Replacing Casemiro

I’m surprised there is not more hype around Andre. He looks like an excellent passer of the ball and he is also very good at winning it back. Still just 23.


I’m guessing this stat is all about accuracy. Andre’s FBref profile shows him to be a lower “medium” and “long” range passer but a very accurate one when he does attempt those passes.

Ideally we want someone like that but who attempts more of those passes per game.
 
I think if we get Champs League, we should target Baleba or Wharton. If we just want someone who will be the primary progressor, then we should look at Kroos regen, Angelo Stiller. We are likely to still be able to afford him if we don't make Champions league as he will likely go for 35-40m. However, if we need someone younger who will alternate with Bruno in that position, we should target Ayyoub Boauddi. Part of getting us better as a team and up the league table, we need to bet on talent. The type of talent that we identified in Yoro, that would be Bouaddi. He's had a similar impact as Camavinga when he first burst on the scene in France.
 
We need a midfielder who can do it all, because

our #6(Ugarte) is a limited footballer who doesnt have the playing out ability of a #6, or the physicality of a DM
our #8(Mainoo) doesnt have the passing range or physicality of an #8.

Other options like Bruno, Collyer etc are also similarly limited. This is why I wanted a more well rounded #6 last summer, but oh well, here we are now again, looking for ideally 2 midfielders again.
 
I think we stayed away as we were looking to add height and athleticism to the midfield. Andre would not have helped us in that department especially as we lost McT.
I don't think we stayed away from him due to his height. If height was such a concern in midfield then we wouldn't have signed Ugarte and on top of that he is a limited player in-possession.

It would be ideal if we could bring someone in with height along with ability on the ball. But it's not essential imo and the criteria for me should be to sign a player in midfield who provides the incisive passing along with the ability to win duels on the ground. If he also has duel winning capability in the ait then that's a big bonus but otherwise I think the CBs can step up to challenge for the aerial duel when the opponent launches it long.

For me, we should attempt to bring this midfielder in and push the likes of Sekou Kone to partner in him in a midfield two. Which looks a good plan as far as trying to implement a more dominant brand of football.
 
I don't think we stayed away from him due to his height. If height was such a concern in midfield then we wouldn't have signed Ugarte and on top of that he is a limited player in-possession.

It would be ideal if we could bring someone in with height along with ability on the ball. But it's not essential imo and the criteria for me should be to sign a player in midfield who provides the incisive passing along with the ability to win duels on the ground. If he also has duel winning capability in the ait then that's a big bonus but otherwise I think the CBs can step up to challenge for the aerial duel when the opponent launches it long.

For me, we should attempt to bring this midfielder in and push the likes of Sekou Kone to partner in him in a midfield two. Which looks a good plan as far as trying to implement a more dominant brand of football.
I've seen you mention Kone a few times, how likely do you see him breaking into the first team next season.
 
I've seen you mention Kone a few times, how likely do you see him breaking into the first team next season.
His chances would improve with a proper midfielder next to him who can both defend and pass the ball forward. I think Kone is a very talented midfielder for his age and he's someone who can develop into the deep roaming playmaker that we really do lack in the team with the exception of Kobbie Mainoo. You can never have enough of these types of midfielders and for us to progress as a team we need these players to be prioritised and hence pushed into the team.

So having a player like Kone potentially gives me that hope that he may be able to step up to the first team. Or otherwise I'd be championing the signing of two midfielders just as I did last season.
 
I don't think we stayed away from him due to his height. If height was such a concern in midfield then we wouldn't have signed Ugarte and on top of that he is a limited player in-possession.

It would be ideal if we could bring someone in with height along with ability on the ball. But it's not essential imo and the criteria for me should be to sign a player in midfield who provides the incisive passing along with the ability to win duels on the ground. If he also has duel winning capability in the ait then that's a big bonus but otherwise I think the CBs can step up to challenge for the aerial duel when the opponent launches it long.

For me, we should attempt to bring this midfielder in and push the likes of Sekou Kone to partner in him in a midfield two. Which looks a good plan as far as trying to implement a more dominant brand of football.

At the time, ETH kept on complaining that we had a small midfield and kept on commenting about how Case & McT were the only ones who helped with that. I can see how then they decided to overlook Andre on account of that given that ETH was still coach when Andre moved to Wolves. We have a small team and in the PL, where there are giants in the midfield, we come 2nd best in challenges and duels.

