Mikel has to be the best signing. We made money on that affair.
Yeah but Mikel lost a lot of face Georgie Best, if he had signed for Chelsea first that lost money could've went towards a decent fourth choice centreback. I thought this thread was who for their "own interests" should not have signed for United rather than for United's interests. For example Gascoigne, Fergie
may've saved his career, but frankly I don't see how anyone could, he probably would've been sold like McGrath.
Personally, I feel Mikel would've been better off not signing for United.
Arguably a controversal one is Gerard Piqué, who could've probably developed even more by just staying at Barcelona, his time at United seems to be just a spell of homesickness and or arrested development, a lot of his development came from a loan that he made while at United. Barcelona could've done that without Piqué needing to move home.
Just looking at the question without redtinted glasses.