Books The BOOK thread

I just read a book called I am Pilgrim by Terry Hayes.



It was a bit of a tome over 900 pages I think, but the writing in it is sensational, the back story for the character The Saracen is some of the best I've ever read and then the main character is an excellently flawed protagonist with a very good back story himself.



Proper 10 out 10 book it's been around for a while now but I'd only picked it up recently, would make an excellent series
 
I.N.L.A. Deadly Divisions

The story of the history of the leftist terrorist group that emerged from the split with the Official IRA in 1974.

The book is a triumph of investigative journalism. The authors reveal information that comes straight from the horse's mouth and, as a result, we're able to understand the machinations of the organisation that most of us only really heard about when they committed violent acts.

The book is well-written, engaging, and also offers the authors' own criticism of the decisions and actions taken by the INLA and its political wing, the IRSP. In many ways, the IRSP were ahead of the curve, in terms of their political ideas and actions (for example, they led the charge when it came to the rights of republicans to identify as political prisoners, which led to the 1981 Hunger Strikes, whereas the Provos were very reluctant to get involved), but they never seemed to reap the benefits. A lack of money, support on the ground, and constant infighting, ultimately led to acrimonious splits and bloody feuds.

The book details the many internecine battles between rival factions, beginning with the formation of the IRSP/INLA after the Official IRA's ceasefire, through the fallout after Dominic 'Mad Dog' McGlinchey's one-man dictatorship, and the feud between the INLA and IPLO. On each occasion, former friends and comrades hunted each other down, leaving the communities they came from gripped with fear.

What I found most interesting, were the 'coms', smuggled out of prison, between Gerard 'Dr Death' Steenson and Harry Flynn (a man Steenson had tried to kill 4 years earlier). Steenson's reputation in West Belfast - and in popular mythology - is that of a cold-blooded assassin. He shot dead Billy McKillen, the leader of the Official IRA in Belfast, during a feud with the INLA, when he was just 16 years old. However, the coms paint a picture of a very intelligent, very shrewd political thinker, many of whom's predictions were to come true. Ultimately, though, like so many leading characters in the book, he dies at the hands of his former allies.

It's a really excellent book. It's the only one that deals with the INLA in its entirety and, in some ways, it's written almost like a thriller. At almost 500 pages, the fact that I read it in less than a week is testament to how good it is. Highly recommended.

("The Lost Revolution" is an equally good book detailing the history of the Official IRA).
 
I've been in a reading slump this year. The last book I read was in 2024. Could do with some recommendations, preferably a nice and easy read to get me back into the flow of things.
 
I've been in a reading slump this year. The last book I read was in 2024. Could do with some recommendations, preferably a nice and easy read to get me back into the flow of things.
Project Hail Mary, by the guy who wrote The Martian, it's a fun read. Can probably get it second hand for a few quid.
 
Started McCarthy’s The Road last night. About 80 pages in and it’s gripping as feck. Something about this author’s prose just draws you in deeper and deeper.
 
Started McCarthy’s The Road last night. About 80 pages in and it’s gripping as feck. Something about this author’s prose just draws you in deeper and deeper.
Ah man to experience the Road again for the first time.

For anyone who might be interested, a graphic novel adaptation of the Road was released last year. It's a very different experience obviously, but beautifully illustrated.
 
I've been in a mega slump this year when it comes to reading, but newborn babies will do that I guess. I stupidly started The Obscene Bird of Night by Jose Donoso a few weeks before the due date, and it can be weeks between chapters. Not ideal because it's confusing as feck (but excellent all the same).
 
The Committee: Political Assassination in Northern Ireland

This book was banned in the UK (don't know if it still is), and concerns the findings of an independent television production company who investigated claims of collusion in Northern Ireland. They uncovered a conspiracy, involving loyalist terrorists, politicians, security forces and businessmen, which directed a campaign of violence towards members of the Catholic/Nationalist/Republican community.

The Committee in question, the Ulster Loyalist Central Co-ordinating Committee, was chaired by Billy Abernethy, who was a chief executive in the Ulster Bank, as well as being a former RUC reservist. He was joined by notorious loyalist killers, Robin 'The Jackal' Jackson and Billy Wright (aka King Rat), the former head of RUC Special Branch, Trevor Forbes, Reverend Hugh Ross (head of the Ulster Independence Movement), and Nelson McCausland (DUP politician), among others.

