Our midfield seems to be a perennial problem

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,414
It’s been said a million times but a lot of the problems fall back on the keeper. The midfield are chasing the game for 90 minutes because we time and time again keep hoofing the ball upfront giving away possession.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,413
Ideally you want Caicedo and Rice so we have Casemiro, Caicedo and Rice as options in the middle.

If you want to play a 6 and two 8s, then you can play Casemiro, Rice and Bruno.

If you want to play a more 4231 system, then you can play Casemiro, Rice or Caicedo and Bruno at the 10.

But we need three quality options in CM.
Would have made sense if we had signed Caicedo when Brighton did, but I don’t see any way we can get to that kind of spend. Seems like Mount is going to be one of the 8s next year so that leaves us needing a Casemiro back up.

I think it’ll be a cheap back up, Rabiot-type signing.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,100
Simply signing a “world class” midfielder will not remedy the multi-dimensional and long-standing issues we face, I'm afraid. Sure, some of the concerns will be alleviated with the injection of markedly better quality, but many others will remain if we do not have a coherent framework in mind. What even is a world class midfielder, and will this particular individual really address the crux of the problem, regardless of profile? We have signed players (not just midfielders) who were considered world class, or close to it, by lots of observers, but most of them did not pan out for various footballing and non-footballing reasons: Mata, Di María, Pogba, Sánchez, Sancho and so forth. Now, we should definitely not give up on signing top, top players and things could (and probably will) be different under ten Hag (vis-à-vis Moyes, van Gaal, Mourinho and Solskjær), but our recent history (as regards improper, neverending and ridiculously expensive midfield retooling) points to suboptimal analyses, prioritization and recruitment, and perhaps the club needs to take a step back, revisit the principles that have led us astray and consider the broader picture?

Before we try to move forward and make massive investments, we need to figure out what we really need from the midfield department in exceedingly specific terms (and with regard to challenging Manchester City on a consistent basis on all fronts, because they are not going away for the foreseeable future and will continue to set the benchmark, as the team to beat in English football). At least try to build a technically accomplished, dynamic, press-resistant and tactically astute collective that can play on the front foot against the best teams (with qualities that complement each other to engineer a whole which is greater than sum of parts). Suggestions of us piling up on a myriad workhorses and tenacious role players are gob-smacking; this is Manchester United, working hard and putting in a tactical shift is fine but in many ways the absolute minimum in terms of requirements, and we should seek to dazzle and dominate the heart of the pitch as well as the crucial half-spaces (particularly on the ball), not give up and resort to reactive football to contain our superiors (while attempting to strike back during transitions).

Acquiring as many evasive, quick-thinking, courageous and purposeful ball-carriers as possible (who can also retain possession in condensed zones), for every department, is very much the need of the hour — that releases pressure, creates pockets of space, makes the opposition work harder (especially if you vary your approach with routine pass-and-move combinations), and so on and so forth. There are times when out-of-his-diapers Alejandro Garnacho is our only credible ball-carrying threat on the pitch (which makes it easier for the opposition to contain us). Like, what gives, who are our reliably strong and technically superb dribblers? Looking at some of the playmaking ball-carriers at Manchester City (Grealish, Silva, Foden) or even Arsenal (Ødegaard, Saka, Martinelli), we don't measure up (and that needs fixing). Not even thinking about someone who can control the game, at this moment — players who can do that are rare (we should be deliberate and methodical with our move, in the contemporary game you need someone who can pass well on all three levels and also effortlessly bypass rigorous pressing with deft maneuvers), and we also need to sort out other midfield-related issues first (as long as the appropriate groundwork is not laid, even an accomplished architect will be stifled and start underperforming).
Great post
 

AndyMUFC

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
1,964
I mean we went from McFred to Casemiro and Eriksen so that was a big upgrade in one year. We need another upgrade to compete for the league 100%, but we have made progress on that front.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
Some of you are going to need to accept that Ten Hag isn’t going to make this team possession-oriented like City. It doesn’t need to be this way either.

That’s not to say we shouldn’t bring in players who can get on the ball calmly, but there’s ways to a top notch football team without necessarily bringing in Frenkie De Jong.

A better goalkeeper and more comfortable defenders in possession down our right side would complement the midfielders we have. I’m not massive on Mason Mount at all, but I’m willing to trust Ten Hag on this one.

We have two of the world’s best players in transition in Bruno and Rashford. Add a striker to that and get more out of Antony and Garnacho and we’re perfectly capable of being a really good team, even without that metronome people understandably want to see at the club.
 

