ivaldo
Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2012
- Messages
- 28,699
Let's use your phrasing:Because that's exactly what he should be doing in midfield two. Why is that weird? The same criticism is aimed towards Fred and McTominay.
It's just very difficult role to play, especially in current United side.
Kante is a box to box player, very strong defensively but he also has a drive forward. I don't think it's beneficial to make him pure defensively focused player, as last season for Chelsea shown how much he can offer in general play.
Also, if Kante can't do it on his own (he clearly couldn't against Switzerland), I'd like the second midfielder to help him out even if that makes him play deeper and also less threatening. A lot of people think differently - that Pogba being creative force in midfield makes him immune to criticism concerning his off the ball performance. I strongly disagree with that statement simply because playing an attacking midfielder in center areas doesn't make us a better team. I prefer team balance over individual brilliance.
Pogba is a creative midfielder, very strong on the ball but also helps our defensively.
Despite this, your expectations of Pogba compared to another class midfielder is entirely different. Why isn't that weird? Fred and Mctominay aren't as good as Pogba going forward or on the ball, and they aren't as good as Kante off it. Criticism isn't remotely comparable.
Take two:
Also, if Pogba can't do it all on his own, I'd like the second midfielder to help him out even if it means he has to play slightly further forward and less safe.
I don't think it makes him immune at all. It's the double standards I don't like. Pogba being weaker is a big issue, where's defensive players being weaker going forward is completely fine. It's part of their role. Conversely, other attacking/creative midfielders don't nearly have the expectation Pogba has to be extremely efficient in all areas of the pitch.