mu4c_20le
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 44,131
Close
Not so much that I have an issue with the rule but visually it looks soft. I don't think that's a reason to scrap the rule but rarely looks outrageous.I don’t think there is anything wrong with the rule. Villa have been doing it all season and somehow getting away with it. It’s abusing the rules
Football is over for everybody, not just me.I’ve noticed decisions going against Liverpool are always extra seismic like decisions as if every club doesn’t have ridiculous decisions go against them.
You're missing a good game.... just turn the sound off !One of the many reasons I’m not watching the game at all.
Watching the rugby. Preferable to watching either Liverpool or Chelsea. I’m done with football this weekend after that diabolical United performance yesterday.You're missing a good game.... just turn the sound off !
I would because offside was clear as day the correct decision.This. Nobody on here would call that a correct decision if it wasn’t against Liverpool, and we all know it.
Which game was that again?It was bullshit when Maguire got done by it, stand by it now
So you think that they should give a pen for him having hold of his shirt, which was absolutely inconsequential to whether or not he scored, because Liverpool also cheated by blocking off the defender?Van Djik isn't touching Chilwell, it's 100% contact from one direction. And Van Djik was still Chilwell's man so that foul was happening regardless of any offside.
Too many young playersChelsea would be better off with Michael Jackson up front.
At Craven Cottage I think.Which game was that again?
It really isn't. That's a poor match. I switched over at half time.Watching the rugby. Preferable to watching either Liverpool or Chelsea. I’m done with football this weekend after that diabolical United performance yesterday.
Chelsea would be better off with Michael Jackson up front.
Too many young players
Chelsea would be better off with Michael Jackson up front.