Ole Gunnar Solskjaer | W15 D2 L4

Is Ole a good appointment?


  • Total voters
    2,659

Jagga7

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2011
Messages
7,081
Location
in a cave
Great post match interview from him, he was honest and was optimistic. Would love him to be the permanent manager.
 

Relevated

fixated with venom and phalluses
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
25,995
Location
18M1955/JU5
This was his first big test. The first one where a major trophy was at stake. Where does this leave OGS?
With an impeccable league performance from a squad that is full of a few has-beens and lazy, overweight, footballers.

Champions league wise we don't have the most talented squad, and that was evident from the start and as he said a moment ago in his post match intetview, there are mountains to climb on this journey but mountains are there to be climbed.

I just don't know who United would be able to replace a few of the current players with.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
We lost from poor defending at a corner and 1 poor defensive mistake. It happens.

We looked knackered and could never muster up the energy to really press them and win the ball back. Mbappes pace killed that for us also, we looked scared to push up.

Unfortunately our attack was limited to crosses and most of those were poor.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
Lukaku should have come in for Lingard. Both are shite options, but I'd take Lukaku over Mata at right wing.
Even at the end Lukaku should have come in for Sanchez rather than Rashford.
Well quite. They're both shite options which say more about our lack of depth than they do about Ole. I don't believe for a second though that Lukaku would have done much else than bumble around aimlessly and give the ball away a lot. That's been his MO for a while now and it's difficult to see how that might have changed tonight.

Ole picked the harder working player who was most likely to be able to join in with keeping the ball and knitting together our attacks. If it was a mistake it was one made for the right reasons at least.
 

Shaw Mee Tah Mané

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 4, 2019
Messages
160
Keeping Rashford as the striker should have resulted in a red for Kimpembe in 46th minute, I’d like to see the subs criticized if that happened. Margins.

That said, Sanchez is just terrible. Not a threat at all, and the way he just randomly left his positioning before the Mbappe header is almost funny.
 

fergies coat

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
2,806
Location
Wythenshawe, Manchester
He’s has given us a style of play in the space of a few weeks, something Mourinho couldn’t do in three years.

He’s come in and done better then anyone could imagine, and the fact people believed we had a chance against PSG, when just a few months ago everyone was dreading this game, is a credit to what Ole has done.

Everyone was buzzing before this game thinking we had a chance, and that’s down to Ole and Mike Phelan. Now he loses his first game and now almost everyone is saying he’s not good enough. It’s shameful it really is.
 

littlepeasoup

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
5,349
Location
Give peas a chance.
The arguments that Ole was 'tactically outclassed' tonight are, frankly, absurd. The set up was fine, but he was fecked by an unfortunate double injury at half time and PSG took advantage before we'd got to grips with the change. The two options he bought on were, of course, not suited to doing what Lingard (in particular) had done, but he had no other options.

There's simply a gulf in quality between the two sides (even when PSG have two of their key players out injured) and they won the game because of a defensive mistake by us and a moment of quality. Both of those are areas we know we need to improve.
Very much my opinion as well. Those two changes killed us; up until that point I feel like both sides were fairly well matched.
 

Cardboard elk

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Messages
697
Supports
Rosenborg
I do not understand how anyone can blame Ole for the loss today.

1. PSG are a better team, United need to spend time and money and re-build. This is not yet Oles team, and this is his first loss in two months. No one could have done any better. I just don't see how.

2. Ref messed up the match, took the flow out of uniteds play imo. Also should have given second yellow to Kimpembe and not Pogba. Nani should have been given the yellow earlier. Pro-Psg ref.

3. Players were nervous and it got worse because of the ref. Maybe also kind of "that day" performance wise.

4. Then the injuries of Martial and Lingard. Blaming Ole for the subs is ridicoulous. Who should he have put on that could have saved the day? This is a team sport and you would need at least one Messi to turn this shit around.

5. Not much else to work with on the bench. Maybe Lukaku, but he has been poor lately imo.

6. Unprecise deliveries/passes. That is not a tactical choice either.

I sincerely think that long term development and continuity pays off. If Ole gets the job, I am truly convinced United will get better ad better, as long as good enough players are bought.
World class CB, RB, RW is a good start, along with letting Ole have a pre-season and getting the players in shape for high-press play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KM

The Hacker

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
534
Blimey! Some of the reaction tonight is unexpected.

A few factors caused today’s loss, but for me, OGS wasn’t one of them. We have a weak squad with expensive players that either aren’t that good or are in shocking form

We played a team used to playing in that way, with high quality almost everywhere you look

We were asleep for their first goal, not much OGS could have done about that.

