He was our starting striker but shit.He was dead wood though
He needed replacing.
He was our starting striker but shit.He was dead wood though
You saw Phil Jones last night and don't think a CB upgrade was a priority? My man.
I know you're being sarcastic. But for those who genuinely believed that, chance creation has been for a problem for few years now and nothing has changed under new regime. It still looks like 11 individuals on pitch trying to figuring out what to do in attack on the go with no chemistry, no pattern or plan behind it.I personally expected that we would get to see all the chances that Lukaku killed when he was here. I’m still waiting to see those manifest.
People were so caught up and obsessed with Van Djiks impact on Liverpool and the usual defence wins titles bollocks. Klopp was smart enough to actually build an attack of Mane, Salah and Firminho before he went anywhere near Allison or Van Djik.I remember a few people actually saying that
Don't get me wrong, we needed it, but we needed a whole lot more to actually look good.
We must have spent almost 100m on managers since Fergie, yet none of them have bothered or been held accountable for doing there actual job which is to coach the team. It's fecking ridiculous.The warning signs have been there since pre season. We just dont have the creativity or movement in the squad to unlock tight defenses. All the opposition have to do is man mark Pogba and we're screwed.
Luckily Dan James has come into the squad and scored some long range shots which is required for breaking down teams like that. But we're still very short of creativity and our final ball is abysmal, but thats been an issue for a long time now pre Ole.
Yeah, when you watch games you just feel that our players really lack basic intelligence. You see other top teams, especially in the wing play, FBs passes the ball to wide players and then continues the run. Our FBs pass the ball to wide player and then takes a break assuming their work is completed.The warning signs have been there since pre season. We just dont have the creativity or movement in the squad to unlock tight defenses. All the opposition have to do is man mark Pogba and we're screwed.
Luckily Dan James has come into the squad and scored some long range shots which is required for breaking down teams like that. But we're still very short of creativity and our final ball is abysmal, but thats been an issue for a long time now pre Ole.
Yeah exactly. Lots of people kept saying he built from the back, but he didn't at all. Ok, he bought a couple of meh defenders, but he made his attack strong first, and I'm including the fullbacks in that because they certainly aren't at the back on heatmaps.People were so caught up and obsessed with Van Djiks impact on Liverpool and the usual defence wins titles bollocks. Klopp was smart enough to actually build an attack of Mane, Salah and Firminho before he went anywhere near Allison or Van Djik.
It doesn't necessarily matter which part of your team you start building first. Our attack has a lot of potential that could just sort itself out, while our midfield is shit past Pogba and our defence used to be beyond shit. Right back and centerback were without a doubt our 2 most vital positions and we sorted them out. Next is our midfield. Once that all gets sorted, there's a fair chance that Martial and Rashford develop a lot more and with a better base in midfield give us more control in games. Even still, our right wing would be the next issue (provided James/Greenwood don't develop on that side).People were so caught up and obsessed with Van Djiks impact on Liverpool and the usual defence wins titles bollocks. Klopp was smart enough to actually build an attack of Mane, Salah and Firminho before he went anywhere near Allison or Van Djik.
Actually it does, because you need to score goals to actually win games. Doesn't matter where you want to finish in the top 4 - the onus is going to be on you to win games, and you can only do that by putting the ball in the back of the net.It doesn't necessarily matter which part of your team you start building first. Our attack has a lot of potential that could just sort itself out, while our midfield is shit past Pogba and our defence used to be beyond shit. Right back and centerback were without a doubt our 2 most vital positions and we sorted them out. Next is our midfield. Once that all gets sorted, there's a fair chance that Martial and Rashford develop a lot more and with a better base in midfield give us more control in games. Even still, our right wing would be the next issue (provided James/Greenwood don't develop on that side).
It was never going to be sorted in one summer, but I'm delighted with the defence so far and the attack I'm just expecting will improve itself just by experience and players returning from injuries.
Bing bing bing.Like 70% of our problems - comes down to poor coaching, and has done for years.
