g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
His nose is growing the more he is talking there.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Jesus Christ, this guy. He's a fecking moron.
It's a joke. He didn't say that.Jesus Christ, this guy. He's a fecking moron.
Mutiny at Chelsea with Terry was long before pogba came back.
You know what was a funny story at that time? Arsenal being 0-4 up at Newcastle and Newcastle coming back. It was one the first melt downs that ive seen as far as internet goes. Epic times man.Fair play. Couldn't remember. But still that was a funny story.
The fact that someone could believe that it was a real quote speaks volumes of Sourness.It's a joke. He didn't say that.
Jesus Christ, this guy. He's a fecking moron.
Mutiny at Chelsea with Terry was long before pogba came back.
You're right, the best kind of lies are those that are not a million miles from the truth!The fact that someone could believe that it was a real quote speaks volumes of Sourness.
Wasn't Willy warming up even before Kepa had cramp the first time? (Someone on the radio said he was)That it was 'tactical' is pure conjecture, but it seems like necessary conjecture for the outrage to carry on.
No. He was rushing about because he had not been warming up.Wasn't Willy warming up even before Kepa had cramp the first time?
Why would he be warming up if not for a planned sub?
If they were they'd have done something on the pitch. Didn't look like any of the players were backing Sarri.
Fair enough, I missed from ET onwards so didn’t see the incident (sorry to go all Wenger on you)If they were angry with them they would have showed it in the moment. And it seems like Luiz was pleading his case.
I think keepers dive where they think the player will shoot it. For well taken penalties the keeper really doesn't have time to react to the shot. So essentially he is guessing where it is going to go. I'm sure you grow more of an understanding of players you face penalties from daily and can better predict where they are going to shoot slightly better. Don't think players react to keepers tendencies in shootouts as much.Probably, but you could argue it's more valuable for a team who can have someone who'll save more penalties, as opposed to scoring more, if that makes sense? I.e. - in the majority of cases penalties are scored, so it's basically the norm for them to go in anyway, whereas if you've got a keeper who can double the likelihood of saving any given pen, then your chances of winning increase exponentially. I think. Maybe. My maths and logic may be way off there.
No he wasn't, he was rushed out of his tracksuit only after the 'injury'.Wasn't Willy warming up even before Kepa had cramp the first time?
Why would he be warming up if not for a planned sub?
Yes, of course they are, but they're still ultimately responsible for making subs. That's...their job description. Appeal for your cause if you want diplomatically, but the decision is theirs and if you refuse, you're undermining the entire chain of command in regards to how the team works. All managers make mistakes - Fergie sometimes did too, in spite of his obvious genius, but that would've never washed as an excuse to defy him because he was the boss.I don't agree, managers are human beings too and they are capable of making mistakes. I didn't see Caballero being told to get ready if Sarri really wanted to play a different keeper for the PKs, Sarri and his team only told Caballero to get ready after Kepa decided to act as if injured. When Kepa did signal to the dugout that he was okay, the manager should have understood that instead of going ape-shit.
I think he's joking as wellIt's a joke. He didn't say that.
You forgot to mention the most important detail, he was cryingHe sat down in the centre circle and refused to leave for a while after a 2-2 draw at Birmingham in 2008. But that was after the final whistle.
Yeah, I'd largely subscribe to that. For someone taking a penalty it's fairly easy to know where the keeper doesn't want you to put the ball - the least likely places they're going to be able to save them. But as the person taking the penalty the burden is still on them to put the ball there, and doing so isn't always easy. Whereas a keeper may be able to anticipate where a player is likely to then put the ball and react accordingly.I think keepers dive where they think the player will shoot it. For well taken penalties the keeper really doesn't have time to react to the shot. So essentially he is guessing where it is going to go. I'm sure you grow more of an understanding of players you face penalties from daily and can better predict where they are going to shoot slightly better. Don't think players react to keepers tendencies in shootouts as much.
Gallas was so good for us. Everyone talks about the Terry & Carvalho partnership but Gallas was fantastic.You forgot to mention the most important detail, he was crying
Oh yeah, I actually forgot about that!You forgot to mention the most important detail, he was crying
What a terrible rule...This took some digging around but have found the rule.
League cup hand book says substitutions will be made in accordance with Law 3 found in the laws of the game.
Laws of the game and FA rules are here
http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-3---the-players
Under substitutions it states:
So it seams that the Ref couldn't make him leave. Feels like it should be the other way around does it not.
- if a player who is to be replaced refuses to leave, play continues
Ham roll bludTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It says more about the bitterness of those who believe it.The fact that someone could believe that it was a real quote speaks volumes of Sourness.
Which journos are saying that? The only interview I saw from Azpi was him saying he was "I don't know, I was on the side of the pitch".Did Azpilicueta really say "not my problem" post match? Because I have seen it go the rounds on Twitter but, can not find a direct quote. And it would show poor leadership as the captain if he said that.
Thank you it did not seem true which is why I asked.Which journos are saying that? The only interview I saw from Azpi was him saying he was "I don't know, I was on the side of the pitch".
https://www.skysports.com/watch/vid...r-city/11647455/azpi-chelsea-are-inconsistent
Felt a bit sorry for Gallas after that game. He'd witnessed one of his teammates suffer a fecking horrendous, potentially career ending injury. Obviously it's not ideally what you want in a captain but sometimes can get a bit much for people and there's not necessarily any shame in that.Gallas was so good for us. Everyone talks about the Terry & Carvalho partnership but Gallas was fantastic.
Bit of an emotional guy though. Bit of the Sol Campbell about him.
If he played for SAF, SAF would have ordered all the players to take off their boots, then called up every sporting goods store in the Greater Manchester area, had them deliver all the boots, and then thrown every single one at the kid, then terminated his contract on the spot.He’d be sold at 99% of clubs.
But this is Chelsea.
As far as I can see he just said he didn't see what happened because he was on the other side of the pitch so couldn't comment. Then someone on twitter said "Azpilicueta basically just said "it's not my problem"". Which then led to someone else on twitter saying "Azpilicueta literally just said "it's not my problem"".Did Azpilicueta really say "not my problem" post match? Because I have seen it go the rounds on Twitter but, can not find a direct quote. And it would show poor leadership as the captain if he said that.
I’m assuming that rule isn’t applicable if the player in question has a head injury.This took some digging around but have found the rule.
League cup hand book says substitutions will be made in accordance with Law 3 found in the laws of the game.
Laws of the game and FA rules are here
http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-3---the-players
Under substitutions it states:
So it seams that the Ref couldn't make him leave. Feels like it should be the other way around does it not.
- if a player who is to be replaced refuses to leave, play continues