The 2 injuries meant we had to rely on the weak bench

We have lost to worse teams before, and we will do again. What tonight was, was a reality check of the relatively poor transfer business we have conducted over the last few years. We have no real strength in depth. We have no like for like options to keep the momentum going. If we are hit with an injury we don’t just swap players, we need to swap formation and tactics.

It was frustrating to watch. I hope the board realise we need a proper strategy going forward re transfers as no matter who was in the box seat tonight, they would have still had the same players to choose from.
 

Bola

New Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2018
Messages
1,205
I haven't read through the comments yet but I'd be baffled by any criticism of his selection, subs, tactics or whatever.

We were just not good enough.
Mata at RW?

Was OGS expecting something different from the last 20+ times he has played there and done feck all?

I'm not putting tonight's loss on OGS, it was mainly a combination of bad luck*, a very good PSG 2nd half and the disruption of injuries. However, the 4th factor was a bad sub by OGS, it did nothing to enhance the team and he should have known better**

Stepping back from the game, OGS needs to be looking at his squad. He can't do anything about buying players currently, but the academy can effectively be a new signing. If he puts his money where his mouth is with youth, he could have had other attacking options for when Plan A dies not work, or you come across injury misfortune

I'm still happy giving OGS the job, but if he does the 'definition of insanity' thing another time with Mata, then I'm going to seriously question his credentials. Such decision making is not going to deliver sustained trophies

*Kimpbape Not being sent off twice then scoring

** Lukaku has done ok on the right
 

Josh 76

Full Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
5,598
Very much my opinion as well. Those two changes killed us; up until that point I feel like both sides were fairly well matched.
I agree to a certain extent. Just wanted him to change the formation when he knew he couldnt replace the pace of Lingard and Martial
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,326
Location
Lucilinburhuc
Motivation can only get you as far, tactically completely outsmarted. It wasnt a surprise how PSG set up, and we still got outclassed. Hope he learns from it, because City and Pool wont be easier.
 

Kevin_

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
546
Location
Sydney
All in for Poch with these resources, glad people like you are not in charge of the club. Two completely different jobs and two different managers. Yes Ole got the subs wrong and you think you want to go all out for Poch is beyond daft.

Essentially this.

Not good enough for the top levels - yet.

The united board should be ALL IN for Pochettino, who with these resources would excel I think.
 

Bola

New Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2018
Messages
1,205
Blimey! Some of the reaction tonight is unexpected.

A few factors caused today’s loss, but for me, OGS wasn’t one of them. We have a weak squad with expensive players that either aren’t that good or are in shocking form

We played a team used to playing in that way, with high quality almost everywhere you look

We were asleep for their first goal, not much OGS could have done about that.

The 2 injuries meant we had to rely on the weak bench

We have lost to worse teams before, and we will do again. What tonight was, was a reality check of the relatively poor transfer business we have conducted over the last few years. We have no real strength in depth. We have no like for like options to keep the momentum going. If we are hit with an injury we don’t just swap players, we need to swap formation and tactics.

It was frustrating to watch. I hope the board realise we need a proper strategy going forward re transfers as no matter who was in the box seat tonight, they would have still had the same players to choose from.
A free with most of the post, but part of the weak bench issue down to OGS though. He keeps giving underperformers a chance and despite the non-existent performances of Mata on the right, he is the guaranteed to be the Plan B.

If he puts little more faith in youth, he's have more options.

Wpuld probably not have mattered tonight (pun intended), but it's a 'marginal gain' being ignored and it will cost us
 

reddaz71

New Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
960
Location
Cheshire
He's doing fine but his hands are tied by the men in suits, sooner or later if he gets the job, which is likely, he will become frustrated!
 

ArjenIsM3

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
5,645
Location
Netherlands
Mata at RW?

Was OGS expecting something different from the last 20+ times he has played there and done feck all?

I'm not putting tonight's loss on OGS, it was mainly a combination of bad luck*, a very good PSG 2nd half and the disruption of injuries. However, the 4th factor was a bad sub by OGS, it did nothing to enhance the team and he should have known better**

Stepping back from the game, OGS needs to be looking at his squad. He can't do anything about buying players currently, but the academy can effectively be a new signing. If he puts his money where his mouth is with youth, he could have had other attacking options for when Plan A dies not work, or you come across injury misfortune

I'm still happy giving OGS the job, but if he does the 'definition of insanity' thing another time with Mata, then I'm going to seriously question his credentials. Such decision making is not going to deliver sustained trophies

*Kimpbape Not being sent off twice then scoring

** Lukaku has done ok on the right
Mate are you actually saying OGS should have gone with Chong instead of Mata in the CL against PSG when he hasn't even proved himself at PL level yet? I agree Lukaku should have been brought on instead of Mata though.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,100
Losing tonight doesn't make him a bad manager. But our recent run of results against moderate opposition doesn't make him a great manager either.