Red Devil 26

Premature Examination
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
3,334
Location
Sydenham
As an outsider. The difference in possession between City and United was daylight. United only looked threatening with a quick release & if the attack was players rushing to goal. If City got back and forced United to consolidate possession you looked lost, aimlessly knocking passes around before someone whipped in a cross from the flanks. Also the fact DDG was knocking it long is a big red flag against his name. He cant play with his feet so has been given an instruction to go long to avoid a costly turnover - basically accommodating his limitations. I would be stunned if ETH has him as your number 1 next season. His long kicks were also rubbish, little chips and knocking it to the halfway line as if it were a strategic long pass. It would have been better if your backline pushed up to the halfway line and DDG just went as long as he can, he should be able to kick the ball three lengths of the field, contest the ball in the air and try to win the second ball in the City half.

Ill tell you another thing, Bruno and Casemiro are not possession players. Bruno is excellent on the break going forward, but being able to retain and recycle possession its not natural to him, likewise Casemiro. Yet these are your two best midfielders. Rashford is another who is lethal on the break, but in tight spaces his lethality dries up. All your best players are geared toward counter attacking, and if you get Harry Kane you would have 4 players totally built for the counter. But is this the brand ETH want to play? Still not sure what the end game is with ETH and what he sees as the end product he is trying to establish.
Agree with this wholeheartedly. Players considered our best will force us to play a certain way, which, IMO, is not conducive to getting us back to the top.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,956
I agree with the main concensus on here, especially the fact we buy 'WC or very good players' on big wages and out outlay on transfer fees, then they dont perform for us as we want them to. That is because they have usually had the same standard of player playing with them at their previous club. Would De Bruyne have performed here at the same level he has for City, for example? We need to start from the basics and scout the Caicedo's when they will cost a lot less than 70/80 mill or more. This way our transfer budget stretches more, then the WC player signing will stand out as a WC player. Until we learn this lesson, buying the likes of a 80 mill or more player is just going to get lost in the same scenario and we will still get turned over by the Brentfords, Brightons as well as the big boys.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
Agree with this wholeheartedly. Players considered our best will force us to play a certain way, which, IMO, is not conducive to getting us back to the top.
Liverpool were the best team in the world for a period and had the likes of Milner and Henderson in midfield. Fabinho and Wijnaldum weren’t metronomes either.

I understand where people are coming from, but there’s different ways to skin a cat.

The likes of Bruno and Rashford aren’t going anywhere. Antony and Garnacho are going to be around for a while. Martinez and Shaw are a great start at the back. I think we need to work around these players to make something work and bring in players to complement what we already have.

De Gea needs fired out of a cannon. Wan-Bissaka isn’t the answer at right back. Varane, as brilliant as he is, isn’t for the long haul and can be replaced by somebody more slick in possession to get into the midfield like we’re seeing with Stones.

Ten Hag is a clever bloke. We just need to back him.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,351
Agree with this wholeheartedly. Players considered our best will force us to play a certain way, which, IMO, is not conducive to getting us back to the top.
The risk is just too big if Ten Hag decides tomorrow he's gonna get rid of Bruno and Rashford to play a different way. The best time to do it was before his first season but he was never gonna get the job if he told our "football people" that.

And of course, he should've gotten rid of De Gea before anyone else. That was his big mistake last summer.
 

Borys

Statistics Wizard
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
9,103
Location
Bielsko Biala, Poland
Eriksen can't play 90 minutes or at pace with the Top teams in the league. That's the issue right now
Did he look to you he was up to a challenge in the first 30 minutes?
Personally I see the issue in him moving at 50% of game speed rather than stamina.

This is patched up midfield. Casemiro always played with two #8s. We are (again) trying to force #10 into midfield.

Our midfielders did very well all things considered, it was never supposed to work against top teams.
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,345
Some of you are going to need to accept that Ten Hag isn’t going to make this team possession-oriented like City. It doesn’t need to be this way either.

That’s not to say we shouldn’t bring in players who can get on the ball calmly, but there’s ways to a top notch football team without necessarily bringing in Frenkie De Jong.

A better goalkeeper and more comfortable defenders in possession down our right side would complement the midfielders we have. I’m not massive on Mason Mount at all, but I’m willing to trust Ten Hag on this one.

We have two of the world’s best players in transition in Bruno and Rashford. Add a striker to that and get more out of Antony and Garnacho and we’re perfectly capable of being a really good team, even without that metronome people understandably want to see at the club.
You can't win leagues without having the majority of possession in most games. It's just a fact of the game. There might be an exception here or there but it is a definite need.
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
6,900
Liverpool were the best team in the world for a period and had the likes of Milner and Henderson in midfield. Fabinho and Wijnaldum weren’t metronomes either.

