RedRocket9908
Full Member
Miguel Delaney reporting Ryan Sessegnon is being lined up by Man Utd as a potential replacement for Sergio Reguilon who has returned to Spurs.
Last edited:
![]()
thought United has broke the deal off with Reguilon?
Not sure why we'd need another player on loan, this seems like trash to me.
Didn't we exercise the break clause we had for Reguilon? Why would we then go after another left back![]()
I don't get why we don't just low ball them for Reguillon ro be honest. He was perfectly fine as a backup/3rd choice + did ok here. Sling them £5m plus some add ons and then just leave it on the table.![]()
thought United has broke the deal off with Reguilon?
Not sure why we'd need another player on loan, this seems like trash to me.
He's never ever fit.
Bentancur blew out his knee, had surgery, then got his ankle done in and has still returned before this guy.
Miguel Delaney repirting Ryan Sessegnon is being lined up by Man Utd as a potential replacement for Sergio Reguilon who has returned to Spurs.
Came on and was well off the pace.Sessegnon randomly popping up on Spurs' bench tonight, 11 months since he last featured.
Didn't we exercise the break clause we had for Reguilon? Why would we then go after another left back![]()
ETH didn't break the loan because we no longer need a LB. He ended the loan because he clearly didn't rate him.
That's doubtful. Malacia will be playing avain before the end of January. The need for Reguliion had simply goneETH didn't break the loan because we no longer need a LB. He ended the loan because he clearly didn't rate him.
ETH didn't break the loan because we no longer need a LB. He ended the loan because he clearly didn't rate him.
That's doubtful. Malacia will be playing avain before the end of January. The need for Reguliion had simply gone
Yeah, was clear he wasn't rated. We barely used him and instead threw Shaw in the deep end when he could/should have been eased in.
ETH didn't break the loan because we no longer need a LB. He ended the loan because he clearly didn't rate him.
In fairness, he had his own fitness issues, which is hardly surprising considering he spent practically the whole of last season hobbled. Sort of covered for an injury plague with the injury-plagued there.
I don't know if I dare say this out loud but I didn't actually think Reguillon was too bad, particularly as a loan signing. What's the general consensus been of him on here?
Choosing Dalot at LB has confused me over the last month or two - and I don't think Shaw has particularly any better than Reguillon when they've both played this season. I thought he was technically sound, quite energetic...and it might be my memory but I don't remember too many defensive blunders in particular. Even if he had made one or two - Shaw has his fair share of those too and he's talked about like he's top notch on here. I think Reguillon and Shaw actually shared similar strengths and weaknesses. But it has genuinely surprised me how ETH overlooked him so often to play a RB at LB.
Reguilon did ok for me as a stop-gap in a team in constant reshuffle. He was better offensively than Dalot on LB, even if the attacking flow with Shaw is much better. Defensively he looked weak. It’s not so much about mistakes as it is about duel strength, wether one-on-one, aearially or shielding crosses/cutbacks. As Dalot better understands Ten Hag’s roles of FB in build-up and transitions, it makes sense to send him back, but he has not made a bad impression on me.
He was only omitted from the match day squad 5 times in 25 games.