Zoo
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2010
- Messages
- 29,817
The players were kept in for 2 hours after the game. They were kept in for 90 minutes after the Leicester game. WTF is going on? Clearly it’s not working whatever it is.
It was like 3-1 to City in the 89th minute and we’d recently just scored. Fergie tried to go all balls out to get the draw but it backfired hence why they scored 3 goals in 90 minute stoppage time.How about when we lost 6-1 to City?
The post implied that context wasn’t importantWas it 4-0 at half-time and a continuation of inconsistent performances for the previous 3 years?
That was a much closer game.How about when we lost 6-1 to City?
Seen this equivocation a lot in the past 24 hours. . . Do better.How about when we lost 6-1 to City?
Luckhurst from what I recall has typically been a reliable journalist for information. Clearly there are a few in the media who have close sources with the club. The fact the glazers haven't said anything is evidence enough.I don't buy a lot of this press clickbait shit. Anyone could write this stuff. Sources, people close to etc... It's all just media pressure and expectancy after a poor run of results.
Pretty sure they have to inform the stock markets of any decision early because it might affect the share price. When that happens, we'll know.
They were probably discussing who has to post the apology on social media.The players were kept in for 2 hours after the game. They were kept in for 90 minutes after the Leicester game. WTF is going on? Clearly it’s not working whatever it is.
They didn't want us to sack OGS.I'm shocked Liverpool did.
It’s over. The club haven’t denied it. If he was staying it would have been denied hours ago.Lot of tweets now saying he's gone, nothing substantiated though. Probably just people riding the clickbait waves
Im not trying to equate the two, just pointing out that context is important and that a 5 goal loss isn’t an automatic sacking.Seen this equivocation a lot in the past 24 hours. . . Do better.
You'd have sacked SAF after the 6-1 loss? The same loss were we had 10 men at 3-1 and threw players forward and died on our sword?How about when we lost 6-1 to City?
Agreed. I think if this story is true the main holdup would be lining up a new manager.Getting rid of OGS won't achieve anything unless we have someone ready to take over and a decent calibre someone otherwise Carrick and Mckenna will continue the same stuff...
Yup.Agreed. I think if this story is true the main holdup would be lining up a new manager.
Luckhurst gets a lot right. He was all over Varane before anyone else and he's not the only reporting this. Jamie Jackson has also said that Richard Arnold has cancelled all appointments to hold talks with Joel Glazer. It's clearly under consideration.MEN don't know Jack at the best of times, so I'll take this for what it is...Luckhurst spouting his thoughts.
Just don't see how the Glazers or their stooge Woodward have the foresight to make a decision which should've been made last year!
I don't think we will hear anything concrete from club for a few weeks yet, if they are sensible they will hedge their bets and speak with other managers and understand their options before making a decision.Agreed. I think if this story is true the main holdup would be lining up a new manager.
That would have been brilliant by them and they could've helped our club by extending the score line, but in reality they dialed back a bit to safely see the game out and not let it get out of hand. To them it's just 3 points all the same on the way to the title.They didn't want us to sack OGS.
How much credit ie trophies did Ferguson have in his account when that happened… completely different scenario.How about when we lost 6-1 to City?
More miss than hit. A big Jose fanboy he is and hasn't got over his departure from United yet. MEN are full of clickbait chatter.How reliable is Luckhurst ?
MEN seem to tweet an awful lot of sh**e during the transfer windows
Always remember - Jurgen Klopp would be managing us if Ed Woodward wasn’t a bellend.They're probably trying to persuade Conte to sign up to Disneyland and he adds a zero every time Ed opens his mouth.
Think it’s going to be either Conte or Zidane. Basically someone that is available right now.I am very worried about who replaces him. We have to get it right.
Somethings not right hereI am very worried about who replaces him. We have to get it right.
How is this even remotely relevant?Joined in '06 but have only made 2244 messages, do you only post when a manager gets hired and fired?
I have a really bad feeling we won't get it rightI am very worried about who replaces him. We have to get it right.
Luckhurst was on the ball with our transfer activity and first to call out our interest in Varane. He and Ogden are the only ones at the moment who seem to hold our club to high standards, the rest like Gary are absolute jokes.MEN don't know Jack at the best of times, so I'll take this for what it is...Luckhurst spouting his thoughts.
Just don't see how the Glazers or their stooge Woodward have the foresight to make a decision which should've been made last year!
All we're seeing in the media is Conte at the minute. Luckhurst, Jamie Jackson. Romano, Hirst etc all have mentioned him. Hirst has just said that Conte has reservations though.I am very worried about who replaces him. We have to get it right.
Klopp to Ole - “great job keeping a clean sheet for 30 minutes with 10 men!”They didn't want us to sack OGS.