Ron Atkinson - success or failure

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
127,891
Location
Dublin, Ireland
seeing as Freds thread has run out of steam..

Was Ron Atkinson a successful manager for Manchester United?


In my opinion this is not a straightforward question. To answer it, you must evaluate the background of the club at that time and of the man in question himself.

Being the era that I grew up with (born 74 but started following footy early 80's), for me the ‘Atkinson’ years have always been interesting. A time when the two clubs from Merseyside were dominant in the league; Liverpool and Everton. A few years previously Nottingham Forest had picked up the European cup, and in 1981-82 Aston Villa had won the same competition. This was clearly a time when English sides could have an impact on Europe; but first Atkinson would have to fashion a side that could break that Merseyside dominance.

But, was the man himself strong enough to lead the club? To quote the man himself “Not for a single moment did I think of myself as a United manager destined to be in control for ten years, 20 years or even life. Nor did I ever want to. I had other plans, different ambitions” (thanks to ‘We are the Famous Man United by Andy Mitten)

Could one ever imagine the likes of Alex Ferguson or indeed Roy Keane uttering those words? Does it instil confidence?

At one time he had even encouraged approaches from Barcelona “Shortly after we knocked Barcelona out of the Cup Winners Cup, the feelers started to come my way from Barcelona. My answer, discreetly passed on, was simple. ‘Sure, I’m ready to talk; just name a place’.

So, he was ready to walk out on the club if a better offer came along. To me his appearance and attitude stank of a ‘Big Time Charlie’ out for himself and not the club.

However, to be fair to Atkinson, some of the circumstances were out of his control. For example when the board took the decision to sell Mark Hughes to Barcelona for £2m, Atkinson was told this money would be his for transfer funds. He lined up Terry Butcher for £750k to play alongside McGrath. What a partnership that would have been! He also lined up Kerry Dixon, a quality goal-scorer at the time, to replace Hughes. Neither ended up at Old Trafford, instead the board deciding to use the money to build a new club museum. On top of that some of the older players wanted out. Joe Jordan walked out on day 1 to join Milan.

At the beginning, Atkinson had been thinking big. The players earmarked were all quality players who would have made a difference. A swap deal was setup for Peter Shilton and Trevor Francis with Birtles and Bailey going the other way. It fell through when Atkinson changed his mind about Bailey and then fell out with Clough. Mark Lawrenson was approached but he went to Liverpool instead and became a success. Mickey Thomas who wanted out, was traded to Everton for John Gidman. Frank Stapleton was brought in from Arsenal. Then the big deal, Bryan Robson was brought in from West Brom for a record £1.5 million. A deal which caused Sir Matt Busby to resign from the board in disgust at the size of the fee. The likes of Norman Whiteside and Paul McGrath were brought through from the youth team. Gordon Strachan was brought in to replace fans favourite Ray Wilkins. Overall, Atkinson had a decent record in the transfer market. He spent just over 7 million but recouped 6 million. Sometimes the board let him down for money. Lawrenson, who went to Liverpool was set to sign but United couldn’t release the money on time, likewise for Gary Lineker who went to Everton.

When I look at the team back then, it was a solid side which could have perhaps went the whole way had we had the services of a goalpoacher like Lineker. So for me, the board was as much to blame as Atkinson for our failings. However, the question has to be asked, where they not backing him fully because of the attitude I mentioned earlier?

Under Atkinson there appeared to be so much indiscipline with card schools and heavy drinking. Would the likes of Paul McGrath have sank so low if Alex Ferguson had been his manager when he was younger? Paper headlines such as when Remi Moses battered the face off Jesper Olsen in a training ground incident did not help.

Some weird times under Atkinson such as the time he injured Jonny Sivebeck at Anfield before the match. Getting off the bus, the players had tear gas thrown at them by Liverpool fans. In the confusion Atkinson threw what he thought was one of them against the wall, it turned out to be Sivebeck. (Clayton Blackmore couldn’t play that game because his eyes hurt so much).

During his team at United, the club won 2 FA cups. In 1985 they led the league by 10 points but blew it when Hughes was sold.

