Kewell and Viduka certainly are. Dacort as well.Those players you mentioned are hardly associated with Leeds when you think of their careers.
Kewell and Viduka certainly are. Dacort as well.Those players you mentioned are hardly associated with Leeds when you think of their careers.
Yep, those two, that's about it. Can't barely remember Dacort.Kewell and Viduka certainly are. Dacort as well.
Bowyer and Woodgate as well given the court case.Yep, those two, that's about it. Can't barely remember Dacort.
Yup but in reality we can placed well below those clubs pre-takeover because we were so shite for the 20 years before hand while they were still picking up occasional cups.And Chelsea. They have had a rise similar to 12-?? current City.
Stephen McPhail and Seth Johnson.Those players you mentioned are hardly associated with Leeds when you think of their careers.
When you mention Woodgate all I think of is Euro'96 Penalties and WC'18.Bowyer and Woodgate as well given the court case.
Sure, just ignore the factual data and go with your gut instinct I guess.Nope. If Leeds and City reversed roles right now Leeds would be a monster club.
Doesn't really matter, if Qatar don't get Leeds they will buy another club. They want the PL money so there will soon be two state backed clubs in this country.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Historically, Leeds are bigger than City. Not now of course as they went into the wilderness and City got rich and have won silverware recently. It’s not an insult towards City as they have become huge. Leeds were just a more famous team. Same could be said of Newcastle.Sure, just ignore the factual data and go with your gut instinct I guess.
Leeds won their first trophy in 68, the league cup. They have won 5 in their total history. They won 4 of those 5 between 68 to 74. City won 4 trophies between 68 to 70. They have spent much longer in lower leagues than City ever have while having on average much lower attendances. City were and are a much bigger club, unless you of course ignore facts.Historically, Leeds are bigger than City. Not now of course as they went into the wilderness and City got rich and have won silverware recently. It’s not an insult towards City as they have become huge. Leeds were just a more famous team. Same could be said of Newcastle.
Quite. Those facts have already been posted in the thread and are easily located on google. He either knows nothing about football history or he’s on the wind-up, or both.Leeds won their first trophy in 68, the league cup. They have won 5 in their total history. They won 4 of those 5 between 68 to 74. City won 4 trophies between 68 to 70. They have spent much longer in lower leagues than City ever have while having on average much lower attendances. City were and are a much bigger club, unless you of course ignore facts.
Spurs? Leicester? They've not just competed with the rich clubs, they've done better.Fellow Man Utd fans, do you really believe that clubs such as Leeds etc. can compete with Man Utd and the other big/top clubs without outside investment? The days of building up your club to the top is gone with all the money being generated in the PL especially in the UCL spots. It's pretty tone deaf to stick your nose up at teams needing investment as the way football is setup currently, it is nigh on impossible to close the gap.
Why should they have a right to compete with the top clubs? Leeds missed out on the peak PL money years because they tried to get greedy and ended up shooting themselves in the foot. No sympathy for them. Plenty of teams have made it to the PL just by being well run and well managed, without the need for crazy cash injections.Fellow Man Utd fans, do you really believe that clubs such as Leeds etc. can compete with Man Utd and the other big/top clubs without outside investment? The days of building up your club to the top is gone with all the money being generated in the PL especially in the UCL spots. It's pretty tone deaf to stick your nose up at teams needing investment as the way football is setup currently, it is nigh on impossible to close the gap.
Yep. Spurs net spend over the last 10 years is just £15m - an average of £1.5m per season. The money saved has gone into our new training centre and stadium.Spurs? Leicester? They've not just competed with the rich clubs, they've done better.
Spending 100s of millions is a monster shortcut but it's been done in the past and it'll be done again.
This !Why should they have a right to compete with the top clubs? Leeds missed out on the peak PL money years because they tried to get greedy and ended up shooting themselves in the foot. No sympathy for them. Plenty of teams have made it to the PL just by being well run and well managed, without the need for crazy cash injections.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Utd cant compete with the top clubs - City, PSG, Barca etc let alone Leeds. Yes there are and always will be outliers - Leicester, this year the scousers have done well. But generally the Oil Rich clubs will win 90 percent of the trophies until something changes.Fellow Man Utd fans, do you really believe that clubs such as Leeds etc. can compete with Man Utd and the other big/top clubs without outside investment? The days of building up your club to the top is gone with all the money being generated in the PL especially in the UCL spots. It's pretty tone deaf to stick your nose up at teams needing investment as the way football is setup currently, it is nigh on impossible to close the gap.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.in...-leeds-the-next-step-as-with-9116168.html?ampHow is this legal? It seems weird how PSG owners can own a team in Europe that could play them potentially, same goes with the RB teams, Salzburg + Leipzig
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Before I start just joined the board I am a Leeds fan so my views my differ to the majority on this board, so just so you know I’m not on wind up with my postsIn what way are they bigger may i ask?