But I agree with you that height is not as important a feature for that area. I would rank athleticism, speed and progressive passing above that. If we are looking for ability on the ball, we should go for Angelo Stiller. I think he is exactly what our team needs and can more than compensate for Ugarte's limited passing. I also like Ayyoub Bouaddi, who would be an excellent partner for Kone or Mainoo.
 
At the time, ETH kept on complaining that we had a small midfield and kept on commenting about how Case & McT were the only ones who helped with that. I can see how then they decided to overlook Andre on account of that given that ETH was still coach when Andre moved to Wolves. We have a small team and in the PL, where there are giants in the midfield, we come 2nd best in challenges and duels.

But I agree with you that height is not as important a feature for that area. I would rank athleticism, speed and progressive passing above that. If we are looking for ability on the ball, we should go for Angelo Stiller. I think he is exactly what our team needs and can more than compensate for Ugarte's limited passing. I also like Ayyoub Bouaddi, who would be an excellent partner for Kone or Mainoo.
I agreed with ten Hag regarding the need for more pace and power in midfield. But that pace and power has to be accompanied by players who can also maintain a level of ball retention along with the ability to pass the ball forward at a good level. It doesn't even have to be a Carrick, Rodri or Kroos but rather players like Henderson and Wilnajdum who were so effective in the Liverpool team where they formed a midfield composition that won all the big trophies. All of our rivals have players who have the ability to at the very least progress the ball forward from deeper midfield. And then those same players also contribute towards creating a strong rest defense where the opponent finds it difficult to transition quickly against them.

If we go by reports, the player they wanted to sign was Amadou Onana to fulfill that role but since INEOS came in with Wilcox, it seems they switched targets and went for Ugarte instead. Wilcox was said to be the one pushing for the signing of Ugarte per reports. I don't think we should accept having a midfielder who needs to be carried on the ball. I think all our players especially in the deeper build up phase need to be contribute in-possession and not limit us on the ball. The teams we want to challenge like City, Arsenal and Liverpool don't have such limited players in midfield. And limiting ourselves like this gives the aforementioned teams the advantage over the course of the season.
 
I agreed with ten Hag regarding the need for more pace and power in midfield. But that pace and power has to be accompanied by players who can also maintain a level of ball retention along with the ability to pass the ball forward at a good level. It doesn't even have to be a Carrick, Rodri or Kroos but rather players like Henderson and Wilnajdum who were so effective in the Liverpool team where they formed a midfield composition that won all the big trophies. All of our rivals have players who have the ability to at the very least progress the ball forward from deeper midfield. And then those same players also contribute towards creating a strong rest defense where the opponent finds it difficult to transition quickly against them.

If we go by reports, the player they wanted to sign was Amadou Onana to fulfill that role but since INEOS came in with Wilcox, it seems they switched targets and went for Ugarte instead. Wilcox was said to be the one pushing for the signing of Ugarte per reports. I don't think we should accept having a midfielder who needs to be carried on the ball. I think all our players especially in the deeper build up phase need to be contribute in-possession and not limit us on the ball. The teams we want to challenge like City, Arsenal and Liverpool don't have such limited players in midfield. And limiting ourselves like this gives the aforementioned teams the advantage over the course of the season.

There seems to be mixed accounts on us wanting Amadou Onana. Apparently SIG, ETH's agency, blocked us moving for Onana for some reason. Obviously could be just rumours but it was very surprising we didn't move for him considering he was the one Everton was most likely to sell and would've immediately improved us. Better player than Ugarte as well, so I don't understand Wilcox preferring Ugarte to Onana. Makes me doubt his eye for talent and understanding what our team needs. Although it wouldn't surprise me if this was a Mendes tranfer triangle, where we had to move for Ugarte to get Yoro. That's how Mendes seems to deal with his clients.
 
There seems to be mixed accounts on us wanting Amadou Onana. Apparently SIG, ETH's agency, blocked us moving for Onana for some reason. Obviously could be just rumours but it was very surprising we didn't move for him considering he was the one Everton was most likely to sell and would've immediately improved us. Better player than Ugarte as well, so I don't understand Wilcox preferring Ugarte to Onana. Makes me doubt his eye for talent and understanding what our team needs. Although it wouldn't surprise me if this was a Mendes tranfer triangle, where we had to move for Ugarte to get Yoro. That's how Mendes seems to deal with his clients.
Yeah you could be right on that, wonder if Luiz is still a loan opportunity because has gone quiet
 
Last edited:
I’m guessing this stat is all about accuracy. Andre’s FBref profile shows him to be a lower “medium” and “long” range passer but a very accurate one when he does attempt those passes.