So, to answer the question, overall I do believe Atkinson was a short-term success but wasn’t strong enough to rebuild the club after the ailing 70’s. That much was clear, he has even admitted himself he didn’t want to be there long term. Thank God for Alex Ferguson.
 
great post.....brought back loads of memories because it was at this time that i was allowed to go to the matches on my own with my mates for the first time cos up untill then i always had to go with my dad who always had season tickets in the old K stand so we always had to sit down but when i started going with my mates we always went in the stretford end.....much much better atmosphere (although sometimes a little scary for a twelve year old)....great days great times!!
i have great affection for "big Ron".......if we´d of won just one title under him maybe he would of been remembered differently but then also we might not of got Sir Alex
 
Great post Golden. I got ineterested in football and started following United in the early 80's as well, I remember Big Ron with a great deal of affection for the signings that he made, and the ones he couldn't make due to the board. We just didn't have the spending power of the other big clubs at the time. Injuries to key players also played their part in particular Robbo at some key times in Big Ron's reign. I think that given more funds Big Ron could have achieved more, how much more we'll never know.

I agree that the discipline was poor, it's difficult to gauge how much effect it had, although undoubtedly some effect. I read Paul McGrath's autobiography and I'm of the opinion that he was beyond help, and was producing the goods on the pitch. Even Fergie couldn't change McGrath, who went on to get PFA Player of The Year for his first season at Villa, the difference between Big Ron and Fergie is that Fergie wouldn't tolerate the behaviour regardless of the performances as it set a bad example to the youngsters and undermimed his authority.
 
So, to answer the question, overall I do believe Atkinson was a short-term success but wasn’t strong enough to rebuild the club after the ailing 70’s. That much was clear, he has even admitted himself he didn’t want to be there long term. Thank God for Alex Ferguson.


good post that GB, enjoyed reading it

we were under a lot of pressure back then to win the title, it had been 16 or 17 years since our last success and Big Ron was never going to shake that particular monkey off his back which was his ultimate downfall

he was likeable though, had the team play the United way, won us a couple of FA cups and signed one Bryan Robson
 
Good post that, Geebs. You'd have to say his tenure wasn't a successful one, but call me strange, I loved it. In fact I'd go as far as saying I enjoyed it more than the 90's. I think that's to do with the fact it was the era in which I really fell in love with United. . .and we all have a habit of looking back through rose tinted specs. He had some decent players, it's a shame he couldn't instil some professionalism in at Old Trafford. He encouraged the drinking culture. . .and only Robbo could drink a skinfull the day before a game and still perform. The reason why he let Sparky go was down to the fact he didn't fit in(he was a shy lad and not a pisshead like the rest of them). Ron said so himself.
 
It's true, Geebs. I heard him say it in an interview and I must admit, I was flabbergasted.
 
im bit confused by that, apparently Ron is too because in the book interview i read with him he said that the board made the decision to sell Hughes
 
im bit confused by that, apparently Ron is too because in the book interview i read with him he said that the board made the decision to sell Hughes

Well, he's not telling the truth then. I heard this interview more than a decade ago. Plus, in them days managers had almost total control over transfers. They really did manage the club.
 
I loved Big Ron, and was gutted when he got the bullet...

It took me a long time to warm to Ferguson.

I wouldn't swap the big Ron era for anything, I loved it, but it probably has a lot to do with how great it was to watch football then, combined with standing on a noisy terrace with great vocal fans.

The romance of the Ron years was special, but I am definitely looking back through rose tinted glasses...

Great thread GB.
 
whatever your feelings about him though i think we all agree that the 80´s was a great time to go watch united....best atmosphere,most fun and we really didnt care that much about winning and also with no disrepect to the fans these days it was really only mancunian accents and mancunian wit you heard back then......dare i say......how it should be!!
 