We need to be far more progressive in our set-up. We don’t have a style, and we don’t have the players good enough to get away with not knowing what we are doing. Said for years, but this whole ‘play without fear’ and ‘we should be attacking teams’ is far, far from good enough. People drool over City or Liverpool’s players, but for me, those teams make all their players look better than they are due to the collective. They create far more chances due to how they set up. We haven’t moved past ‘Rashy and Martial are top young players’ so we just need to ‘give them confidence’. The fact Sterling or Zinchenko get in behind so many times a game is not down to them just being given confidence.
We have been left behind on the touchline for a long time. People don’t realise it, and as a result, we ALWAYS need ‘better players’. However, in a million years we could not have taken City apart the way Norwich did last week. That match was won by their coach. Yet we are still moaning that even Rashford isn’t good enough according to most.
I’ll say this, as it stands, we would need a squad of players about 30% better than City’s players in order to beat them to a league title. Equal talent and they would wipe the floor with us.
We don’t create enough chances because we have average coaching.
Creating chances against a team like Astana is not that impressive. They were really bad.We have had a goal scoring problem for a good 6 years now. I don't understand why it is being put on Ole as the man who cannot get us scoring.
We clearly created enough chances yesterday, the quality up top is just not there.
Look at other teams, how do they break teams down with a low block? they have players who can shoot.
Kane, Son, Aguero, KDB, Mane, Salah, Auba, Lacca.
When these players are on the edge of the box teams are scared. Which player of ours can you say will trouble the keeper on a regular basis? None.
Good post @InvictusWhile we could've/should've scored more goals with a bit of luck, there are lot of deeply rooted blocks in United's path, so there aren't any quick fixes, unfortunately...
- Not much guile or ingenuity on the ball from back to front — people don't realize how big of an issue this really is because even posters on here keep suggesting basic counter-attackers as transfer targets (and those players will fail when the opposition plays with low blocks and a tightly knit/organized defense because they can't just run into open space).
- Bare minimum production from the fullback position (which is the contemporary equivalent of the traditional winger in a lot of ways), so the opposition readily lets us go wide to aim for low-percentage crosses.
- Little to no spark in midfield aside from Pogba (which is why he's targeted) — Giggs, Beckham, Scholes, Keane could decide a game on their own and supported each other, our current group is a faaaaar cry from that so the onus falls entirely on Pogba to weave his magic through the middle...and while he has tremendous qualities, he's not a consummate architect.
- Not a whole lot of synchronous/intelligent movement and triangulation to create passing/scoring opportunities — braindead Zombie Football was an issue even under Fergie.
- Inconsistent goalscorers or players who are not natural finishers in the forward positions, and beyond that — the absence of a Van Nistelrooy, Cole, Van Persie caliber of center forward who is in his prime and can sniff out chances to lead the charge when all else fails.
- Poor execution and decision making (especially in decisive moments) because a lot of the players are young and lack maturity/composure, particularly in tough situations where a battle-hardy veteran is usually more comfortable.
- Below par development of individuals via coaching/training, so there's not much organic growth — almost none of our young Starting XI attackers are categorically better than where they were 2-3 years ago.
- General lethargy. The players often don't have a spring in their step, don't seem 110% committed to blockbuster football, don't pass with enough zip, etc. Not exactly Joga Bonito...
- Poor shooting from distance against teams that sit deep and let us have the ball, even under Fergie we'd sometimes need a Scholes/Cristiano special.
- Long standing profligacy issues from set pieces, which are often the last resort against stubborn teams.
- Systemic problems due to improper coaching by the staff or the players' inability to translate the instructions on the pitch...probably a mix of both because neither aspect is outstanding on its own merit. A good coach/system maximizes the potential of players and ratchets up the production of very good players to world class level, good players to very good level, average to above average etc. United's players haven't had that guiding force blowing wind into their sails on a consistent basis.
True, we obviously need reinforcements in attack at some point.Low block or not, we just don't score a lot.