They are alleged to have met at regular intervals to discuss the direction of loyalist terror. An insider stated that the Committee's main aim was the killing of republicans, but they also sanctioned the murder of innocent Catholics when it was convenient. The targets were selected at these meetings, with the actual logistics of assassinations being left to the likes of Jackson and Wright to hammer out with the RUC's 'Inner Force' - disaffected members of the police service who ensured safe passage and a clean getaway for the gunmen.

It all reads like fantasy for most people who aren't from Northern Ireland and didn't experience the Troubles. That the police colluded with sectarian killers and 'respectable' members of society, to plot the deaths of innocent people, is just too outlandish to even contemplate. After all, the majority of the evidence of this Committee hails from one man - Jim Sands. A self-confessed member of the Committee, he later recanted his story and claimed that the programme makers encouraged and led him into the allegations he made. However, when you know for a fact that collusion between loyalist killers and security forces definitely happened in other cases, it doesn't seem so far-fetched. I'll leave it to you to make up your own mind.

Here is an online copy of the book

Below is the original Dispatches programme.

 
Started McCarthy’s The Road last night. About 80 pages in and it’s gripping as feck. Something about this author’s prose just draws you in deeper and deeper.
Are you considering watching the film adaptation afterwards? It's very good.
 
I just read a book called I am Pilgrim by Terry Hayes.



It was a bit of a tome over 900 pages I think, but the writing in it is sensational, the back story for the character The Saracen is some of the best I've ever read and then the main character is an excellently flawed protagonist with a very good back story himself.



Proper 10 out 10 book it's been around for a while now but I'd only picked it up recently, would make an excellent series

Absolutely amazing, possibly the most captivating book I've ever read. Could not put it down.

It's such a contrast to his second book.
 
Heaven and Hell: A History of the Afterlife - Bart D. Ehrman

The renowned New Testament scholar looks at the origins of the idea of Heaven and Hell, from the ancient Greek philosophers and the Jewish authors of the Old Testament, to the teachings of Jesus himself and, finally, the Christian theologians who followed.

It's a fascinating book, really easy to read and understand, with Ehrman carefully teasing out subtexts and hidden meanings from the literal words.

He discusses the ancient Greek belief in the soul, which is connected to the body while the person is alive, and which lives on after death. Writers like Homer believed it was a 'finer' (my word) version of the body, almost ghost-like, but enabling the dead person to still experience all of their senses. After death, the soul resided in Hades, which was kind of bleak and boring, but wasn't suffering eternal torment.

Later Greek thinkers, such as Plato, grappled with the notion of divine judgement, with justice being meted out depending whether a person had been good or bad during their life. For him, the soul was eternal. But others, such as Epicurus, despite subscribing to the notion of the soul, thought that it dissolved upon death, and that there was no continuity of consciousness when a person died.

The Jews of the Old Testament era, initially having an Epicurean kind of stance on the afterlife ('Sheol' is often cited as the Hebrew version of the Underworld, but it is also used frequently as the word for a grave or a pit; either way, it was not a place of eternal damnation), are greatly influenced by Greek culture later on (after all, Alexander the Great conquered the known world).

In fact, by the time of Jesus, there isn't a Jewish consensus on the afterlife or the soul: the Pharisees believed in the resurrection of the dead and some form of afterlife with rewards and punishments; the Sadducees generally rejected the idea of resurrection and the immortality of the soul, focusing on the here and now; and the Essenes, according to the historian Josephus, held a more Greek view, believing in the immortality of the soul which would be liberated from the body at death.

Jesus himself preached that his kingdom was earthly and was imminent (he told his disciples that he would return before some of them had died). He didn't talk about disembodied souls rising up to Heaven; rather, believers would rise from the dead and join him in Paradise on Earth. Non-believers and the wicked would be obliterated (ie: cease to exist).

The gospel writers, 2-3 generations after Jesus's death, and dealing with the fact that he hadn't actually returned, were faced with a dilemma, and moved the goalposts somewhat. To a greater or lesser extent, they still ascribed to an Earthly Kingdom which Jesus would rule over, but their different takes on Jesus's life and teachings paved the way for early church leaders and thinkers to put words in Jesus's mouth that he didn't say.

These people develop ideas of the afterlife that contradicted those of Jesus, and it's their teachings, not his, which carried over to the present day. It was they who posited the notion of Heaven being a place of eternal bliss and Hell as a place of everlasting torment.

I could go on. For example, Ehrman talks about early Christian martyrs willingly dying in the most horrific ways in order to mimic the suffering Jesus went through on the cross. And he expounds upon early Christian thinkers' concepts of Heaven and Hell as having different 'levels' or 'areas' where different things were happening to souls depending on how they lived on Earth, which influenced the likes of Dante more than a thousand years later. All the while, he makes it accessible and entertaining (if that's the right word?)