Before City were taken over it was
League Titles: City 2 - Leeds 3
FA Cups: City 4 - Leeds 1
League Cups: City 2 - Leeds 1
European Trophies: City 1 - 0 Leeds.
Great post fair play, I wasn't trying to belittle Leeds at all. The inner cities fairs cup isn't acknowledged by Uefa and I have very little knowledge of it or what it is, I'll be honeest and say I genuinely thought it was a cup that was only played at trade fairs, it was upon googling I realized it grew into the Uefa/Europa. Fair play on letting me know.Before I start just joined the board I am a Leeds fan so my views my differ to the majority on this board, so just so you know I’m not on wind up with my posts
I saw this post & couldn’t help but join to correct a few things.
The last part regarding European trophies is wrong
Leeds won the inter cities fairs (europa league) cup twice in the late 60’s early 70’s so they still have more European trophies to their name.
Whilst no one forgets the runners up in these finals between the mid 60’s to mid mid 70’s
Leeds won the league in 2 times & were runners up 5 times won it again in 92
Fa Cup winners once
Fa Cup runners up 3 times
League cup winners once
Runners up once
Charity shield winners once& won it again in 92
Runners up once
Inter cities fairs cup winners twice runners up once
Cup winners cup runners up once
European cup runners up once
So in the space of 10 years Leeds competed in 13 cup finals & either won or finished 2nd in 7 league campaigns. 2 of the european finals the refs were never allowed the ref games again due to the being bent & that includes the European cup final
Whilst I know man united dwarf that with their 20 years of dominance. City have had a very good 10 years, on the back of being backed by millions.
I saw a few posts stating they had a little success in the early 90’s that’s true in actual fact we had a very good 90’s barring a couple years we were never out of the top 5/6 in the league, which now would be looked at like we were part of the big 6.
90/91 4th
91/92 1st
92/93 17th
93/94 5th
94/95 5th
95/96 13th
96/97 11th
97/98 5th
98/99 4th
99/00 3rd
Then going into the 00’s obviously
00/01 4th
01/02 5th
Before it went wrong
02/03 15th
03/04 19th
So in theory we were part of the top table at the time & missing out on the champions league on occasion as there were only 3 places up for grabs, city meanwhile had a comparable time in the 90’s being relegated to division 2 & yo/yoing around the 1st & prem.
We managed to get to the CL semi final which city have only been able to manage despite being back by millions & millions have obviously have been further than city previously in the 70’s. so I would say city’s
As for why would QSI look to invest in Leeds we’re a 1 club city with the highest income 45 millions in the championship barring those with parachute payments.
We were on tv 22 times this year due to the high audiences we bring in. Problem is for all that we received approx 5/6 in tv money compared to the those in the prem but there is money to be made through that type of exposure with Leeds in the prem through sponsorship etc
As a city it’s attractive with the biggest financial economy in the north.
Our owner & the PSG owners are good pals have been for a number of years. We already have links on our board to to Qatar’s aspire academy used to develop their players for the next World Cup.
Whilst have been out of the premier league for so long we may not have the exposure in foreign markets like America & China.we have massive followings across the uk & Ireland. Australia thanks to kewell & Viduka. Massive support in Scandinavia (see the guy who plays Jamie Lannister in game of thrones) who is from Denmark. & we have Bielsa who has brought the spotlight back on us, love us or hate us we’ve been talked about all over the world because of him this season. All our games have been shown in Argentina also. The foundations are there, far more than the likes of wolves etc who are starting from scratch.
Whilst I don’t expect them to buy us out in full this summer an investment with a view to buying the majority upon promotion. Do I think we’ll be throwing cash around no ffp wouldn’t allow as city & Chelsea got away with it before ffp came in. But will Leeds be able to break the top 8 with good backing absolutely & over time with money are we big enough to sneak in to the top 4 absolutely. It may be slow & steady as they’ll still have PSG who are in the CL every year but the league doesn’t get the exposure the prem does around the world on weekly basis so eventually you never know.
Anyway sorry for the long post I only get 3 for being a newbie so if I don’t respond that’s why
That was a good post. Question, how did you go from winning the league in 92 to finishing 17th in 93? I remember you being the last winners of the old first division but completely forgot what happened the year after. What the hell did happen?snip
We didn’t really move on from the 92 team. We were rumoured with shearer at the time but that never came off, we bought rocastle past his best.That was a good post. Question, how did you go from winning the league in 92 to finishing 17th in 93? I remember you being the last winners of the old first division but completely forgot what happened the year after. What the hell did happen?