mu4c_20le
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 43,840
No, keeper interferenceWas Antonio blocking Azpilicueta from blocking the shot?
No, keeper interferenceWas Antonio blocking Azpilicueta from blocking the shot?
Kepa was screaming his head off straight away.Rubbish. If no VAR, that would have been given all day long. Chelsea didn't even appeal.
Yep same thing, its harsh on the scoring team but technically the correct call.After they ruled out Calvert Lewins against United they had no choice but to rule out that one.
I mean he obviously wasn't interfering with the keeper, what I was thinking is maybe they thought Antonio was interfering with Azpilicueta which is why they didn't give it.No, keeper interference
Did it? You sure?thought it was clear offside personally. it touched him on the way in. whats the issue?
Totally misread this as you'd had enough of the match and were off to please yourselfTurning this off now, wank match up to now and then this
Those Chelsea Wnkers appeal everything. Doesn’t mean they’re rightKepa was screaming his head off straight away.
To be fair we all have since you lot beat City.I think Neville has been drinking.
Yeh similar to the Sigurdson one vs us in the last minute. Interfering with the keeper is the rule so I think it’s actually the correct decision.That didn't touch Antonio but I guess there was interference. The guy was laying on the floor in front of Kepa
Totally misread this as you'd had enough of the match and were off to please yourself