Ideally we want someone like that but who attempts more of those passes per game.
There are few things worse than a composite statistical measure that is unexplained and used in isolation. I note that Harry Winks is fourth. A player who could not hold down a regular starting spot at Leicester. I quite like Andre though.
 
There are few things worse than a composite statistical measure that is unexplained and used in isolation. I note that Harry Winks is fourth. A player who could not hold down a regular starting spot at Leicester. I quite like Andre though.
Yeah, it’s a very weird specific one - never heard it before. Feels like the original tweet just wanted something to show Andre was top of the table at. As you say — some of the names high up that list don’t strike me as top level passers.
 
I don't think we should accept having a midfielder who needs to be carried on the ball. I think all our players especially in the deeper build up phase need to be contribute in-possession and not limit us on the ball. The teams we want to challenge like City, Arsenal and Liverpool don't have such limited players in midfield. And limiting ourselves like this gives the aforementioned teams the advantage over the course of the season.
Agreed 100%.
 
Yeah you could be right on that, wonder if Luiz is still a loan opportunity because has gone quiet
I think Juventus will probably keep him as they will want a new coach to assess him first. Koopmeiners hasn't been pulling up trees in a Juve Shirt so unless they get a massive bid for Luiz, they will need him as cover at the minimum.
 
IF we were to get into the CL, it might be worth keeping him for his final year

I previously thought we would move him on because of his wages, but given how well he's playing there's no way Amorim will let him go. We may even give him a new one year contract at this rate.
 
I previously thought we would move him on because of his wages, but given how well he's playing there's no way Amorim will let him go. We may even give him a new one year contract at this rate.
Lets hope we are smarter than that. Impulsive reactions for one-off events should hopefully be a thing of the past
 
Lets hope we are smarter than that. Impulsive reactions for one-off events should hopefully be a thing of the past

That would be true if it was a one off event. Amorim has recently come out in multiple pressers, repeatedly lauding Casemiro's run of good form. He's now the nailed on starting CM alongside Ugarte for all meaningful games.
 
I previously thought we would move him on because of his wages, but given how well he's playing there's no way Amorim will let him go. We may even give him a new one year contract at this rate.
Well if done correctly then a new 2 year contract with much lower wage to replace his extortionate current contract could be useful
 
That would be true if it was a one off event. Amorim has recently come out in multiple pressers, repeatedly lauding Casemiro's run of good form. He's now the nailed on starting CM alongside Ugarte for all meaningful games.
Amorim isn't a fool, of course he will appreciate good form and will give playing time to those who are in good form. Not like there is large competiton for places in that area anyways. But going into the future, we shouldn't just look for good form at the end of a season. Casemiro has done well against Athletic. Especially so after they went down to 10 men. He was also important against Lyon, but was also on the pitch when we conceded 4 against them, 2 of them against 10 men.

Isn't the objective to move towards a better kind of football? Why then cling onto players who barely make the drag bearable? What next, when Eriksen and Lindelof end the season on a hattrick and two goal line clearances, do they get new contracts as well?

(intentional hyperbole, I honestly find it suprising, that after witnessing so many costly mistakes over the years, there doesn't seem to be much sensitivity for a repeating pattern)
Useful to keep if we get Champions League.
Nice, lets have him and Maguire as useful players for our CL run then - on a nice 500k per week. Do you think thats the way to get the squad in order and the recruitment right?
 
Amorim isn't a fool, of course he will appreciate good form and give players time that are in good form. Not like there is large competiton for places in that area anyways. But going into the future, we shouldn't just look for good form at the end of a season. Casemiro has done well against Athletic. Especially so after they went down to 10 men. He was also important against Lyon, but was also on the pitch when we conceded 4 against them, 2 of them against 10 men. Isn't the objective to move towards a better kind of football? Why then cling onto players who barely make the drag bearable? What next, when Eriksen and Lindelof end the season on a hattrick and two goal line clearances, do they get new contracts as well?

(intentional hyperbole, I honestly find it suprising, that after witnessing so many costly mistakes over the years, there doesn't seem to be much sensitivity for a repeating pattern)

Nice, lets have him and Maguire as useful players for our CL run then - on a nice 500k per week. Do you think thats the way to get the squad in order and the recruitment right?

A one year deal would be an appropriate option. Same as we offered Giggs in the latter years of his career.