I understand where people are coming from, but there’s different ways to skin a cat.

The likes of Bruno and Rashford aren’t going anywhere. Antony and Garnacho are going to be around for a while. Martinez and Shaw are a great start at the back. I think we need to work around these players to make something work and bring in players to complement what we already have.

De Gea needs fired out of a cannon. Wan-Bissaka isn’t the answer at right back. Varane, as brilliant as he is, isn’t for the long haul and can be replaced by somebody more slick in possession to get into the midfield like we’re seeing with Stones.

Ten Hag is a clever bloke. We just need to back him.
The way that Liverpool won is by running and being more physical than everyone else. It's tough, creates injuries, and doesn't consistently work because it's a lot of physical pressure.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
You can't win leagues without having the majority of possession in most games. It's just a fact of the game. There might be an exception here or there but it is a definite need.
I wasn’t suggesting we shouldn’t aim to have majority possession in most games. I’m saying that it’s possible without necessarily bringing in somebody like Frenkie De Jong.

Ten Hag may be able to do this through two players playing ahead of Casemiro and bringing in more suitable players in goal and in defence.
 

rollingstoned1

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
1,798
We have no players like a Bernardo or David Silva who can get the ball - and run around with it, without ever losing it. On top of that - Casemiro, Bruno and Eriksen are all slow - so City could outrun us.
Thats just it though, it seems like when we sign these 'techno midget' types - for lack of a better term - like Mata or Kagawa their lack of physicality and/or speed becomes glaringly apparent while if we go the way of Fellaini, McTominay, Matic or even Pogba ( who combined a bit of everything and was supposed to help solve most of the issues) their slowness and lack of technical ability/vision/speed/ Intelligence all become an issue if not being just plain old and past it like Schweinsteiger. It's like permanently playing whack-a-mole tbh when we try to sort something out in that area and it's not heen the same case In other areas of the pitch where we had good strikers, centre halves, full backs and widemen.
Even when we had Scholes and Carrick which looks dandy in hindsight we sought a tenacious, ball winning midfielder very desperately the next summer because it was believed that that was a missing part of the puzzle eg Van bommel, Gattuso, Marcos Senna, Mavuba etc which is why we overpaid for Hargreaves and spent a whole year chasing him.
 
Last edited:

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,345
I wasn’t suggesting we shouldn’t aim to have majority possession in most games. I’m saying that it’s possible without necessarily bringing in somebody like Frenkie De Jong.

Ten Hag may be able to do this through two players playing ahead of Casemiro and bringing in more suitable players in goal and in defence.
But a player like De Jong is the easiest route to control the ball in midfield. Why make it more complicated than it needs to be.

If you want the ball a player that can pass, move with ball and has a great first and second touch seems obvious to me.

Certainly having players in the middle whose weakspot is ball retention is the long way round to improving possession.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
But a player like De Jong is the easiest route to control the ball in midfield. Why make it more complicated than it needs to be.

If you want the ball a player that can pass, move with ball and has a freat first and second touch seems obvious to me.

Certainly having players in the middle whose weakspot is ball retention is the long way round to improving possession.
And Ten Hag clearly agrees, hence we spent a full summer chasing him. Unfortunately, players like that are incredibly rare, so we’ve got to work to find a solution. If he thinks Mount and Bruno playing ahead of Casemiro can work then I’m willing to give him the chance to prove it.

My wider point is that there are different ways and means towards constructing a really good football team. We’re a massive window away from doing that - not that I trust the feckers in charge to actually get it done.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,614
Location
Manc
Its a team game, the midfield is not a separate problem...the defence and attack can help to control the midfield.

Having Martinez at the back helps out the midfield for example.
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,281
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
De Gea kicking it long 9/10 times so we end up losing it... That's what I call a perennial problem.
We just give away domination freely doing that.
Very much this. Surrendering possession non stop due to the keeper is a big problem for us. All the top teams know it too, we don't even have the forward players to make hoofing it viable even if De Gea could kick the ball.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
The way that Liverpool won is by running and being more physical than everyone else. It's tough, creates injuries, and doesn't consistently work because it's a lot of physical pressure.
They also made sure they had full backs who were brilliant in possession, a goalkeeper who could feed the ball into midfield and some proper goalscorers in wide positions. It wasn’t just about the running, albeit I take your point that work rate was a large part of it.