Good post that, Geebs. You'd have to say his tenure wasn't a successful one, but call me strange, I loved it. In fact I'd go as far as saying I enjoyed it more than the 90's. I think that's to do with the fact it was the era in which I really fell in love with United. . .and we all have a habit of looking back through rose tinted specs. He had some decent players, it's a shame he couldn't instil some professionalism in at Old Trafford. He encouraged the drinking culture. . .and only Robbo could drink a skinfull the day before a game and still perform. The reason why he let Sparky go was down to the fact he didn't fit in(he was a shy lad and not a pisshead like the rest of them). Ron said so himself.
Thats saved me typing.... Dito
 
My feelings are pretty much covered by the first few replies in this thread, I started going at the back end of the Atkinson era and it was a time when going to the match really meant something.

Big Ron I suppose was a failure though , he didn't break the Merseyside monopoly which was his ultimate objective but I'll tell you what, I wouldn't swap the 2 FA cups, signing Bryan Robson on the pitch, Whiteside, scousebusting in the 85 semis for anything. He left the club in a bit of a state by all accounts but I'll always remember the fat scouse bastard fondly.;)
 
the key question is lads, was he in your opinion a success or a failure?

We're mainly sitting on the fence, including yourself in your final sentence of the opening post. Great times, great football at times, little money, and bar has been raised since Big Ron left. I personally think he was a success in may ways, just not successful enough.
 
While I agree with much of the original post.... there a few errors and I think you should look at the wider picture......

Firstly McGrath didn't come through our Youth system and Hughes was not sold because he was shy and didn't like a drink. In fact, Sparky used to drink loads when he was first at United but cut it out later on.......it was a board selling decision to cash in on a player who had cost nothing.....however Atkinson didn't do that much to stop him.

When Atkinson took over he was told to play the United way so he bought flair players....almost to counteract the Sexton regime.

On the plus side:

1. Good open football with two wingers on show most of the time
2. We could beat anyone on our day, Liverpool included
3. His signings in the transfer market were relatively good ones (Robson, Moses, Olsen, Strachan, Stapleton and Muhren were all good ball players in the United mould, although some went missing on occasions)
4. Two FA Cup Finals and a League Cup Final
5. Charity Shield appearances

On the negative side:

1. He completely dismantled our youth system and was very fortunate with the crop of players he inherited. We had one of our poorest records of youth development under Atkinson. I heard he never went to watch the reserves or third teams.
2. He had favourites and gave preference
3. He was a poor disciplinarian
4. He could have persuaded Hughes/Wilkins etc to stay if he wanted but was not strong enough with the board (if you can stand up to them for Robson...why not others). I can't imagine Fergie being 'told' to sell anyone he wanted to keep!!!
5. Defensively United were very poor
6. Robson was so often on his own with only Whiteside wanting the physical battle. Other players were very 'soft' and went missing......I'm convinced this cost us the league on at least one opportunity
7. Some of the football played in his final term was just as bad as that played under Sexton.
8. Many newly bought players commented how easy the traning was at United

So overall, I would say that Atkinson was a failure in United terms but did enough to give himself some time to do better (winning two Cups).....something he failed to do when he lost the dressing room discipline.

Three things that Fergie did when he arrived was

1. Overhaul the Youth system
2. Get the players extremely fit and instil some discipline
3. Bought some fighters....Anderson, Bruce, Hughes
 
you're right off course, we bought McGrath from St Pats for a nominal fee

what you say is the same as what Atkinson said in the book i read - that the board told him to sell Hughes. Spoony reckons he heard an interview saying about the drinking though.

I agree with the rest of your post
 
agree with mr mujac's excellent post above but do remember the Atkinson years with fondness, Big Ron was a popular manager at the time and I felt was well liked by the fans, there was a lot of media pressure at the time regarding us not having won the league in so long ( bit like the scousers today) and fortunately in hindsight he never delivered and Alex Ferguson was handed the baton.............
 
He was great in front of the cameras. Popular with the Stretty End faithful. But he left the club in a worse state then before he came. Lack of vision, bad tactician and a poor disciplinarian.
 
It would have been interesting to see what Sexton would have done if he had been given longer in the post.

His buying was very poor...McQueen, Thomas, Jordan and Birtles were just not United quality albeit popular with the OT faithful.....

Whereas Wilkins and Moran were much better in terms of United style!

However he was developing the kids of 1982 - Whiteside, Hughes, Blackmore, Garton, Hogg, Wood and Pears - he also brought Duxbury and Bailey through the system.....so his youth record was very good and perhaps if he had a another year or two things may have worked differently for him.

