alexthelion
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2019
- Messages
- 3,624
Correct.34% possession, 3 shots, 2.81 - 0.86 xG. Don’t be fooled by this meek surrender. It was dog shit.
Correct.34% possession, 3 shots, 2.81 - 0.86 xG. Don’t be fooled by this meek surrender. It was dog shit.
It was 1-1 mate.34% possession, 3 shots, 2.81 - 0.86 xG. Don’t be fooled by this meek surrender. It was dog shit.
If he had passed to Rashford who was offside I would have personally kicked his backside.That was an important point at the league leaders and to stop the rot and Watford.
A very cool finish from Sancho for that goal which will do him good.He'd have been crucified had he missed with Rashers free to his left.
I haven't really seen any happy clappers so I'm not really sure what you're railing against.Feck all time! He's been part of the management for ages.
There's making a team hard to beat and then there's not even making an effort to attack, even on the break. His "tactics" were to play 11 behind the ball and hope not to concede. Even then, Chelsea should have scored a few.
Pardon me for not being a happy clapper at this abject performance.
He's one of many unintelligent players in our team. Sancho is one of our few intelligent players.Mad thing about Sancho's goal was if he'd chosen to slide Rashford in instead of passing it into the net, Marcus would have been offside.
During their run towards the goal together after Jorghino's miscontrol Rashford was in an offside position for most of it.....mindless stuff!
But but but the xG!!!!It was 1-1 mate.
That final was 2.26 - 1.54 in United’s favour regarding xG.Mother of God. If one more person mentions xg. I swear most of you would been in here bitching about our possession stats after we beat Bayern in the Nou Camp. Take a night off. New dawn tomorrow. We'll see if Ralf can bring ye some pleasure.
It wasn’t good but the xG stats are a bit crap without context… 1.7 of that is from 23 shots. None of which were decent chances.34% possession, 3 shots, 2.81 - 0.86 xG. Don’t be fooled by this meek surrender. It was dog shit.
Yeah well of course. The demands and expectations are completely different. Ole had been here 3 yrs with a remit to get us challenging. While carrick is a temporary manager with no managerial experience. Who in their right mid would criticize Carrick for parking the bus? Why would you expect Carrick to get us playing any better than before?No, exactly the opposite.
If that perfermance had been when Ole was manager, those defending/making excuses for Carrick would be rounding on Ole vehemently.
Sorry I really do. It was well deserved. I don't equate deserving to possession or number of shots. Similarly how I feel to Villarreal. Both of these results were not lucky flukes. We got what WE deserved.Oh come on, you surely don't believe that was a deserved point? We were thoroughly outplayed for 94 minutes, our only saving grace was that Chelsea were shite at putting their chances away.
Rashford was, as usual, offside. You really have to wonder if he has a footballing brain at all.That was an important point at the league leaders and to stop the rot and Watford.
A very cool finish from Sancho for that goal which will do him good.He'd have been crucified had he missed with Rashers free to his left.
You're correct. We're performing very poorly in the performance league. Which is what it's all about.So?
Was it a good performance or not?
Mostly by those who have been crucifying Ole for the past three yearsThat's it. I'm out of this thread.
Everyone knows this was a great result.
Take note: Things have changed. You must be positive now. If you complain about performances you will be labelled as a "miserable bastard" or a "moaner". Our club is on the way up.
Got nothing against the resultthey've been good/great.But it come back to the same point. He's the caretaker for a few games til Rangnick comes in and has gotten two good results so what is there to get worked up over? It beggars belief
Fair point but we played as the clear inferior and stole a point ultimately. We should demand better.It wasn’t good but the xG stats are a bit crap without context… 1.7 of that is from 23 shots. None of which were decent chances.
Only three attempts had an xG of better than 0.09 which is pretty low.
Unsure I was quite pissed.So?
Was it a good performance or not?
Seems you watch with different specs on to me, then.Sorry I really do. It was well deserved. I don't equate deserving to possession or number of shots. Similarly how I feel to Villarreal. Both of these results were not lucky flukes. We got what WE deserved.
From defending the indefensible you have turned the other way. Ole is still at fault, nothing has changed about that.Mostly by those who have been crucifying Ole for the past three years
How the times have changed.
Bit of apointless post but I will answer anyway.You're correct. We're performing very poorly in the performance league. Which is what it's all about.
Ole was at fault I agree, but he was not the only one.From defending the indefensible you have turned the other way. Ole is still at fault, nothing has changed about that.
Exactly. It really is very simple. People frothing at the mouth over this performance when its a caretaker manager in charge, for most likely the last time too, is frankly baffling, this place somehow reaches new lows every week.I haven't really seen any happy clappers so I'm not really sure what you're railing against.
You do understand the coach does what the manager says? Now he's manager he's making all the decisions for himself and he's clearly doing things differently to Ole and yes he had feck all time to get a team at rock bottom to play two tough games.
But it come back to the same point. He's the caretaker for a few games til Rangnick comes in and has gotten two good results so what is there to get worked up over? It beggars belief
I was overjoyed at that result but how that performance makes you think we will get 4th is astonishing.Chelsea won't drop many points at home this season, they were the netter team overall but a very nice point to build on.
We should see 4th at a minimum now.
Lingard almost lost us the game with that idiotic dribble at the end of the game. WTF was he thinking.Ronaldo sub killed off the game, we were ticking before that.
Lingard sub 100% did kill it off, don't understand that sub.
Bruno should of been taken off 20 mins before he did, was awful.
Can't believe that I'm saying it but besides that kind of harsh penalty and those subs, the game was ours for the taking.
If maguire was playing we would of lost that one horribly. I hope we play Bailly + Varane going forward.
Yes, I couldn't believe what I was seeing. Fortunately, Sancho had the composure to avoid passing and delivered a cool finish. But, Rashford didn't offer him an option then. Madness!Can't get over the fact that Rashford was still running into an offside position when they were clear for the goal. Could it be that this guy has no idea how the concept of offside works?
Anyway good result, I'll take Carrick over Ole any day.
I found that so funny, can’t believe he was offsideRashford was, as usual, offside. You really have to wonder if he has a footballing brain at all.
Great point. Maybe we should try a different manager?Bit of apointless post but I will answer anyway.
Can't be this lucky all the time, performances do matter ultimately if you want to do better.
Anthony Taylor