I look at the most successful Bayern sides in recent years as a more realistic template than, say, City. We’re not going to play like them; no point even trying to.
 

arnie_ni

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
15,208
Very much this. Surrendering possession non stop due to the keeper is a big problem for us. All the top teams know it too, we don't even have the forward players to make hoofing it viable even if De Gea could kick the ball.
If we had ballers in midfield we wouldn't go back to ddg as much as we do to begin with. We are scared in there, retreat back to ddg, hump it long, lose possession.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,073
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
We have no players like a Bernardo or David Silva who can get the ball - and run around with it, without ever losing it. On top of that - Casemiro, Bruno and Eriksen are all slow - so City could outrun us.
They're not that good on the ball. But the whole team moves so it always seems like there's an option to pass. They too move without the ball creating triangles and sometimes rectangle of players making themselves available for pass.

Give them McTominay he'll at least be functional, whilst if we got De Bruyne he'll look clueless and ended up doing what Bruno did.
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,345
And Ten Hag clearly agrees, hence we spent a full summer chasing him. Unfortunately, players like that are incredibly rare, so we’ve got to work to find a solution. If he thinks Mount and Bruno playing ahead of Casemiro can work then I’m willing to give him the chance to prove it.

My wider point is that there are different ways and means towards constructing a really good football team. We’re a massive window away from doing that - not that I trust the feckers in charge to actually get it done.
I agree you don't have to play like a Pep team to win a league. You don't have to pass it around quite to that extent.

But if its universally agreed you need the ball to consistently challenge for leagues, ball playing midfielders who can move with the ball are an obvious route to that.

Yeah you can go a different route, have a couple of hardworkers in there and then compensate for them in other areas.

But why bother? Why complicate it?

Complicating it to me is what we've been doing for a decade.
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
6,900
They also made sure they had full backs who were brilliant in possession, a goalkeeper who could feed the ball into midfield and some proper goalscorers in wide positions. It wasn’t just about the running, albeit I take your point that work rate was a large part of it.

I look at the most successful Bayern sides in recent years as a more realistic template than, say, City. We’re not going to play like them; no point even trying to.
They are very well organised and balanced.
 

Licha-Vidic

Last Man Standing 2 finalist 2023/24
Joined
Jan 9, 2023
Messages
1,373
As an outsider. The difference in possession between City and United was daylight. United only looked threatening with a quick release & if the attack was players rushing to goal. If City got back and forced United to consolidate possession you looked lost, aimlessly knocking passes around before someone whipped in a cross from the flanks. Also the fact DDG was knocking it long is a big red flag against his name. He cant play with his feet so has been given an instruction to go long to avoid a costly turnover - basically accommodating his limitations. I would be stunned if ETH has him as your number 1 next season. His long kicks were also rubbish, little chips and knocking it to the halfway line as if it were a strategic long pass. It would have been better if your backline pushed up to the halfway line and DDG just went as long as he can, he should be able to kick the ball three lengths of the field, contest the ball in the air and try to win the second ball in the City half.

Ill tell you another thing, Bruno and Casemiro are not possession players. Bruno is excellent on the break going forward, but being able to retain and recycle possession its not natural to him, likewise Casemiro. Yet these are your two best midfielders. Rashford is another who is lethal on the break, but in tight spaces his lethality dries up. All your best players are geared toward counter attacking, and if you get Harry Kane you would have 4 players totally built for the counter. But is this the brand ETH want to play? Still not sure what the end game is with ETH and what he sees as the end product he is trying to establish.
It's surprising it's an Arsenal fan who has said what I said in January. Maybe it's the reason I was called an opposition fan by many here when I called out our midfield issues as the main problem to where our ceiling is.

I think ETH like many fans here, really think we have good players but it's damn visible how poor we are with some players around. Credit to ETH he really saw Maguire limitations something Ole was unable to see.
Not to pass blame as I usually advocate for managers to be judged by their own merit, but Ole transfers did set the club back tremendously. It has set ETH massively bad in terms of talent, quality and going concern.

If you're honest with yourself the signings of Maguire, Bissaka, VDB, and Bruno, Sancho did make huge dent to how United play, their plan for the future, financial dent, and taking squad space + moving on issues.

This are players who have won fecking NOTHING in their careers came to United in fecking huge money, delivered nothing substantial to United just moments in between, they are not youngsters who will evolve like Garnacho.

In July 3, 2019 City signed Rodri for £62M, their record signing to date.
In August 2, 2019 United signed Maguire for £80M, not United record signing but the most for a defender. We know how it has gone since then. One was relegated many times before he came to united.