He's done brilliantly since he came back but let's be honest, he couldn't have had a more favourable run of fixtures. Had Spurs taken their chances at Wembley we'd be saying he'd flunked his only two real tests.

He's certainly got a massive challenge now to lift the players and get through the next few games against tough opponents. If he can do that, he'll deserve the job. But hopefully people will relax and stop clamouring for him to be given the job immediately.
 

Acquire Me

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2006
Messages
8,419
Location
Norway
Mate are you actually saying OGS should have gone with Chong instead of Mata in the CL against PSG when he hasn't even proved himself at PL level yet? I agree Lukaku should have been brought on instead of Mata though.
I dont think Lukaku for Mata would have made a difference.
 

deafepl

New Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,974
Now the members of Redcafe are understanding my assessment of Ole. I saw this coming and if some of our fans actually watch games rather than score line, they would have notice this as well when we played Pochettino Spurs.

Ole has now been tactical outsmarted by Tuchel and Pochettino. Tuchel were playing without two of their best attacker and we barely troubled Buffon.

Many fans jumped the bandwagon, but I stated that it is good to wait and see. Ole has done well to dominate the smaller team, but he has not passed Amadaeus test on showing such dominance against a top team. It will be an uphill battle next leg without Pogba, but if Ole can come through that, then he will definitely earn a lot of praise.

It is unfortunate now. I really wanted us to go through as we would not look so desparate when we try and go after Pochettino. Regardless, if Ole doesn’t go through, the season is still long and he still has a chance to be my number 1 choice.

Not sure about Poch, only Poch have been better than Ole for 20 minutes when our defence just collapsed and De Gea had to make saves.

Difference between United and PSG in possession, they are better drilled in possession when playing higher, they play out from back in our half, we don't, that's a problem.
I think Ole has not outclassed by Tuchel until half time we get two hit injury but his management of sub is questionable where we look so slow with Mata and Sanchez, we need more pace in attack, a fullback is average, it cost us game, I don't think PSG has outclassed us, they have created three chance, one of them come from corner, that's it, we only created one chance.

I'd like to give Ole more time considering he only got a job in half and month ago, not enough time for us to adapt to his style of play. We need a new fullback especially RB which I believe could have made huge difference to our play
 

#07

makes new threads with tweets in the OP
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
23,363
The media hounds will be so desperate to see the fans turn on Ole. Nothing they like more than building someone up to tear them down.

For me, Ole's still the man. As I've said elsewhere he had two subs ripped away from him by enforced changes, which cost us two of our best attackers. I didn't think Mata on the right was the right call, I reckon Lukaku would've given them more to think about like he did Arsenal, but I'm not blaming Ole for what happened tonight.

We came up against a team that, on the day, was better prepared for it. Like Ole said our lack of experience at this level got shown up. Nerves hurt us. However, in the second leg we have nothing to lose so hopefully we'll just go out there and play with freedom.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,169
I do think our performances have been trending down a bit.

And our ball circulation(which looked good the first few games), has also gotten worse along the way.

We shouldn't rush into a decision.

I want to see how Ole responds after this loss.
 

Bola

New Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2018
Messages
1,205
Mate are you actually saying OGS should have gone with Chong instead of Mata in the CL against PSG when he hasn't even proved himself at PL level yet? I agree Lukaku should have been brought on instead of Mata though.
No.

I'm.saying he should have used Gomes, Greenwood or Chong more in previous games (and certainly going forward), so they could have been in contention as a bench option tonight instead of the same old underwhelming 'plan b'

Mata was pants in the Newcastle game, poor v Burnley (until moved central at the end) and non existent v Fulham. Ignoring all his previous failures in that position prior to OGS taking over, I'm unclear why he got picked in both those latter games when it was an opportunity to give others a chance

I'm not claiming that cost us tonight, but he again did nothing and is the opposite of a 'marginal gain' when subbed/ rotated there
 

Edgar Allan Pillow

Ero-Sennin
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
41,453
Location
┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬
Well quite. They're both shite options which say more about our lack of depth than they do about Ole. I don't believe for a second though that Lukaku would have done much else than bumble around aimlessly and give the ball away a lot. That's been his MO for a while now and it's difficult to see how that might have changed tonight.

Ole picked the harder working player who was most likely to be able to join in with keeping the ball and knitting together our attacks. If it was a mistake it was one made for the right reasons at least.
Let's be honest. After them scoring, most of our plays went through right flank of Young/Herrera when we have Pogba on the left. Shaw was nowhere to be seen. It stands to reason that we got our tactics wrong when our game doesn't flow through our best player. I didn't see Pogba being marked that closely that we had to bypass him.