Unfortunately the football was so bad at the time that the supporters had seen enough...........

Arriverderci Dave and Caio Ron!!!
 
Good posts from GB (also on Gazza) and Mr MUJAC. Thanks. Some of that stuff I didn't know, like Busby resigning over Robson.

I'd vote Big Ron as a failure with some redeeming features. The football was entertaining and we won some important games but were never consistent like Fergie's teams. Manchester United are a big enough club to expect a manager to do much better. I wondered at the time why Villa were winning the league and European cup and not us.
 
He managed Robson, McGrath and Whiteside terribly. Not only were at least one of them full-blown alcoholics, all three suffered terribly with injuries as a result of their drinking habits from not training properly or living the right way that led to one of them effectively being a has-been at the age of 22 and the other two not fulfill their potential. What if Robson had of been fit for the full season in a handful of seasons in the mid-late eighties? OK, we might not have won the league but we would have finished higher than tenth and thirteenth like we were doing. OK, he bought Robson but someone would have done, he wasn't exactly a secret talent. Robson went on to be England captain and win four FA Cups, two league titles, the Cup Winners Cup etc but he could have been more if he stayed off the drink under Atkinson.
He wasn't a good United manager in my opinion.
 
the key question is lads, was he in your opinion a success or a failure?

Utter failure given the players that he had and the unproffesional way he encouraged people to piss their career away. I was very happy when he was sacked.
 
It would have been interesting to see what Sexton would have done if he had been given longer in the post.

Sent even more of us to sleep?

His buying was very poor...McQueen, Thomas, Jordan and Birtles were just not United quality albeit popular with the OT faithful.....

McQueen was a very good CB and Jordan was a very effective traditional centre forward and Birtles would have been bought by many managers except United outbid them. Few could have predicted how shit he would turn out.
 
While I agree with much of the original post.... there a few errors and I think you should look at the wider picture......

Firstly McGrath didn't come through our Youth system and Hughes was not sold because he was shy and didn't like a drink. In fact, Sparky used to drink loads when he was first at United but cut it out later on.......it was a board selling decision to cash in on a player who had cost nothing.....however Atkinson didn't do that much to stop him.

When Atkinson took over he was told to play the United way so he bought flair players....almost to counteract the Sexton regime.

On the plus side:

1. Good open football with two wingers on show most of the time
2. We could beat anyone on our day, Liverpool included
3. His signings in the transfer market were relatively good ones (Robson, Moses, Olsen, Strachan, Stapleton and Muhren were all good ball players in the United mould, although some went missing on occasions)
4. Two FA Cup Finals and a League Cup Final
5. Charity Shield appearances

On the negative side:

1. He completely dismantled our youth system and was very fortunate with the crop of players he inherited. We had one of our poorest records of youth development under Atkinson. I heard he never went to watch the reserves or third teams.
2. He had favourites and gave preference
3. He was a poor disciplinarian
4. He could have persuaded Hughes/Wilkins etc to stay if he wanted but was not strong enough with the board (if you can stand up to them for Robson...why not others). I can't imagine Fergie being 'told' to sell anyone he wanted to keep!!!
5. Defensively United were very poor
6. Robson was so often on his own with only Whiteside wanting the physical battle. Other players were very 'soft' and went missing......I'm convinced this cost us the league on at least one opportunity
7. Some of the football played in his final term was just as bad as that played under Sexton.
8. Many newly bought players commented how easy the traning was at United

So overall, I would say that Atkinson was a failure in United terms but did enough to give himself some time to do better (winning two Cups).....something he failed to do when he lost the dressing room discipline.

Three things that Fergie did when he arrived was

1. Overhaul the Youth system
2. Get the players extremely fit and instil some discipline
3. Bought some fighters....Anderson, Bruce, Hughes


Hard to disagree with that. Although I'm glad they didn't give him more time since I didn't liek it when he was appointed and never changed my mind during his tenure. That I just didn't like the bloke didn't help.
 