Bernardo Silva did cost around 43M.
Our Bruno 47M. We can't compare the two. Both same age, but one has won fecking everything bar UCL, on the brink of a treble, our talisman Bruno has never played in a Champion league Semi Final in his career, HAS NEVER WON A FECKING LEAGUE TITLE in his career yet he is 28 years, but we assume he's the one to lead us to success and deliver on tough high pressure games. We know how Bruno behaves when it get hard, it's not a coincidence when you have never played in high pressure games as a norm.

VDB, Sancho, Bissaka least said of them the better, they did cost the club £153M ( 35+73+45). These chaps have offered nothing to the course of making our club great again not in style of play or even achievements. Absolutely nothing. But we usually try and be lyrical about them every weekend how they will came good how we give them time, how we are not patient with them.

Bruno+VDB cost United £82M yet our midfield is still as it was in 2020. Deep issues of zero control, zero Physicality, zero ball carrying abilities, Zero ball recycling, zero half turn abilities. Remove Casemiro in that midfield we fall in to deeper trenches than before.

I advocated for a midfield overhaul since February, I was called names, same as you I don't see where ETH is going with this midfield +plus it's plan + going concern issues. In 3 years Casemiro will need replacing another dilemma which will caught us off guard as usual. Then we will need replacing aging Casemiro + undelivering Bruno. It's incredible how our fans can't see the big issues we have in the midfield.


City have moved to a 4 man centre midfield of great quality and we can barely field a decent 3.
Another thing I said months before, city have mutated to a midfield 4 with stones tucking in, us we are still a a 2 pivot midfield team. I was told 4231 is just numbers and plans change in the field. :D

We need 2 genuine midfielder to partner Casemiro. Bruno and Eriksen are not. That will relive immense pressure on the team immediately, then solve the strikers issues + physicality problems and goalkeeper issues next.

As I said in February, I will judge ETH with his summer signings, if he fails to address the midfield issues then 100% he will fail here. He needs change of tactics + team structure. Even Arteta did it with great success albeit without winning the league. A bare minimum is 433 setup for now. 3 competent midfielders is a must going forward.
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,281
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
If we had ballers in midfield we wouldn't go back to ddg as much as we do to begin with. We are scared in there, retreat back to ddg, hump it long, lose possession.
I don't buy that as an excuse. If you can't pass back to the keeper it fecks up patterns of play and reduces our passing options. You can argue that our midfield with Eriksen is a little slow, but we have enough technical ability to control possession. But against the very best teams they know all you have to do is press our midfield. They'll pass it back to our defence as they should do and it'll end up at De Gea who'll give back possession.

It's not a one off match for De Gea, happens all of the bloody time. All we ever do is give the ball back cheaply to the opposition and they don't even have to tackle or intercept to do it.

We do need a new playmaker or put Bruno in the playmaker role and have a new Bruno. But Keeper for me should be the number one priority this Summer.
 

TheRedDevil'sAdvocate

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
3,675
Location
The rainbow's end
Its a team game, the midfield is not a separate problem...the defence and attack can help to control the midfield.

Having Martinez at the back helps out the midfield for example.
Of course, it is. People keep saying that we don't stretch defences much, that our FBs don't overlap as much as they should, and that we don't see many runs from the midfield into the final third. But for this to happen, you need possession-safe players all over the pitch. Spot on about Martinez, too. It's important to be able to play out of the back without compromising your attacking shape by having players constantly dropping off to help in the build-up.
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
6,900
It's surprising it's an Arsenal fan who has said what I said in January. Maybe it's the reason I was called an opposition fan by many here when I called out our midfield issues as the main problem to where our ceiling is.

I think ETH like many fans here, really think we have good players but it's damn visible how poor we are with some players around. Credit to ETH he really saw Maguire limitations something Ole was unable to see.
Not to pass blame as I usually advocate for managers to be judged by their own merit, but Ole transfers did set the club back tremendously. It has set ETH massively bad in terms of talent, quality and going concern.

If you're honest with yourself the signings of Maguire, Bissaka, VDB, and Bruno, Sancho did make huge dent to how United play, their plan for the future, financial dent, and taking squad space + moving on issues.

This are players who have won fecking NOTHING in their careers came to United in fecking huge money, delivered nothing substantial to United just moments in between, they are not youngsters who will evolve like Garnacho.

In July 3, 2019 City signed Rodri for £62M, their record signing to date.
In August 2, 2019 United signed Maguire for £80M, not United record signing but the most for a defender. We know how it has gone since then. One was relegated many times before he came to united.