Are you joking? Apart from injury there have been no change on personnel as well as tactics. In fact, our problem is precisely this! Our tactics has been to counter-attack but counter-attack only. Against Chelsea we were fine but there after we were found out. Against teams parking the bus, we were clueless. From last night we can see a few positive and problems1. limited options for creativity. Other than Pogba who else tries something unexpected? Who puts in passes that trouble defences? We need another central midfielder (ideally 2) who do that.
3. Constant chopping and changing of tactics and players. It takes time to gel. Gomes last night was trying stuff and a lot of it was coming to nothing because some of his team mates didn't really know what he could do and he didn't know what they would do. When playing footy with my mates i knew their traits, there was a fella who'd want it to feet all the time and would hold up the ball, lean on the defender with his weight and look to turn him. There was another fella who'd always goal hang at the LW position, often he'd be the furthest man forward because he was too lazy to track back. Years of playing together i knew these things, so do the rest of us with our mates. It will take a while for this team to get to know that about each other.
What is the point of crossing if everyone in an around the box is static or marked because they are static? Why is everyone marked in the box? Because our build up play is so slow the opposition have time to get themselves into shape. There is no snappy transition of play and that is the role of the midfield, including the 10.Are you joking? Apart from injury there have been no change on personnel as well as tactics. In fact, our problem is precisely this! Our tactics has been to counter-attack but counter-attack only. Against Chelsea we were fine but there after we were found out. Against teams parking the bus, we were clueless. From last night we can see a few positive and problems
1. We dearly miss good cross into the box such as Rojo. The last time I can remember was Nani and CR. So how can you creak down a bus when there is Zero cross on target. WAB and Shaw are improvement over Valencia/Young but their delivery is poor, Dalot is worse.
2. Stop criticising your MF when your #10 is AWOL the best, counter-productive the worse. Take Mata's injury time opportunity to Rashford as example, he could have flick it over the defender 1st time, or should have passed it ASAP, but what did he do, control the ball, run it sideway, think for another 2s, couldn't pass because Rashford was obviously off-side, end of story.
3. Getting rid of Lukaku is a problem, without replacement is a sin. Just look at Rashford's finishing....
Creating chances against a team like Astana is not that impressive. They were really bad.
The reasons as for why we are unable to score goals/create chances is a mixture of two factors:
1. Lack of system/style on how to attack against a balanced defence. Under JM and OGS we have relied on individual moments or coincidences to create chances when we are unable to counter attack. Only player that regularly plays for us that can create chances and pick a pass is PP. And he is either forced to help play out of defence (given his high risk playstyle this is not smart) or is marked and pressed by two players as soon as he gets the ball in the final third.
2. Lack of players with the ability on the ball. Shaw and AWB are fullbacks that offers little going forward, we have a number of players in vital positions that are better when we are not in possession(Shaw, AWB, Lingard, McT), our players average ability to play simple passes are terrible and are among the worst in the league. 2 of our 5 best passers are our central defenders and our worst passers are the fullbacks and our attacking players. And we got only one midfielder that can handle the ball when pressed. I would suggest that a team comprised of our best players under 20 year are better at passing and retaining possession compared to the +20 year old counterparts (Not that the under 20 would win a match between the two teams).
And it is difficult to implement a system on how to play against balanced defences without having players that are better at passing/possession. Untill OGS/coaches improve our players ability on the ball we will continue to rely on counter attacking as a way to create dangerous situations. And given the lack of improvement among our senior players over the last 4-5 seasons i seriously doubt it will happen soon under the current manager coaches.
Precisely - the setup is everything. Our biggest issue is the head in the sand 'United way' mentality - young players, counter attacking players, pacey winger bullshit. Yes we had success with this in the past but once you pull your head up none of the top teams rely so much on the counter and all of them prioritise playing out from the back, controlling possession and moving teams around to create openings. A good team makes their average players look good and their good players look great.Like 70% of our problems - comes down to poor coaching, and has done for years.
