Hot under the collar? Moaning?
I'm simply pointing out the obvious, that with another Doped team with unlimited funds it makes it even harder and let's be honest virtually impossible for any other team to ever hope to break into the top 4. No matter how well they scout, how well they spend or how good their manager is.
The Premier League with the United, Chelsea and City (twice) buy outs among others have shown they don't give a flying feck who buys English clubs.
Not necessarily you in particular, the general sentiment of those that are adverse to this particular transaction within the media and certain fan outlets seems to be to fixate on certain elements of the deal. The ethical considerations seem to elicit passionate responses, anti-competitiveness, all that jazz. Arguments that are fairly redundant when the house is not in order to begin with.
The argument you brought up regarding the top four and potentially 3 places being sealed off is a prime example. That is bad if we wish to protect our own position, but within the context of the wider issue of club ownership, football finances and the overall health of the footballing structure it is just a detail, a symptom, it is not that significant.
The chances for most clubs to do much but survive is already minimal. Of course this makes it harder again, but it is already broken, the competition is already lobsided, footballing economics are a mess, and we have regulations that promote entry into this ecosystem by players such as the Arabs. I don't think regulators can point to the league and say "look at the competition we have" or invoke arguments that didn't seem to be of any concern when we allowed the oil funded clubs to go mad.
I agree they don't care, there are far too many vested interests. But that is the only way it can happen. There has to be admittance that what they have allowed to happen is simply wrong and it has to be built from the ground up. Otherwise, I think they should be accepted under the current system as that would be consistent.