Bernardo Silva did cost around 43M.
Our Bruno 47M. We can't compare the two. Both same age, but one has won fecking everything bar UCL, on the brink of a treble, our talisman Bruno has never played in a Champion league Semi Final in his career, HAS NEVER WON A FECKING LEAGUE TITLE in his career yet he is 28 years, but we assume he's the one to lead us to success and deliver on tough high pressure games. We know how Bruno behaves when it get hard, it's not a coincidence when you have never played in high pressure games as a norm.

VDB, Sancho, Bissaka least said of them the better, they did cost the club £153M ( 35+73+45). These chaps have offered nothing to the course of making our club great again not in style of play or even achievements. Absolutely nothing. But we usually try and be lyrical about them every weekend how they will came good how we give them time, how we are not patient with them.

Bruno+VDB cost United £82M yet our midfield is still as it was in 2020. Deep issues of zero control, zero Physicality, zero ball carrying abilities, Zero ball recycling, zero half turn abilities. Remove Casemiro in that midfield we fall in to deeper trenches than before.

I advocated for a midfield overhaul since February, I was called names, same as you I don't see where ETH is going with this midfield +plus it's plan + going concern issues. In 3 years Casemiro will need replacing another dilemma which will caught us off guard as usual. Then we will need replacing aging Casemiro + undelivering Bruno. It's incredible how our fans can't see the big issues we have in the midfield.




Another thing I said months before, city have mutated to a midfield 4 with stones tucking in, us we are still a a 2 pivot midfield team. I was told 4231 is just numbers and plans change in the field. :D

We need 2 genuine midfielder to partner Casemiro. Bruno and Eriksen are not. That will relive immense pressure on the team immediately, then solve the strikers issues + physicality problems and goalkeeper issues next.

As I said in February, I will judge ETH with his summer signings, if he fails to address the midfield issues then 100% he will fail here. He needs change of tactics + team structure. Even Arteta did it with great success albeit without winning the league. A bare minimum is 433 setup for now. 3 competent midfielders is a must going forward.
Agreed but I don't expect the problems to get fixed imo.
 

arnie_ni

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
15,208
I don't buy that as an excuse. If you can't pass back to the keeper it fecks up patterns of play and reduces our passing options. You can argue that our midfield with Eriksen is a little slow, but we have enough technical ability to control possession. But against the very best teams they know all you have to do is press our midfield. They'll pass it back to our defence as they should do and it'll end up at De Gea who'll give back possession.

It's not a one off match for De Gea, happens all of the bloody time. All we ever do is give the ball back cheaply to the opposition and they don't even have to tackle or intercept to do it.

We do need a new playmaker or put Bruno in the playmaker role and have a new Bruno. But Keeper for me should be the number one priority this Summer.
They don't even really press our midfield. City hardly even shifted out of 2nd gear. Cut of Bruno and with no martinez we have no one to make a cutting edge pass.

Replacing ddg won't fix everything. We need someone in beside casemiro as well.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,130
We don't need to copy City to the tee, but we need to get better at keeping the ball and pinning teams back. We're not going to go anywhere if we're not capable of controlled possession play pinning the best teams back at times and creating superiorities in the half-spaces via controlled possession play. I'm sure ETH realizes this and will try to rectify it in the upcoming windows. We can't rely on transitions only vs the best teams. That limits your team's ceiling. We more than anything need a GK that's very good in distribution, because possession play starts from the back. I'm not expecting us to pass it around like Pep's Barcelona with a new GK, but he will make a sizable improvement to our build-up. More press resistant/ball carriers in midfield are also needed. I was against signing Mount, but if ETH is going to copy his system from his later seasons at Ajax, he's a very good fit(presuming we don't go overboard with the fee and wages).

All of the CL winners in the past decade + were very good to excellent in possession. There's 1 anomaly now and then, but that's not the norm.

Liverpool were a similar transition team like us with Klopp at the start, but Klopp realized that's tiring/too chance based vs the best teams. He brought in an assistant and they slowly reverted to a positional play system. They became much better at controlled possession play along with their usual very good counter pressing. They pretty much played City at their 'own game' with tweaks here and there obviously during their best seasons. Most of their best games vs City, they had similar territorial/possession dominance as City do.
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,281
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
They don't even really press our midfield. City hardly even shifted out of 2nd gear. Cut of Bruno and with no martinez we have no one to make a cutting edge pass.

Replacing ddg won't fix everything. We need someone in beside casemiro as well.
Replacing DDG helps massively. Why do you think Pep brought in Ederson so quickly? If you want to play modern football it's essential you have a keeper that can play football. It's a vital cog in the machine.

Doesn't matter who you sign in midfield if our keeper continues to hit long balls and give away possession on a regular basis. He's not even a reliable shot stopper anymore either.