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/21627465.amp
 
Amorim isn't a fool, of course he will appreciate good form and give players time that are in good form. Not like there is large competiton for places in that area anyways. But going into the future, we shouldn't just look for good form at the end of a season. Casemiro has done well against Athletic. Especially so after they went down to 10 men. He was also important against Lyon, but was also on the pitch when we conceded 4 against them, 2 of them against 10 men. Isn't the objective to move towards a better kind of football? Why then cling onto players who barely make the drag bearable?

Fergie always appreciated having top professionals and winners around the team even into their mid 30’s.
And Cas was great when they had 11 men.

I think we need AT LEAST 2 excellent centre mids if we sell Cas… do you really see us buying that this Summer?

Added to that, Yoro was on the pitch when Lyon scored 4, should we feck him off too?
Whats so funny mate - is a few decent matches towards the end of the season not "one off"?

Not sure you know how to count in fairness.
 
A one year deal would be an appropriate option. Same as we offered Giggs in the latter years of his career.

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/21627465.amp
Giggs played his whole career at United. See your point but don't think the comparison is really apt.

Fergie always appreciated having top professionals and winners around the team even into their mid 30’s.
And Cas was great when they had 11 men.
No doubt. But Fergie was also competing in all comps and was the chipleader able to afford a big squad in most of his time here. That doesn't apply to the same degree anymore. I see your point, experience is important, Casemiros winning mentality surely is as well, but I wouldn't pay as much money for it. Next objective has to be to become a functional team again, winning mentality is important as soon as you play for trophies but I'd say athleticism, football IQ, tactical discipline and above average technique are more feasable and important traits right now.
I think we need AT LEAST 2 excellent centre mids if we sell Cas… do you really see us buying that this Summer?
I also think we need at least two midfielders (with or without Cas), best case scenario both in starting eleven quality. Given the names we are in contact with right I struggle to see us bringing in two, but that certainly wouldn't lead me to stick to Casemiro who is on big wages. There were enough games this season, that showed that his mobility is maybe on the lower end of PL midfielders - sure, we could try to mitigate for that - the question is how are we going to do it? And is this really worth it? I'd rather bring in a younger player, see if he can fight for a place and then after a year or two look to either sell and go for a bigger budget solution or be happy about a new starter or at least rotational player bought as a young player.
Added to that, Yoro was on the pitch when Lyon scored 4, should we feck him off too?
You miss my point. For all the celebrations about the very good results and in part also performances in the last EL games, it isn't as if we played perfect football. Doesn't take anything away from Casemiro and no doubt, his form is on the up and I would play him as well but as soon as this drips into thinking we should extent contracts then my deadwood alarms go off.
Not sure you know how to count in fairness.
Whats the matter with you and getting personal? (rhetorical question, I'd appreciate if you could spare me that stuff. Don't want to produce work for the mods)
 
Last edited:
Giggs played his whole career at United. See your point but don't think the comparison is really apt.

It wouldn’t matter if he was there for 5 or 20 years. The club saw value in extending an experienced player and elected to continue with him.
 
If it was my wallet I would splash even 100M for an ELITE ball carrier rather than a direct replacement attribute for attribute. I dont know who is on the market, where value on the market is and so on but in my view the single most important attribute that I've seen in this years UCL and Europa League has been players that are able to break the lines of the opposition. It frees up so much space for the team and destroys the oppositions plans.

For CM/CDM think of someone like Yaya Toure, he simply could carry the ball 30+ metres and break whatever lines of defense the opposition had setup. Now, he is legendary for a reason. You can't just go and buy a new Yaya with all of his class but I would definitely look for the ball carrying attribute rather than just a good holding midfielder or a good passing midfielder. Less good players with similar style were Matuidi and Ramires.

This attribute isn't necessarily flashy with lots of goals or assists (unless you are Yaya) so I wouldn't say you would have to break the bank either. I'm mainly thinking the progressive carries from central areas would open up the wings and lanes for the CF to run in to.
 
It wouldn’t matter if he was there for 5 or 20 years. The club saw value in extending an experienced player and elected to continue with him.
I kind of doubt it. Giggs is seen as a legend by a lot of United players, I'd say that influenced that decision or the perception certainly. But unable to proof it obviously. Iirc though, I think, the majority of fans were yelling out for midfield improvements back then.
 
