I asked if there were any quotes saying only Ukrainians would benefit from his money. If you have those I'd be interested. I don't need to be linked the statement where he said "all victims of the war".
The precise wording in the statement makes it incredibly obvious, doesn't it?
You claimed RA said in his statement something he didn't in fact say. So obviously, you
do need to be linked the statement where he said "all victims of the war", because that is not an identical statement to "victims on both sides of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine ".
The reason for this is, of course, that it is highly debatable whether there can be said to be any victims of that war on the Russian side. The only Russians present in the war zone are Russian troops, or personnel otherwise engaged in supporting the Russian war effort. It would be a highly original and unusual, not to say bizarre, understanding of the concept to regard these as "victims". They are the reason there
are any victims. While the "all" adds an ambiguity to the statement that sceptics about RAs intentions could justifiably note, it would be ridiculous to understand this as a clear statement of intent that money would go to Russians as well as Ukrainians.
And everyone understands that if RA had been understood to mean that at the time, he would have faced a huge backlash. If you seriously imagine he gets off that hook because he was careful to word things ambiguously in his original press statement, good luck with that.