- Joined
- Oct 3, 2016
- Messages
- 2,174
He is 20. Striker long term.
It's the want to challenge to head the ball first, his technique can be worked on once he stops sucking his thumb and "has a go at it!"If he learns how to head the ball he'd stand a chance at making it as a striker.
And yet he has featured in every game we have played. Odd way to hamper a young limited players development.He's a striker, a poacher with a bit of dynamism about him, whose development had been severely hampered.
Age is irrelevant when afforded a 1st XI key member status.People on this forum are stupid. He is 19. He's under pressure to be creating and scoring goals for a defensive side who's coach is known to abandon the attack to its own devices. He was banging in the goals earlier this season - a patch of bad form and you trolls compare him to Welbeck.
Rashford 9 goals and 5 assists, lukaku 14 goals and 4 assists.Age is irrelevant when afforded a 1st XI key member status.
Judge him on his contributions and performances.
No its not. He only has the place because everyone else is too shit to make it thier own. If we had better players he would not be in the team. He is there on merit.Age is irrelevant when afforded a 1st XI key member status.
Judge him on his contributions and performances.
Age is not irrelevant.Age is irrelevant when afforded a 1st XI key member status.
Judge him on his contributions and performances.
Couldn't say it better myself. I heard at half time on the radio how Rashford & martial are wingers (since martial hadnt scored yet) - seems like pace is the only thing needed to be a winger. I'd say both martial & Rashford have everything needed to improve in central positions except possibly heading. Put them out wide they need to learn how to take their man on inside & outside, learn how to cross & even occasionally on both feet, track back, the benefit of hugging the touchline & coming in more centrally etc.Rashford 9 goals and 5 assists, lukaku 14 goals and 4 assists.
I would say his contribution has been on par with those he is fighting for a first place position while not being in his natural role.
We already do, in the performances thread and elsewhere. Usually he gets judged rather harshly, with his actual goals/assists and all round contribution getting ignored often in favour of some imaginary player who isn't in the squad.Age is irrelevant when afforded a 1st XI key member status.
Judge him on his contributions and performances.
Totally agreeHe is only 20 years old. His movement and runs are good. It is totally absurd that people have forgotten the good things he has done and written him off already. Just bonkers.
He's been forced outwide to play a position he isn't exactly suited too. The drop off in performances show this - if given a run upfront I'm sure he'd develop into a class forward.And yet he has featured in every game we have played. Odd way to hamper a young limited players development.
Right now he does not deserve the sqaud status afforded to him.
Fair enough - apologies.We already do, in the performances thread and elsewhere. Usually he gets judged rather harshly, with his actual goals/assists and all round contribution getting ignored often in favour of some imaginary player who isn't in the squad.
This thread is supposed to be about his future.
I agree that our sqaud is not good enough, especially up top - one of the reasons we are so far behind City.Rashford 9 goals and 5 assists, lukaku 14 goals and 4 assists.
I would say his contribution has been on par with those he is fighting for a first place position while not being in his natural role.
But isnt that what lukaku is for? The first choice striker who will allow us to rotate rashford as a backup player while he grows up.I agree that our sqaud is not good enough, especially up top - one of the reasons we are so far behind City.
I don't think the solution is to rely on a 20 year old, rather invest in more developed players already approaching consistency.
Rashford may make but I suspect it will take him at least 2.5 years more before that point, as Mourinho said yesterday, of he makes it at all.
Cole, Yorke, Solskjaer, SheringhamBut isnt that what lukaku is for? The first choice striker who will allow us to rotate rashford as a backup player while he grows up.
We played two strikers at that time and including Ronaldo and Giggs as strikers?Cole, Yorke, Solskjaer, Sheringham
Rooney, Ronaldo, Tevez, Giggs, Berbatov
Lukaku, 36 year old ACL recovering Ibra, Martial, Rashford
No I don’t think the current Rashford deserves the rotation role for a team who wants to be top of the tree. Still way to green and inconsistent.
We played two strikers at that time and including Ronaldo and Giggs as strikers?
Unless we shift to a two man strike force, I dont think we will find players much better than rashford to be the backup striker and I would always opt for developing a young player with potential than having a 27/30 year old on bench who would never be good enough to be your first choice.
Many times, I remember that being one of the few times he actually played as a striker and was ineffective in that game too.Ronnie started as striker many times including his final game for us, the 2009 CL final.
you may opt as you wish and good luck with that. Enjoy not winning the league either!
All our players were totally ineffective that game. Anyways has nothing to do with Rashford and his long term plan.Many times, I remember that being one of the few times he actually played as a striker and was ineffective in that game too.
Does he have the dribbling skills required? Or the creative passing or finding space in between the lines? Not suited to that at all imo.Maybe he could play as a number 10 like Mata or Henrikh ? I'm sure it would be an upgrade...
I think that he's way too greedy of a player to play as a 10.Maybe he could play as a number 10 like Mata or Henrikh ? I'm sure it would be an upgrade...
Yes I'd refuse swapping Rashford for Harry kane when we have that 85 million mascot upfront. Would swap lukaku, personally package & ship him.I don't think his future will be at Old Trafford, but if it is, it'll surely be as a striker. Would 66% of the Cafe still refuse to swap him for Harry Kane.
He reminds me of Welbeck at the moment without the injury proneness. By that I mean the same standard, not exactly the same type of player. At times can look fantastic, but unfortunately not enough of these times happen. I agree with the sending him out on loan to a Watford/Huddersfield type of side, who could offer him first team football, mid table, without having to worry about relegation. This could help him develop, and see if he can become closer to a Kane level of forward than a Welbeck.
My thoughts exactly - if they played in partnership say upfront in a 352; I'd hate to see what they could get up to if they had a 5 game spree of adapting to each other. This coupled with Lingard on current form playing in behind joining the forwards to make a front 3 by running in to space is delicious.I see him and Martial as very similar in that both are effectively strikers that love to drift out wide to the left and attack from that side but in order to be at their best need to play in a front three rather than as one of three behind a main striker or with their back to goal as the furthest man forward.
Not comparing them to him but Thierry Henry was still drifting out to the left and attacking from that side well into his 30’s as he had scary pace and dribbling ability that scared defenders to death when running at them, that’s what I see short term and long term for both Rashford and Martial but I think they’re interchangeable and playing together and swapping positions constantly could be devastating.