half. Instead no, sit back, let Italy grow into the game and then not react when Mancini makes smart subs to counter England's first half advantage.
Honestly fuming, can't wait for club football to start again so I'm not cheering the same team as Spurs/West Ham/Millwall/generic London club fan anymore. Glad Sancho and Rashford missed, hopefully the guaranteed booing they'll get will spur them on for a Ronaldo 08 esque season.