Giggs had 3 games as Utd manager. You're really clutching at straws there.First job in management is not normally an international high level job though is it? At least Giggs spent a bit of time as Utd manager. Neville has done nothing.
Giggs had 3 games as Utd manager. You're really clutching at straws there.First job in management is not normally an international high level job though is it? At least Giggs spent a bit of time as Utd manager. Neville has done nothing.
Three games. Phil has spent more time coaching and working directly with players than Giggs has done.First job in management is not normally an international high level job though is it? At least Giggs spent a bit of time as Utd manager. Neville has done nothing.
I also believe that Giggs shouldnt have got the Wales job for the same reasons as Neville but even at that pathetically low level of management experience it still craps all over Phil Neville's.Giggs had 3 games as Utd manager. You're really clutching at straws there.
So coaching is the same as being a team manager now?Three games. Phil has spent more time coaching and working directly with players than Giggs has done.
Clearly the appointment though had more to do with profile that Phil Neville would bring but he has his own merits.
Generally one leads to the other. Plus international managers are more coaches than managers anyway as they have less of the off field matters to deal with.So coaching is the same as being a team manager now?
Not to say I'm agreeing with either side but there's a huge difference between "vastly more experienced " as he said and "vastly experienced" as you quoted him as saying.So less than a year as Scotland manager makes her 'vastly experienced as a manager of an international woman's team'.
It's not the same though is it.Generally one leads to the other.
It's certainly a reasonable step in someone's development to management.So coaching is the same as being a team manager now?
No but they are linked. Being a coach at a top club is probably better for your experience than managing a League 2 side.It's not the same though is it.
I disagree with that - it gives you no experience of being a team manager which is a different role. I'd rather see a guy (or girl) who has worked in the lower leagues learning his trade as a manager get a job before somebody who has been a coach at a top club. Maybe that's just me.No but they are linked. Being a coach at a top club is probably better for your experience than managing a League 2 side.
I think so.I disagree with that - it gives you no experience of being a team manager which is a different role. I'd rather see a guy (or girl) who has worked in the lower leagues learning his trade as a manager get a job before somebody who has been a coach at a top club. Maybe that's just me.
I'm not sure that's true, is it?Three games. Phil has spent more time coaching and working directly with players than Giggs has done.
Clearly the appointment though had more to do with profile that Phil Neville would bring but he has his own merits.
Apparently. But no one seems to be sure who they are.Why was he getting the job anyway? Is there not a queue of experienced female coaches, who've worked their way up for years managing women's teams to success? Why would you just go and appoint Phil Neville?
Unfortunately not no, quite a lot of the people that the FA wanted turned down the chance to take the role (one even went to the Canadian men's team from their excellent women's side), so it was fast becoming a job where no-one really wanted it, so in a way Phil got it purely because he seemed to have been the only person who said yes to the job, male or female.Why was he getting the job anyway? Is there not a queue of experienced female coaches, who've worked their way up for years managing women's teams to success? Why would you just go and appoint Phil Neville?
Phil and Gary's mother, Meville Neville.So which woman do you think should have got the job?
Surely Cina’s.My mum.
yeah in a way, he's a big name who will bring professionalism etc, one would presume - the FA is making a statement about how seriously it takes women's footy & so on - it's the underlying assumption that women-footy needs to be just like bloke-footy that is the problem for meStrange appointment. Just seems like an attempt to put a big name in to drum up interest in a minority sport.
Mo Marley I thought should have been appointed. She’s worked with the same players at youth levels. This is currently a very talented crop of English players. One of the best teams in the world, I hope this appointment makes the most of the talent available.Never heard of her. What makes her better qualified for the job than Phil Neville?
According to Redrom she wasn't interested in the job.Mo Marley I thought should have been appointed. She’s worked with the same players at youth levels. This is currently a very talented crop of English players. One of the best teams in the world, I hope this appointment makes the most of the talent available.
She applied for the role but then withdrew it. Who knows why, but it’s a shame as she should have been given or shown more confidence by the FA.According to Redrom she wasn't interested in the job.
You wonder how it will go for him in the job, he has a mark against his name before he has even started. Why do they not just appoint a woman to the job, although I suppose that could be perceived as prejudiced/discriminatory if they did and only considered women candidates for the post. I don't say that in a way that is meant to be condescending or dismissive of women's football, just that if they had a female coach they could see how it goes and avoid all these types of scandals arising from having a male in the job.
The last coach left under a cloud and now Neville has raised a bit of a storm before he has even got his feet under the desk, which means everything he does will be under even more scrutiny than it normally would be.
He's very shifty when it comes to social media, when he's been a pundit before he's acted dumb denying any knowledge, which is very strange.Ian Dennis, the BBC journalist said he was with Phil was last week and he told him he was off Twitter; which is clearly bollocks as he's started following all the women players since; which you wouldn't do if you were not on, or even planning on quitting within a few days.
Second point is that I don't understand how someone with such a lack of experience has managed to get this type of position. It's almost as if they're not taking it seriously, and just want people focusing on the women's game now they have a man with a slight profile within football.
Not like people pulled quotes from when be was a teenager he was a grown man when he said those quotes.His comments aren’t good, however I see the fashion of digging up historical tweets strikes again, people are aware views can change over time?
I think the tweets are relevant given the role is managing a women's football team.His comments aren’t good, however I see the fashion of digging up historical tweets strikes again, people are aware views can change over time?
I don't think Phil has grown any further brain cells since 2012, sadly.His comments aren’t good, however I see the fashion of digging up historical tweets strikes again, people are aware views can change over time?
That happened when he made the move to Everton.Do not get P Neville wanting this job.
Forget any sexist talk but this job is such a low standard. Let’s be honest about it woman’s football, the national team, ranks so low down in the over all football standings. The quality, I’d say, is probably level 10 or 11 in the football pyramid.
Surely if he is serious about enhancing his coaching/managerial career then an attainable lower league job is the direction he should be heading. This job will finish him as a serious football man.