- Jul 4, 2014
THe fact that some are targeting ole for playing a player who was accused of rape goes to show how deep seated their bias is against him. They either have no notion of the concept of being innocent until proven guilty or are aware of it and are willfully ignoring it as it doesn’t serve their purpose here. I would say ole would have been remiss in his duty to the club of not choosing his best team in the basis of an accusation which haven’t been proven true even after he left his job.Solskjær isn't a lawyer, nor qualified to make moral judgments on an open legal case he has no idea about, and he was employed by a club whose CEO made a public statement stating the player would be "relevant for the team going forward".
Some of you have utterly unrealistic expectations for football managers and seriously overrate the power they hold.