”One off” :lol:

I’m with golden here, offer him 2 years on a much more reasonable wage for his age, let him mentor this team.
Yeah moving on our only quality midfielder is a recipe for disaster. Never mind the fact that he is also a top character in a squad lacking such characters.
 
I kind of doubt it. Giggs is seen as a legend by a lot of United players, I'd say that influenced that decision or the perception certainly. But unable to proof it obviously. Iirc though, I think, the majority of fans were yelling out for midfield improvements back then.

Being a legend would be a factor in either case. It’s simply a matter of the manager wanting the players’s experience and influence on the field and in the dressing room.
 
Mateus Fernandes should be very high on our list of potential signings if he can be signed for anything close to what Southampton paid for him which was 15m rising to 20+ add ons. He worked with Amorim at Sporting so he'll know the player well and his individual numbers are fantastic particularly since he's playing in such a poor team.

He's 14th in the premier league for possession won, 11th for tackles. His ball carrying numbers are fantastic too along with dribbling.

Stylistically he looks like a young Bruno Guimaraes so I made a comparison of the two on FBref. You can see it here: https://ibb.co/whmw0dz1

He outperforms him with Carries/take ons and most defensive areas but underperforms him in the attacking aspects. I think most of this can be explained by him doing more defensive work and playing in transitional style since at Southampton they have less possession and lower quality players so he simply has much more defensive opportunities/responsibilities. Likewise Guimaraes outperforming him in most attacking areas can largely be down to playing with much better players like Isak etc, Fernandes is almost equal with him for non penalty XG.

He'd be a superb replacement for Erikson and seems to have the exact profile we need. Very mobile/athletic, a great ball winner and the ability to carry/dribble. He's 92nd percentile for progressive carries and 96th for successful take ones, although this comes with the caveat that he has been used on the wing at times (30% according to Opta) although the other side of that coin is that it makes his defensive numbers much more impressive.
 
I'd probably keep him another year if honest. You need experience in the squad as he's shown the past few months, and he can be used cautiously to keep his freshness while being a very valuable squad player. Amorim has found a good balance and he has his very useful spot there.
 
Mateus Fernandes should be very high on our list of potential signings if he can be signed for anything close to what Southampton paid for him which was 15m rising to 20+ add ons. He worked with Amorim at Sporting so he'll know the player well and his individual numbers are fantastic particularly since he's playing in such a poor team.

He's 14th in the premier league for possession won, 11th for tackles. His ball carrying numbers are fantastic too along with dribbling.

Stylistically he looks like a young Bruno Guimaraes so I made a comparison of the two on FBref. You can see it here: https://ibb.co/whmw0dz1

He outperforms him with Carries/take ons and most defensive areas but underperforms him in the attacking aspects. I think most of this can be explained by him doing more defensive work and playing in transitional style since at Southampton they have less possession and lower quality players so he simply has much more defensive opportunities/responsibilities. Likewise Guimaraes outperforming him in most attacking areas can largely be down to playing with much better players like Isak etc, Fernandes is almost equal with him for non penalty XG.

He'd be a superb replacement for Erikson and seems to have the exact profile we need. Very mobile/athletic, a great ball winner and the ability to carry/dribble. He's 92nd percentile for progressive carries and 96th for successful take ones, although this comes with the caveat that he has been used on the wing at times (30% according to Opta) although the other side of that coin is that it makes his defensive numbers much more impressive.

Great write up. I really like this lad every time I've watched him. One of the stand out players between the bottom 3 teams. Any idea if he has a relegation release clause?
 
I'd probably keep him another year if honest. You need experience in the squad as he's shown the past few months, and he can be used cautiously to keep his freshness while being a very valuable squad player. Amorim has found a good balance and he has his very useful spot there.

I said preseason too to keep him for experience for the younger lads, and I thought he would have his best season for us.

I think he lost his place just due to ten hag system and Ruben wanting energy but when you have top class players you need to find a way just like we had a team around Scholes and Giggs in the later seasons

We need the winning mentality so heads don't drop, casemiro is perhaps 1 of 2 leaders in the squad

I feel we replace Eriksen and get another option in but keep our current midfielders.
 
Last edited:
Mateus Fernandes should be very high on our list of potential signings if he can be signed for anything close to what Southampton paid for him which was 15m rising to 20+ add ons. He worked with Amorim at Sporting so he'll know the player well and his individual numbers are fantastic particularly since he's playing in such a poor team.

He's 14th in the premier league for possession won, 11th for tackles. His ball carrying numbers are fantastic too along with dribbling.