Yes, depth and quality were the main culprits but we really should have ground out a 0-0 at minimum.
 

ArjenIsM3

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
5,645
Location
Netherlands
I dont think Lukaku for Mata would have made a difference.
Why not? He's more direct, has more pace, would have brought a physical threat. Mata brought nothing whatsoever to the table. No speed, no goal threat, no physicality. Just neat (and sideways) passing
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,192
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
I am just surprised he didn't start Jones, even though I am not his biggest fan. Otherwise, I cannot really blame him too much today, and especially judge him. If anything, I was surprised in the first 20 minutes that we looked so good, but it was inevitable it won't last with so many players having terrible performances.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
He’s being judged game to game as if he’s a player. It’s very bizarre. As if every performance is a direct result of his actions, irrespective of result or context.

Well, this isn’t how it works. You make judgements based on a body of work over time. Like we judged Mourinho and Van Gaal for the worse. Or Ferguson for the better. We didn’t watch Ferguson’s team lose to a clearly superior Milan side and pick apart his minute-by-minute management of the team. We accepted the loss as a normal element of football; part and parcel of a season in which football matches are lost.

Some folk are even criticising his team talk. Talking about his Tuchel ‘done him over’ going into the second half. Like, where and when did this happen? And how?

It’s going to be a tedious end to the season if every match is going to be viewed in isolation like this. Bloody hell.
 

Rish Sawhney

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 15, 2015
Messages
619
Location
State College
I agree. The team obviously need investment but I don't think it's the right time to go with/gamble on Ole.
:lol:"gamble on Ole". Ole is much less of a gamble than say Poch. Imagine if Poch comes in and we're 5th in October? There'd be mass riots and for good reason. Not hiring a manager thats doing well is way more of a gamble.

We've never been traditionally strong in Europe. Sure if we beat PsG its great, but Man united managers should be judged on league performances.
 

littlepeasoup

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
5,349
Location
Give peas a chance.
He’s being judged game to game as if he’s a player. It’s very bizarre. As if every performance is a direct result of his actions, irrespective of result or context.

Well, this isn’t how it works. You make judgements based on a body of work over time. Like we judged Mourinho and Van Gaal for the worse. Or Ferguson for the better. We didn’t watch Ferguson’s team lose to a clearly superior Milan side and pick apart his minute-by-minute management of the team. We accepted the loss as a normal element of football; part and parcel of a season in which football matches are lost.

Some folk are even criticising his team talk. Talking about his Tuchel ‘done him over’ going into the second half. Like, where and when did this happen? And how?

It’s going to be a tedious end to the season if every match is going to be viewed in isolation like this. Bloody hell.
I feel like every poster on here should be made to read this. You're far too sensible, and we don't deserve you.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,011
I'm a bit torn because I think we started really well and Tuchel had to switch things around pretty quickly - we were solid first half although we created nothing. Initially I was screaming at the tv when I saw Mata coming on but we just don't really have anyone else and from there we just fell apart.

I was hoping he'd change formation and maybe even go to a three at the back to avoid bringing Mata on (who is redundant on the RW) and go 5-3-2.
 

Njord

Full Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2017
Messages
431
Can't believe people are criticising his subs today. He's given chances to just about every player that didn't start today, and apart from CB's every single one of them have been a significant downgrade from the one that's starting. Who do people want him to throw on? Greenwood?
 
Last edited:

Thiim

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 9, 2012
Messages
1,264
Location
Offside (by the length of a toe)
I think there's a real chance that fortunes might be changing. The injuries and subpar quality of the bench and the fixture list is very damning. Will deserve huge praise if he keeps us in the FA cup and in the top 4 over the coming weeks.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,293
Stand by what I said previously, I don't understand Ole's substitutions at times and also I think he's slow to respond. I don't know what his ceiling is but I believe Poch's will be higher.
 

Member 93275

Guest
Despite Ferguson's reputation of a manager playing Gung-ho football, much of the noughties he explored looking for an answer in Europe, hiring the likes of Queiroz and trying stuff like playing with a single forward. What worked in the PL, was no longer working in Europe, and he was working on that. And the PL was developing tactically too. In other words, Ferguson was always developing. This is something Ole must still do. He's got the classic United style covered, but it needs to develop into a more modern context to truly succeed.
 

bondsname

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
1,075
We have a starting eleven that works just fine, but if just one starter is unavailable we are in big trouble.

That is the squad he inherited, not much Ole can do about that. He should however be able to make the game tighter tactically.

I know we are all sick and tired of defensive football but there's no shame going to the defensive route if you have no better options. Mata and Sanchez subs are just plain stupid subs.

Lucky for us we have a young squad and a young manager, both who can learn from their mistakes and improve. Let's see how Ole handles the next coming games.