bringbackbebe
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2021
- Messages
- 1,708
So a rumour gets out from a shady twitter source and hell breaks lose among posters assuming the worst. What's new?
Hojlund had one of the best goals Vs expected goals ratio when it comes to European strikers, which shows he doesn't need to take random shots in order to score, hence the numbers you are seeing.I think the basic idea is that the ability to get off high volumes of shots is typically a more talent/skill/physicality based one, whereas the ability to get off higher quality shots is one more aligned to improving with experience (as you learn the position better, get into better positions, make better decisions, become more efficient etc.) Also, some players will get different roles as they become more rounded footballers with experience. Think Rooney and Kane, for example.
So if a potentially elite striker at a young age is scoring their goals via high shot volumes, you can predict a fairly clear development path whereby they'll get more efficient with experience but still have a relatively high volume compared to other players as their starting point was so high. Whereas Hojlund is already taking relatively high quality but low volume shots, so we need him to develop the opposite way around.
Here's a graph illustrating it, with the peak for volume being around 22.
Also worth bearing in mind the impact even seemingly small increases in shots make. Give Hojlund an extra shot a game and it's six or seven extra goals across 38 game league season. The difference between a Harvey Barnes and a Mo Salah.
It's not a back muscle injury like Rio.I must admit, back injury does worry me. Rio never really was the same player after his back injuries started. I hope it's nothing serious.
I hope it is as you say. Any reliable info on this issue? Or just speculations at this point?It's not a back muscle injury like Rio.
It's a weak spot in the bone that will heal good-as-new over time.
It's the potential beginnings of a stress fracture, ie. a bone issue:I hope it is as you say. Any reliable info on this issue? Or just speculations at this point?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That's very reassuring and good to hear. He'd be in the squad for monday?It's the potential beginnings of a stress fracture, ie. a bone issue:
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
And it's not a fundamental, ie. neither chronic nor inherent:
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
In other words, there's nothing that will cause a long term problem the way a soft tissue injury would.
Bone injuries often heal stronger than they originally were. In this case, the injury is so minor he can even play once per week. He'd probably be worse off if he caught the flu.
Don't know where you got the bold stat from but Hojlund was 25th for shots per 90 just within Serie A. Or, 62nd percentile more generally. For a striker signed for the fee he has been that's relatively low.Hojlund had one of the best goals Vs expected goals ratio when it comes to European strikers, which shows he doesn't need to take random shots in order to score, hence the numbers you are seeing.
Not every striker is the same, Hojlund has already shown at Atalanta how good he is in possession, he would rather play an extra pass to receive in a better position then take an exploratory shot.
Also the trend for Haaland shots per game is still increasing, he is 23.
Also, only ten players had a higher average of shots per game then Hojlund last season, suggesting his shots tally isn't actually that low.
All players are different, stats need to reflect context for them to be viable.
I think that is an important part of why we decided to sign him: he has been on a continual upward trajectory in his development for the last two years. He scored no goals and started on the bench for Copenhagen in 2021. Then he established himself in Austria and looked good enough to earn a move to Italy the following summer. He was eased into the Atalanta team before the world cup in 2022 but in January 2023 he had really got going (I think 7 or 8 of his league goals came in the last half of the season). I should think United took a good look and decided he would continue taking great strides for a few more seasons (and it seems several other big teams in Europe have the same perspective).Just saw a random clip on SoMe of Højlund being taken out of a cup game for FC Copenhagen against a second tier side having played only 25 minutes after coming on as a sub. This happened less than two years ago.
It really is a meteoric rise from that to signing for Manchester United. He still has to deliver, of course, but that is some development.
I actually meant his expected goals, rather than shots, that's my bad.Don't know where you got the bold stat from but Hojlund was 25th for shots per 90 just within Serie A. Or, 62nd percentile more generally. For a striker signed for the fee he has been that's relatively low.
And I'm not sure what you mean by him having one of the best goals versus expected goals? He's returned 0.44 non penalty goals from 0.47 non-penalty xG per 90 in Serie A, which isn't remarkable in any direction.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Oh what it could have been. Now the poor lad's a paraplegic in a wheelchair, drinking his isotonic drink through a straw.Hojlund had one of the best goals Vs expected goals ratio when it comes to European strikers, which shows he doesn't need to take random shots in order to score, hence the numbers you are seeing.
Not every striker is the same, Hojlund has already shown at Atalanta how good he is in possession, he would rather play an extra pass to receive in a better position then take an exploratory shot.
