Wolves did not outplay us the last time we played them. They managed a 1-1 draw on their own ground which involved United missing a penalty and several other good chances, while Wolves barely managed a meaningful attack.
It has nothing to do with anything, but you are deliberately making up complete and utter lies in order to slag your own manager off. You're either a wind up or a complete idiot.
If you want to be critical try sticking to either facts or opinion, rather than pure inventionism. Otherwise you might as well just start pretending we don't win when we do
Not getting Derby promoted doesn't eclipse anyone else's achievement, because it isn't an achievement. Derby were perfectly capable of missing out on promotion before Lampard arrived. It's no more an achievement than Ole nearly managing to drag a dead in the water United team to 4th place, actually. If anything the later was more impressive. Derby were a consistent playoff contender before Lampard was manager. United were on course to finish about 9th when Ole took over.
Mourinho got slaughtered by people for not being entertaining enough, except this started out when we were winning 4-0 nearly every other week, so was another bizarre argument. He also abandoned counter attack tactics for bringing on tall players and sitting hopefully on narrow leads while punting the ball aimlessly up the pitch. Something I am yet to see under Ole, and also know that I wont see, because it is very easy to see what Ole's tactics and directives are if you aren't just pretending not to see them to support a stupid argument.
The last paragraph applies exactly the same to Lampard and could even apply to an actual proven manager like Pochettino, who will not mount a title challenge this year despite investing heavily in a squad he's shaped over 4 years now. If you want to hold Ole to the same standards as you would anyone else, that's fine, but it isn't what you are doing. You are holding him to a completely different standard to other managers and then using that as a stick to beat him with. You are not going to give him a chance, which is a strange position to take since he has already been appointed as manager.
Well actually this is quite funny because I watch and sometimes go to both Chelsea and Derby games due to my dad being a Chelsea fan, and most of my family living in Derby, and actually, they do not play the exact same way at all. Lampard's Chelsea tend to come flying out of the blocks and hope to give themselves enough of a lead to sit on before they run out of puff. Derby did not do this at all. Their passing style was very different. They were more progressive, and frankly a lot of the time, not actually very good and a bit clueless looking. The best I saw them play under Lampard was against United. Mount orchestrated the midfield for them. For Chelsea, Jorginho does this. From the differences in how each team plays my guess would be Lampard leaves the tactical side somewhat to his other coaches and the players he has at his disposal, and how they were coached by the previous manager, which I would argue isn't that stupid of him while he's finding his feet...but basically you're talking complete bollocks. You are just making stuff up.
Just to clarify, Ole took a more difficult job than Lampard last season in more difficult circumstances and, at worst, made a comparably impressive fist of it. This season Chelsea sit below United, having lost 4-0, to United. They failed to beat the worst team in the league in their last home game. They were played off the park by and failed to beat the same team United beat in a largely untroubled manner just yesterday. Some of their football is nice to watch, but they were coached last season by a manager who DOES know how to coach attacking movement. United were coached by Mourinho, who pretty much gave up on even attacking at all. I actually like Lampard, in the long term he might do well...but there is no grounds to claim you know he is a better coach than Solksjaer. It is like me telling you I know Greenwood will turn out to be a better player than Hudson-Odoi...there is nowhere near enough to go on to make any kiond of intelligent conclusion, and only way I can make an argument for it is by making up some complete bullshit and hoping it comes true.
I'm not sure what you're here for other than to make dishonest arguments and then accuse other people of doing the same thing. I mean there are perfectly understandable reasons to have reservations about whether Ole can be succesful at United...you've abandoned them in favour of aggressive line nonsense arguments.
