Sir A1ex
Full Member
I don't really understand.Since the Red Knights have still not actually revealed who would be investing as part of their bid, I see no reason to believe that they would effectively reduce the debt burden on the club. I would feel far more comfortable if the identities of the investors were revealed so that their previous investment records could be scrutinised to see what their priorities are likely to be.
It could be that some members of the consortium have a history of asset-stripping companies for their own gain, or have made their money from less than ethical means.
The leaders of the consortium (O'Niell, Harris, Rawlinson, Marshall, Hytner etc) spent ages investigating potential investment sources, and vetting them on their intentions and track records.
Do you think that they will not have managed to do this properly and you could do better, or is it these leaders of the consortium whose motives you're questioning?