Bring in a modern keeper and our football will be much better. If we continue with De Gea we will continue to play like shit next season. Nothing will change.
 

ryansgirl

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2001
Messages
2,914
Location
where the sun rises
A team plays to its strengths - and in that glorious era of Sir Alex, Manchester United played far better with the successful teams than we`ve ever seen after his retirement regardless of their names. Note how on the relative occasions when a big name was bought like Veron, the team didn`t necessarily do better and tended to be off-balance.

And the togetherness of the team has never been the same - I would argue United has never achieved that kind of unity on-field regardless of whether players like Teddy and Andy loathed each other off-field. Yes, we do need a new goalkeeper - badly - as well as other signings but there has to be a shift occurring at a deeper level.

Some people on here keep referencing City`s money but United have splashed the cash too and without any real level of success post Sir Alex. But that goal from City within 12 seconds was just freakish - how do you defend against that? The United lads can hold their heads high - they made a game of it but the combination of a freak goal and a goalkeeper that doesn`t inspire confidence now with all his limits coming to the fore scuttled it.
 

Licha-Vidic

Last Man Standing 2 finalist 2023/24
Joined
Jan 9, 2023
Messages
1,373
I don't buy that as an excuse. If you can't pass back to the keeper it fecks up patterns of play and reduces our passing options. You can argue that our midfield with Eriksen is a little slow, but we have enough technical ability to control possession. But against the very best teams they know all you have to do is press our midfield. They'll pass it back to our defence as they should do and it'll end up at De Gea who'll give back possession.

It's not a one off match for De Gea, happens all of the bloody time. All we ever do is give the ball back cheaply to the opposition and they don't even have to tackle or intercept to do it.

We do need a new playmaker or put Bruno in the playmaker role and have a new Bruno. But Keeper for me should be the number one priority this Summer.
Very skewed way of thinking. De Gea will lose the ball say 10 times in a game with ball clearance yet Bruno will try flicks, fall over when pressed, give mispass more than 10 times in a game.
Also is natural the game will be played more with on field players more than goalkeeper.
De Gea is a very big issues but how we hold on to the ball especially in midfield is the biggest issue.

The game is played in the 80% of the pitch (10% each goalkeeper D area) , that's why football is a game of less chances + goals. It's not a basketball game.

How you behave and take care of ball in those other period determines alot than just a keeper kicking a goalkick directly to rashford head. Rashford can pass to Bruno who then tries a flick and loses the ball, then we blame De Gea?

By the way De Gea and Bruno are just same thing in different position.
Physically zero presence, can pull off worldclass save/assist in moments, very poor in possession, they have alot of misplassed passes in them, you know what to expect of them never a 7-8 every game like Martinez.
 
Last edited:

Cathy Ferguson

Full Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Messages
3,957
It's surprising it's an Arsenal fan who has said what I said in January. Maybe it's the reason I was called an opposition fan by many here when I called out our midfield issues as the main problem to where our ceiling is.

I think ETH like many fans here, really think we have good players but it's damn visible how poor we are with some players around. Credit to ETH he really saw Maguire limitations something Ole was unable to see.
Not to pass blame as I usually advocate for managers to be judged by their own merit, but Ole transfers did set the club back tremendously. It has set ETH massively bad in terms of talent, quality and going concern.

If you're honest with yourself the signings of Maguire, Bissaka, VDB, and Bruno, Sancho did make huge dent to how United play, their plan for the future, financial dent, and taking squad space + moving on issues.

This are players who have won fecking NOTHING in their careers came to United in fecking huge money, delivered nothing substantial to United just moments in between, they are not youngsters who will evolve like Garnacho.

In July 3, 2019 City signed Rodri for £62M, their record signing to date.
In August 2, 2019 United signed Maguire for £80M, not United record signing but the most for a defender. We know how it has gone since then. One was relegated many times before he came to united.

Bernardo Silva did cost around 43M.
Our Bruno 47M. We can't compare the two. Both same age, but one has won fecking everything bar UCL, on the brink of a treble, our talisman Bruno has never played in a Champion league Semi Final in his career, HAS NEVER WON A FECKING LEAGUE TITLE in his career yet he is 28 years, but we assume he's the one to lead us to success and deliver on tough high pressure games. We know how Bruno behaves when it get hard, it's not a coincidence when you have never played in high pressure games as a norm.

VDB, Sancho, Bissaka least said of them the better, they did cost the club £153M ( 35+73+45). These chaps have offered nothing to the course of making our club great again not in style of play or even achievements. Absolutely nothing. But we usually try and be lyrical about them every weekend how they will came good how we give them time, how we are not patient with them.