Stylistically he looks like a young Bruno Guimaraes so I made a comparison of the two on FBref. You can see it here: https://ibb.co/whmw0dz1

He outperforms him with Carries/take ons and most defensive areas but underperforms him in the attacking aspects. I think most of this can be explained by him doing more defensive work and playing in transitional style since at Southampton they have less possession and lower quality players so he simply has much more defensive opportunities/responsibilities. Likewise Guimaraes outperforming him in most attacking areas can largely be down to playing with much better players like Isak etc, Fernandes is almost equal with him for non penalty XG.

He'd be a superb replacement for Erikson and seems to have the exact profile we need. Very mobile/athletic, a great ball winner and the ability to carry/dribble. He's 92nd percentile for progressive carries and 96th for successful take ones, although this comes with the caveat that he has been used on the wing at times (30% according to Opta) although the other side of that coin is that it makes his defensive numbers much more impressive.
Fernandes at the right price is an interesting option for sure. However, I still have a feeling Mainoo’s future lies deeper in this system, and we also have Sekou Kone coming through who is a great ball carrier too.

The other option I like is Amadou Kone at Reims who apparently us and Liverpool are tracking. He’s more of a towering DM but has great passing range and for his size is very press resistant. Would be good to either get him in this summer to bed-in for a year whilst Casemiro is still here, or sign him and leave him on loan for another year at Reims.
 
I'd probably keep him another year if honest. You need experience in the squad as he's shown the past few months, and he can be used cautiously to keep his freshness while being a very valuable squad player. Amorim has found a good balance and he has his very useful spot there.
I really like Casemiro and as a player I'd like to keep him another year except.... his wages are insane. Based on his salary alone we should be trying to move him on.
 
Fergie always appreciated having top professionals and winners around the team even into their mid 30’s.
I’m with golden here, offer him 2 years on a much more reasonable wage for his age, let him mentor this team.
Yeah moving on our only quality midfielder is a recipe for disaster. Never mind the fact that he is also a top character in a squad lacking such characters.

I doubt Ferguson was keeping around old players on 300k a week, when the club is skint.

I find it hard to buy into this idea that having a player around just because he's old is of significant value in itself. Casemiro's experience hasn't stopped us becoming a lower half side, effectively two seasons in a row since 8th flattered us massively last season. Casemiro's positive dressing room influence hasn't prevented us from sitting 15th in the PL table. If Casemiro can't "mentor" the team to even a top half finish now why would he be able to next season or the season after?

If you're keeping an old player around, do it because he's still a significant asset on the pitch. "Experience" and "character" by itself is completely overstated.

Ferguson also become way too sentimental, Gary Neville had to retire himself mid-season because he realised himself he was costing the team he was so bad, and Ferguson still wanted him to continue.


Frankly I'm baffled by the amount of fans I see wanting to keep so much of this squad together, as if we're not a lower half team with this current set of players. We have fans clamouring over themselves to offer Maguire and Casemiro contract extensions, it's crazy.

It may or may not make sense to keep Casemiro, it completely depends on who we could realistically replace him with, how much money we have, whether we sell well etc. so I'll have to trust the club have their reasons no matter which way they go.


My main concern with keeping Casemiro around is Amorim has admitted he's had to change his tactics just to suit a player who can't run like he wants. "We understood that he cannot jump all the time pressing high. Sometimes it's better to put 3 defenders and to let him be the 4th defender, and put the wing backs pressing high".

This was a theme of Ole and ETH reigns that the squad couldn't play the way they wanted so they ended up abandoning their plans and just adapt adapt adapt, and ultimately both failed to get the team to the level we needed. This club is in a constant state of compensating - trying to compensate for players with no pace, compensate for players who are past their prime, compensate for players who can't run, compensate for centre backs who can't compete in the air. I fear until we stop purposely hamstringing ourselves with this mentality we're going nowhere.

You may have to adapt in the very short term. But the goal surely has to be as soon as possible, get rid of the players not suited to your preferred way of playing. Amorim very clearly wants players who are in their physical prime who can run.
 
I kind of doubt it. Giggs is seen as a legend by a lot of United players, I'd say that influenced that decision or the perception certainly. But unable to proof it obviously. Iirc though, I think, the majority of fans were yelling out for midfield improvements back then.
Fergie shipped out more than a few players regarded as legends by United fans over the years, if he thought Giggs was useful to have around then that's the only reason he was given a contract, being a legend in the fans eyes wouldn't have mattered