We need to be far more progressive in our set-up. We don’t have a style, and we don’t have the players good enough to get away with not knowing what we are doing. Said for years, but this whole ‘play without fear’ and ‘we should be attacking teams’ is far, far from good enough. People drool over City or Liverpool’s players, but for me, those teams make all their players look better than they are due to the collective. They create far more chances due to how they set up. We haven’t moved past ‘Rashy and Martial are top young players’ so we just need to ‘give them confidence’. The fact Sterling or Zinchenko get in behind so many times a game is not down to them just being given confidence.
We have been left behind on the touchline for a long time. People don’t realise it, and as a result, we ALWAYS need ‘better players’. However, in a million years we could not have taken City apart the way Norwich did last week. That match was won by their coach. Yet we are still moaning that even Rashford isn’t good enough according to most.
I’ll say this, as it stands, we would need a squad of players about 30% better than City’s players in order to beat them to a league title. Equal talent and they would wipe the floor with us.
We don’t create enough chances because we have average coaching.
I think if we had scored early we would have sat back and got caught, like always.You can see what we were trying to do tonight for example, start fast and try to blitz a goal in the first 20 minutes. It would have been a completely different game if Rashford for example had taken one of his chances early; it would have opened things up and I would have rated us to get a few more.
Our biggest problem currently is that we don't have a player who you'd bank on when we get these chances early on. We have some good attacking players, but they're far too inconsistent.
He has a 30m release clause apparently. Big United fan too. We've never been linked with him though for some reason.We just don't have a decent striker in our squad. I'd like to see us sign Timo Werner, but that's probably just another pipe dream!
Bars.Like 70% of our problems - comes down to poor coaching, and has done for years.
We need to be far more progressive in our set-up. We don’t have a style, and we don’t have the players good enough to get away with not knowing what we are doing. Said for years, but this whole ‘play without fear’ and ‘we should be attacking teams’ is far, far from good enough. People drool over City or Liverpool’s players, but for me, those teams make all their players look better than they are due to the collective. They create far more chances due to how they set up. We haven’t moved past ‘Rashy and Martial are top young players’ so we just need to ‘give them confidence’. The fact Sterling or Zinchenko get in behind so many times a game is not down to them just being given confidence.
We have been left behind on the touchline for a long time. People don’t realise it, and as a result, we ALWAYS need ‘better players’. However, in a million years we could not have taken City apart the way Norwich did last week. That match was won by their coach. Yet we are still moaning that even Rashford isn’t good enough according to most.
I’ll say this, as it stands, we would need a squad of players about 30% better than City’s players in order to beat them to a league title. Equal talent and they would wipe the floor with us.
We don’t create enough chances because we have average coaching.
Great post. Sums it all up very nicely.While we could've/should've scored more goals with a bit of luck, there are lot of deeply rooted blocks in United's path, so there aren't any quick fixes, unfortunately...
- Not much guile or ingenuity on the ball from back to front — people don't realize how big of an issue this really is because even posters on here keep suggesting basic counter-attackers as transfer targets (and those players will fail when the opposition plays with low blocks and a tightly knit/organized defense because they can't just run into open space).
- Bare minimum production from the fullback position (which is the contemporary equivalent of the traditional winger in a lot of ways), so the opposition readily lets us go wide to aim for low-percentage crosses.
- Little to no spark in midfield aside from Pogba (which is why he's targeted) — Giggs, Beckham, Scholes, Keane could decide a game on their own and supported each other, our current group is a faaaaar cry from that so the onus falls entirely on Pogba to weave his magic through the middle...and while he has tremendous qualities, he's not a consummate architect.
- Not a whole lot of synchronous/intelligent movement and triangulation to create passing/scoring opportunities — braindead Zombie Football was an issue even under Fergie.
- Inconsistent goalscorers or players who are not natural finishers in the forward positions, and beyond that — the absence of a Van Nistelrooy, Cole, Van Persie caliber of center forward who is in his prime and can sniff out chances to lead the charge when all else fails.
- Poor execution and decision making (especially in decisive moments) because a lot of the players are young and lack maturity/composure, particularly in tough situations where a battle-hardy veteran is usually more comfortable.
- Below par development of individuals via coaching/training, so there's not much organic growth — almost none of our young Starting XI attackers are categorically better than where they were 2-3 years ago.