Bruno+VDB cost United £82M yet our midfield is still as it was in 2020. Deep issues of zero control, zero Physicality, zero ball carrying abilities, Zero ball recycling, zero half turn abilities. Remove Casemiro in that midfield we fall in to deeper trenches than before.

I advocated for a midfield overhaul since February, I was called names, same as you I don't see where ETH is going with this midfield +plus it's plan + going concern issues. In 3 years Casemiro will need replacing another dilemma which will caught us off guard as usual. Then we will need replacing aging Casemiro + undelivering Bruno. It's incredible how our fans can't see the big issues we have in the midfield.




Another thing I said months before, city have mutated to a midfield 4 with stones tucking in, us we are still a a 2 pivot midfield team. I was told 4231 is just numbers and plans change in the field. :D

We need 2 genuine midfielder to partner Casemiro. Bruno and Eriksen are not. That will relive immense pressure on the team immediately, then solve the strikers issues + physicality problems and goalkeeper issues next.

As I said in February, I will judge ETH with his summer signings, if he fails to address the midfield issues then 100% he will fail here. He needs change of tactics + team structure. Even Arteta did it with great success albeit without winning the league. A bare minimum is 433 setup for now. 3 competent midfielders is a must going forward.
Agreed. One CM is not enough. Sabitzer is leaving and Donny should be sold. I would keep McTominay and sell Fred.

Ideally we also need two strikers but Martial is impossible to sell and will serve as a backup.

We played our best football when we beat Barca and the form since then has been a concern. We are mediocre going forward and create too few chances. This should be prio 1 this summer.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,840
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
We're moving in the right direction. Next season looks like being Casemiro behind Mount and Fernandes with Eriksen as backup. That's immeasurably better than what we have had for the previous 4/5 seasons.
 

BorisManUtd

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
3,881
We do need another player next to Casemiro and Bruno in midfield but I'd add another younger DM when/if we sell McTominay. Casemiro is quality but he's 31 and can't be our only option in that position. Especially as he also showed some weaknesses at times.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,840
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
Very skewed way of thinking. De Gea will lose the ball say 10 times in a game with ball clearance yet Bruno will try flicks, fall over when pressed, give mispass more than 10 times in a game.
Also is natural the game will be played more with on field players more than goalkeeper.
De Gea is a very big issues but how we hold on to the ball especially in midfield is the biggest issue.
The game is played in the 80% of the pitch (10% each goalkeeper D area) , that's why football is a game of less chances + goals. It's not a basketball game. How you behave and take care of ball in those other period determines alot than just a keeper kicking a goalkick directly to rashford head.
De Gea gave the ball back to City 20 times yesterday. For context, the City GK lost possession 4 times.

You say it isn't a basketball game, but it becomes exactly that when our goalkeeper keeps punting it straight back to the opposition because he can't clip a pass to the fullback or fizz one into the CM
 

Tango80

Full Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
371
I've always yoyod between whether we need a midfielder ahead of a keeper, and I think we probably do.

You plan you the team you want in 2-3 years, not the team you want next season. In a couple of years, all but McTom will be in their thirties. That needs addressing right away.

I'm not sure on Mount but he at least fits the right profile.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
The copying City thing is overly reductive. There's a whole ocean wide gap between emulating Pep's type of football and being able to withstand that type of football without luck or gimmicks. Both require technical players who aren't allergic to having the ball longer than a nanosecond.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,978
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
If we had ballers in midfield we wouldn't go back to ddg as much as we do to begin with. We are scared in there, retreat back to ddg, hump it long, lose possession.
That's really not the case. The likes of Ederson, Alisson, Neuer, Onana, Costa, etc all get on the ball significantly more than De Gea does. Teams that try to dominate possession normally tend to involve their goalkeepers quite a lot, using them as an extra man to create overloads in other areas of the field. It's why De Gea has almost doubled how many passes he makes per game this season (yet he's still well behind the keepers I mentioned) as ETH wants to do that as well. It's just that DDG is terrible at it, but ETH probably doesn't want to completely abandon the ethos of his playstyle (he's already had to make some adjustments for De Gea's limitations).
 

iato89

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 18, 2020
Messages
137
We need 2 midfielders. Erisken is good technically but he lacks pace and cant sustain 90min, he will be a superb squad player but we need someone more energetic to start and thats why I think ETH wants Mount. Apart from Mount we still need another solid cm like rice or caceido, both can carry the ball and have a good pass in them. With 2 such players we can rest Casemiro and not overplay him, same goes for bruno. Our midfield will transform if we bring these 2 in and let go of either or both of Mcfred.