Also the trend for Haaland shots per game is still increasing, he is 23.
Also, only ten players had a higher average of shots per game then Hojlund last season, suggesting his shots tally isn't actually that low.
All players are different, stats need to reflect context for them to be viable.
Interesting stuff. I think he touches on that himself here:Listening to an episode of the Double Pivot Podcast (an analytics-focused football podcast) about Hojlund from a few months ago where they broke down his stats profile.
They made the point that the typical pattern of development for top strikers is to begin their careers with high shot volumes and for that to almost linearly decline as they get older, with the striker typically getting better quality shots to compensate. So normally you're looking for high shot volumes from a young striker as you know they will likely decrease over time.
Whereas the question mark over Hojlund is that he is currently the opposite of that, a low shot production, high-xG per shot striker. Which means we're essentially betting on his shot volume increasing as he ages, against the normal trend of it decreasing. And while there's nothing to say that can't happen, it means his development path is less predictable than it was for players like Haaland, Kane, etc. because it would be a lot less common. Added to that, Atalanta play an unusual system which requires the striker to behave slightly differently than they would in other teams, so anyone buying him would have to apply good subjective judgment in terms of how his skillset will translate to their team.
However against those two concerns, they thought the rest of his profile was positive as he's generally good at everything else. Passing, dribbling, getting on the ball, actually adding value in general play when on the ball, being a good progressive pass receiver (i.e. a focal point up front), etc. Plus his obvious athleticism.
Comparing him to other strikers, they noted that while his basic underlying stats weren't as impressive as someone like Ferguson's due to being a few years older, he offered a broader range of skills than Ferguson or Balogun. And if someone bought him for what Juve played for Vlahovic (€70m + €10) they'd be a lot more positive about it than they were about Vlahovic, because Vlahovic had a more limited profile and was older at the time.
Injuries are always a bit shit?That’s pretty shit, can’t pretend otherwise.
Can an injury be a win?Injuries are always a bit shit?
His acual npxG per 90 is strong, particularly for a 20 year old.I actually meant his expected goals, rather than shots, that's my bad.
His expected goal return is one of the best, so not sure what you are looking at. His expected goals per 90 is very impressive.
Scored 9 goals from an expected goal return of 9.5, that's damn good.
But the biggest issue with picking up on stats for Hojlund is the very very small sample size.
Stats without context mean very little, and here we have stats being picked upon with little substance or context.
Hojlund would rather not shoot when a pass is the better option, that's been shown in his play so far, yet the stats won't refer to this.
Aye, I heard some other podcast mention that his role for Demark was quite different and more orthodox than his role for Atalanta, so that may well be the case.Interesting stuff. I think he touches on that himself here:
And for what it's worth, according to FBref.com his shots per 90 mins stats are significantly higher for Denmark than in Serie A for Atalanta (3.56 vs 2.65). Obviously it's a tiny sample size and the standard of opposition in his brief national team career has been much lower, but it might suggest that his low-ish shooting volume is partly due to his role in Atalanta's system.
In comparison to whom though? Does every striker show these consistent reduced shot ratios?His acual npxG per 90 is strong, particularly for a 20 year old.
But for him to keep developing from here and score more goals than he currently does, he obviously needs to either a) take more shots, b) take better shots or c) start consistently finishing well above his expected stats. Given what we know about the reliability of finishing over time, we can park option C. And given he's currently 62nd percentile for shots and 95th percentile for npxG/shot, his shot volume is clearly what we would need to see increase.
And generally speaking that development path is less clear than it would be if those percentiles were reverse. Because (as mentioned) the typical pattern for strikers is for their volume to peak early and then decline in a way their shot quality doesn't.
In this case the one season sample size is irrelevant, because they're not saying this is what he is and will forever be. They're saying that this is how his stats profile needs to change over time, whether it be through the effect of increased minutes, change of system or player development. Regardless of why his shot volume stats are low, they still need to get better.
100% it is down to Atalanta's style of play.Interesting stuff. I think he touches on that himself here:
And for what it's worth, according to FBref.com his shots per 90 mins stats are significantly higher for Denmark than in Serie A for Atalanta (3.56 vs 2.65). Obviously it's a tiny sample size and the standard of opposition in his brief national team career has been much lower, but it might suggest that his low-ish shooting volume is partly due to his role in Atalanta's system.
Yes in 2025Antony scored on his debut vs Arsenal last season.... Hojlund to do the same?
His dream should've been not to have a dodgy back.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That coach looks tiny next to him.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date