UNITED ACADEMY
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2018
- Messages
- 13,127
- Supports
- Erik ten Hag
The main thing you see in my point should not be about money but about how the club can progress to challenge the league. The club can't progress to that level if the club has no money to sign a midfielder after losing Pogba for free.So it's all about the money for you?
United will weigh all this up won't they? They'll have far more qualified people than you or me to figure out what's the best for Manchester United PLC and Manchester United football club.
You still seem absolutely certain a bid would come in for £50 million, I genuinely don't think it will. If it doesn't, then all of your arguments are null and void.
If it does and United reject it then you would assume they have calculated every outcome and possible future investments required for replacements and still decided it was the right thing to do.
If he does leave, then fingers crossed they go and sign a replacement.
In your worst case scenario, Pogba goes on a free. If Pogba goes on a free, I guarantee, we still go out and buy a midfielder, I promise you. Don't worry about the money side of it when the truth is, no one has any feckin idea about the ins and outs of the situation.
The club can continue to progress to challenge the league whether Pogba is cashed in for a new midfielder or Pogba signs a new contract.
My argument wouldn't be null and void because you are forgetting the important part that what stopping Pogba to move to PSG is not only about our demand but also the agent fee demand. I keep saying this multiple times that Pogba has the power to make it clear to his agent and club just like Varane did to Real. There is a reason I repeated this every bloody day