If we sign a number 9 he is gone. He should be gone irrespective of that.Unfortunately I think he will be
If we sign a number 9 he is gone. He should be gone irrespective of that.Unfortunately I think he will be
Absolutely, he should be gone even if he scores 100 goals in our last 4 games.If we sign a number 9 he is gone. He should be gone irrespective of that.
I have to ask what you're on about.
Weghorst did start in our last loss, and in the other games, he's been subbed in, while there are other attacking options on the bench e.g. Pellistri - honestly, it's not that hard to understand.
He comes on in a number 10 position and pushes Bruno to the right, correct? Pray tell, what position does Pellistri play?
To spell it out just in case, if Pellistri is subbed in rather than Weghorst, Bruno keeps his place and we have our most creative player in his best position with an actual right winger on the right.
Wout was 6 times second half sub in last 7 games over Pellistri who was next to him on the bench, which means that he is the one literally keeping Pellistri out of the team.
True, but Antony comes off pretty much every game and Pellestri rarely gets on, Sancho is always preferred, I think ETH needs to explain at some point why Pellestri isn't getting a chance because I don't understand why TBHThe only player keeping Pellistri out of the team is Antony
Dont act stupid when you are not. You don't think attacking player coming on when we are chasing/closing the game has anything to do with other attacking player on the bench?You are so right and even worse he is also keeping out Brandon Williams and Jack Butland as well
NagelsmannEth has done a fantastic job in his first season, even if he doesn't make top 4 this season. I've seen worse from top managers at utd post Fergie, who were given more time but failed to deliver and we had to endure boring matches and uninspiring TV interviews. Love his signings and man mgt, think the players love and respect him.
There are still areas I'd love the man to improve, like being ruthless in his decision to let underperforming players leave or not including their names on the match day team sheet.
For all the praise of him being an astute tactician, I really haven't seen much improvement in tactics from Ole's era at utd rather from what I've seen, I think Ole was better tactically in handling opposition teams.
He's not a Fergie or Jose Mourinho, but he should improve his pre and post match interviews especially when the team loses, just look for better excuses after any loss.
I still think he's the right man for the job from glimpses of the already existing team at their best, I can only imagine what he is capable of with a team built in his image.
I'd give him a long time to rebuild and I wonder, if not him who at the moment?
I can only hope that's not true.He absolutely not be sacked for finishing 5th, however, if reports from this morning are true - he should absolutely be sacked if he decides to offer Wout Weghorst a longer term contract. I can’t trust the judgement of a man anymore if he goes down that road.
If this place has no patience for Ten Hag, they'll hate him even more. It's a ridiculous suggestion at this point in time.Nagelsmann
Unfortunately, the board's judgment isn't any better, based on what we've seen so far. They'd happily sign off on it.I can only hope that's not true.
If he somehow wants Weghorst to stay, the board should overrule him and give him absolutely zero authority on deciding what players to bring in.
Then once the new owners come in, they should absolutely bin everyone associated with that decision(if it came to that).Unfortunately, the board's judgment isn't any better, based on what we've seen so far. They'd happily sign off on it.
Good to see you cuntoRidiculous thread but to answer - obviously not. There are players at that club years that have consistently let the club down that need to be f*cked off. Ten Hag needs a few years, like Arteta at Arsenal.
Agreed, but for me personally, I’m not sure that would be the end of it. It is difficult to have confidence in a Manchester United manager that thinks Weghorst is a good player that he wants to use. It then starts calling his other footballing philosophies into question.I can only hope that's not true.
If he somehow wants Weghorst to stay, the board should overrule him and give him absolutely zero authority on deciding what players to bring in.
I'm inclined to agree. It is hard to trust a manager who has faith in Weghorst even after his performances lately.Agreed, but for me personally, I’m not sure that would be the end of it. It is difficult to have confidence in a Manchester United manager that thinks Weghorst is a good player that he wants to use. It then starts calling his other footballing philosophies into question.
That said, I’m in the camp of ‘he can’t possibly think Weghorst is good enough’. Although I do think he did think this in January when he brought him in, but I can excuse that error of judgment, bit can’t excuse still thinking the same after watching what we have watched for 5 months.
Indeed, although he’s generally impressed me and I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt due to not having much to choose from, particularly in attacking areas. However, if in a summer where he gets to continue the construction of his squad he decides voluntarily (for the second time), that he wants Weghorst in it, then it’s not unreasonable to call that into question.I'm inclined to agree. It is hard to trust a manager who has faith in Weghorst even after his performances lately.
Some of Ten Hag's decision making lately has completely perplexed me. I thought he was managing fairly well up to the league cup final. Since then though, he's unfortunately been a disaster with some of his management. I don't understand how he can justify shifting Bruno out wide to then play Weghorst in Bruno's position essentially. It's just indefensible.
We finish the season by losing our next 4 games and then lose in the FA Cup Final?For the people who said no, would the answer be different if he loses out on the champions league by losing each of the next 4 games? Cos for me that probably would swing it
We didn't give him Weghorst.I mean he needed a striker and we gave him Wout even with Martials injury record and CR7 gone. That was diabolical! The glazers fecked us once again. We have one one to score goals and frankly haven’t had a good striker since RVP.
we were unlucky with Case’s two suspensions, Eriksen and Garnachos injuries…
Yeah, if that happened rather than it being say 2 wins and 2 draws and Liverpool win 3 and we miss out on the champions league, if instead we just lose the next 4, would people want ten hag out? Cos at that point I would, I'd be OK for him to go another year in the first scenario but in the second case I'd want him goneWe finish the season by losing our next 4 games and then lose in the FA Cup Final?
That would be a disaster honestly.
You think he would of chose an emergency loan signing if he had the chance to actually buy a proper striker? There was obviously no money available to him so who was he supposed to sign on loan instead of Weghorst?We didn't give him Weghorst.
He wanted him and got him. You think the board scouted and brought in Weghorst?
If Ten Hag signs him on a permanent deal I would seriously question if he's the man to take us forward.Unfortunately I think he will be
I think he needs to go regardless of the top 4 or not. He just does not seem to be the man unfortunately, the sooner we change it the sooner we can find the right man. Lets end this misery. We have not made any progress since Ole was here, and we sacked a club legend for similar results, why should Seven Haag get a longer rope?
They plugged the plug, and won 3 champions league in 3 years. As many as the mighty Man United have won in their whole history. Shows you how we overate ourselves/club and United Way & United DNA.Again, real Madrid got rid of benitez after 6 months, when they were 4 points off the top in la liga and had qualified for the last 16 of the champions league, on here that would decried as rash, stupid, moronic. They then won the next 3 champions leagues
Still no for me unless ETH starts WW in all these games or signs WW permanently.For the people who said no, would the answer be different if he loses out on the champions league by losing each of the next 4 games? Cos for me that probably would swing it
Personally, I’ve got no idea why anyone would want their club to be like 13 times champions league winners Real Madrid. #hollowFFS
‘We’re a clueless club for clueless people… we’ll have no winning here!’
Not Antony as in his performances, but the fact he’s the managers signing and his transfer fee. Anyone else would have been dropped by now, it’s like Maguire under Solskjaer.The only player keeping Pellistri out of the team is Antony