All I can say is I've been lucky that Fergie came along when I was SIX years old
 
He managed Robson, McGrath and Whiteside terribly. Not only were at least one of them full-blown alcoholics, all three suffered terribly with injuries as a result of their drinking habits from not training properly or living the right way that led to one of them effectively being a has-been at the age of 22 and the other two not fulfill their potential. What if Robson had of been fit for the full season in a handful of seasons in the mid-late eighties? OK, we might not have won the league but we would have finished higher than tenth and thirteenth like we were doing. OK, he bought Robson but someone would have done, he wasn't exactly a secret talent. Robson went on to be England captain and win four FA Cups, two league titles, the Cup Winners Cup etc but he could have been more if he stayed off the drink under Atkinson.
He wasn't a good United manager in my opinion.
You're looking back 20+ years with a 21st century eye. People used to drink more in football and in everyday life (4 or 5 pints of a lunchtime ).
 
Maybe so but Atkinson virtually encouraged it even when it was obviously damaging our team. SAF arrived 20 years ago and didn't encourage it even if he tolerated it from one player who was just too important to offload.
 
You're looking back 20+ years with a 21st century eye. People used to drink more in football and in everyday life (4 or 5 pints of a lunchtime ).

Of course they did, I'm fully aware footballers used to drink, but I bet there weren't too many who drank as much as Whiteside, Robson and McGrath who were as high-profile at a high-profile club as them, the last similar cases being Adams and Merson and that was fifteen years ago mate.
 
Atkinson was a confidence trickster with a deep seated desire to be loved; to be one of the boys.

He represented the gradual improvement of managers that the board hired: starting with the disasterous O'Farrell and Sexton to the gradually improving Doherty to Atkinson and then the Messiah - Ferguson.

A good coach who could have been a great coach had he not lost sight of the fact that football was a sport and not a lad's social club.
 
McQueen was a very good CB and Jordan was a very effective traditional centre forward and Birtles would have been bought by many managers except United outbid them. Few could have predicted how shit he would turn out.

Defensively McQueen was very poor and Martin Buchan made him look better than he really was.......he was great at going forward and scored some belting goals....

Sexton was under pressure for some big name signings and came up with Jordan and McQueen. Jordan was a traditional forward as you say....but had no skill/finesse and his goal scoring rate was very poor.

Neither were United quality when we should have been challenging for the title on a regular basis......after Jimmy Greenhoff and Stuart Pearson started to pick up injuries we should have bought someone like Dalglish, Francis etc

Birtles never looked like a United player....and to think we got rid of Andy Ritchie to get him........:rolleyes:
 
Maybe so but Atkinson virtually encouraged it even when it was obviously damaging our team. SAF arrived 20 years ago and didn't encourage it even if he tolerated it from one player who was just too important to offload.
Well my namesake used to claim that being a top player was all about: "Pissing and shagging it up all night and being fit enough to play a game the next day". Since everybody was at it you weren't disadvantaged. Roy Keane wasn't exactly TT when he arrived and for a few years after. It's really only in the last 10 years that footballers have been looking after the temple that is their body.
 
Of course they did, I'm fully aware footballers used to drink, but I bet there weren't too many who drank as much as Whiteside, Robson and McGrath who were as high-profile at a high-profile club as them, the last similar cases being Adams and Merson and that was fifteen years ago mate.

We all like a drink......but why didn't Wilkins, Moses, Muhren, Bailey, Nicholl, Albiston, Buchan etc etc drink to excess???????

Only certain players took it to an extreme......unfortunately it just happened to be our best three players.......maybe they got together so often because they carried the team virtually every week....

Either way...Atkinson didn't deal with it!!
 
I really miss him from ITV's CL commentry... its just not the same...
 
Great read GB.

I was too young to really appreciate what was happening at United under Big Ron, but he was the manager of the team when I got hooked and the love-affair started.

He had a tough job, not made any easier by the board not backing him 100% with resources. Whether that was because the finances weren't up to scratch, or because they didn't trust him, I don't know. In hindsight, I wouldn't trust Big Ron - shady character.

He wasn't United's first choice to take over from Sexton either, both Bobby Robson and Brian Clough were ahead of him.