- General lethargy. The players often don't have a spring in their step, don't seem 110% committed to blockbuster football, don't pass with enough zip, etc. Not exactly Joga Bonito...
- Poor shooting from distance against teams that sit deep and let us have the ball, even under Fergie we'd sometimes need a Scholes/Cristiano special.
- Long standing profligacy issues from set pieces, which are often the last resort against stubborn teams.
- Systemic problems due to improper coaching by the staff or the players' inability to translate the instructions on the pitch...probably a mix of both because neither aspect is outstanding on its own merit. A good coach/system maximizes the potential of players and ratchets up the production of very good players to world class level, good players to very good level, average to above average etc. United's players haven't had that guiding force blowing wind into their sails on a consistent basis.
This is a top top post, it's objective in taking away the standard critical emphasis placed on Ole and redirected where it should be, highlighting his influence in what we are seeing on the field. Our coaching staff need to be getting more out of this squad. 80% of our managerial appointments have been astute / decent managers but they've been average at best coaches with LVG being a slight exception as he did improve the most individual players out of Ole, Moyes and Jose.Like 70% of our problems - comes down to poor coaching, and has done for years.
We need to be far more progressive in our set-up. We don’t have a style, and we don’t have the players good enough to get away with not knowing what we are doing. Said for years, but this whole ‘play without fear’ and ‘we should be attacking teams’ is far, far from good enough. People drool over City or Liverpool’s players, but for me, those teams make all their players look better than they are due to the collective. They create far more chances due to how they set up. We haven’t moved past ‘Rashy and Martial are top young players’ so we just need to ‘give them confidence’. The fact Sterling or Zinchenko get in behind so many times a game is not down to them just being given confidence.
We have been left behind on the touchline for a long time. People don’t realise it, and as a result, we ALWAYS need ‘better players’. However, in a million years we could not have taken City apart the way Norwich did last week. That match was won by their coach. Yet we are still moaning that even Rashford isn’t good enough according to most.
I’ll say this, as it stands, we would need a squad of players about 30% better than City’s players in order to beat them to a league title. Equal talent and they would wipe the floor with us.
We don’t create enough chances because we have average coaching.
The reason why our attacking players are so static in the box is simple: we don't have any good crosser that is able to hit a moving target accurately.What is the point of crossing if everyone in an around the box is static or marked because they are static? Why is everyone marked in the box? Because our build up play is so slow the opposition have time to get themselves into shape. There is no snappy transition of play and that is the role of the midfield, including the 10.
Like 70% of our problems - comes down to poor coaching, and has done for years.
We need to be far more progressive in our set-up. We don’t have a style, and we don’t have the players good enough to get away with not knowing what we are doing. Said for years, but this whole ‘play without fear’ and ‘we should be attacking teams’ is far, far from good enough. People drool over City or Liverpool’s players, but for me, those teams make all their players look better than they are due to the collective. They create far more chances due to how they set up. We haven’t moved past ‘Rashy and Martial are top young players’ so we just need to ‘give them confidence’. The fact Sterling or Zinchenko get in behind so many times a game is not down to them just being given confidence.
We have been left behind on the touchline for a long time. People don’t realise it, and as a result, we ALWAYS need ‘better players’. However, in a million years we could not have taken City apart the way Norwich did last week. That match was won by their coach. Yet we are still moaning that even Rashford isn’t good enough according to most.
I’ll say this, as it stands, we would need a squad of players about 30% better than City’s players in order to beat them to a league title. Equal talent and they would wipe the floor with us.
We don’t create enough chances because we have average coaching.
Rashford could certainly be better. But he could also be a lot worse. He’s 21 and for me, the second best young striker in the world after Mbappe.Yep. And with what gets leaked as our potential targets (no idea if they are our actual targets or not), it doesn't look like we will have even equal players for a long time. We are hoping to hit the lottery with our academy, and I just don't think that will be enough.
But, to disagree with you slightly, I still think Rashford needs to be better and even with a magician coach, he would struggle.