Anyway, in summary, it really is a great book and I highly recommend it.
 
History of the People of England vol 3 (1689-1834) - Alice Greenwood

I bought this trilogy last year from Ebay, but the seller had somehow lost or sold the other two volumes, so kindly gave me this one for free. English history is a big gap in my knowledge, as I've always been more interested in events in Europe (French Revolution is my specialty), so I thought it was time to right that wrong.

This book is absolutely fantastic. It reminded me so much of school, as this is the kind of text we read, and it really is of its time. Published in 1926, there's some wonderfully anachronistic ideas and turns of phrase. For example, the Irish are described as having: "... the peculiar faculty for maintaining two opposed and mutually destructive arguments at once." Furthermore, the apprenticeship system is lauded because: "it really taught the children to earn their living."

The book covers the change from monarchy to parliamentary democracy, and the transformation from an agrarian to an early industrial society, all against the backdrop of the various conflicts and alliances that England was involved in. I learned how port became the drink of the upper classes (England was allied to Portugal at the time, with huge tariffs being put on Spanish and French goods), that Liverpool comprised just 24 streets in 1700, and that England had its own prohibition 200 years before America.

I could go on. Books like this are the reason I fell in love with history in the first place. I finished it and I want to know more. 10/10
 
Absolutely amazing, possibly the most captivating book I've ever read. Could not put it down.

It's such a contrast to his second book.
The 2nd book was such a let down after I Am Pilgrim.

It was like halfway through he decided to throw in a new idea he'd been thinking of but didn't have enough to it to write a full book about it.
 
I was in the mood for something out of the ordinary and was recommended The Fisherman by John Langan. It's a horror novel with supernatural elements. I went into it completely blind and only knew the name of the book and the genre. It's rather interesting with the way that it's put together as it's essentially in 3 parts...or rather, 2 parts, with one part split up and taking place at the beginning and end of the book with another section placed in the middle. Like a sandwich.

Part 1's opening premise is great. I found it to be very moving to hear Abe's story, and then there comes the extra kick when you read about Dan's story. I blitzed through this section quickly, but wasn't quite sure what the story was building up towards. It's very chill at times and it is interesting reading about the backstories of both characters and the local area. Then comes Part 2, where the 'horror' kicks in. Reading opinions online, it seems to be the case that part 2 is generally regarded as the "make it or break it" part for the reader. I personally found this entire section to be excellent and I was sucked in to it. Without spoiling too much, it ramps up the tension and introduces the new elements well in a way that doesn't feel cheap, particularly the introduction of "the guest" and then the even better re-introduction of Helen. My favourite character and I couldn't put the book down during her chapters. Part 2 is more than worthy of being the entire story itself.

Part 3 was satisfying and I enjoyed the final section, including the ending and where it ends up. But, it was my least favourite section of the book, mostly because I enjoyed the content of the first 2 parts more. Overall, I'd highly recommend it and can imagine revisiting this at some point in the future. It's being referred to as a modern classic and I'm very glad that I read this. Would recommend.
 
On a bit of a tear through American history the last few months. Trying to balance broad syntheses with the odd more specialized work thrown in. Here’s where I’m at so far:

American Colonies: The Settling of North America
by Alan Taylor

The Cause: The American Revolution and Its Discontents, 1773-1783
by Joseph J. Ellis

Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815
by Gordon S. Wood

The Peculiar Institution: Slavery in the Ante-Bellum South
by Kenneth M. Stampp

What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815–1848
by Daniel Walker Howe

Army of Manifest Destiny: The American Soldier in the Mexican War, 1846-1848
by James M. McCaffrey

Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era
by James M. McPherson

History of the American Frontier 1763-1893
by Frederic L. Paxson

and currently reading

Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877
by Eric Foner

I’m thinking of just dedicating the rest of my casual reading in 2025 to American history up to around the Second World War. After the Reconstruction period I have a feeling synthesis is more difficult to achieve, so I’m looking for more specific themes and topics to investigate. I have books on the history of New York, The Great Migration, and the Spanish-American War lined up, along with the autobiographies of Frederick Douglas and Malcolm X, but would welcome further suggestions here (some of the above were recommended to me previously on here). Would be especially interested in anything on the history of immigration up to the 1920s.
 
Great Britain and Europe in the 18th Century - David Bayne Horn

Another absolutely fantastic book that contains so much information that I had to re-read paragraphs and pages at times. My favourite period of history is Europe in the 19th century, a time of revolution, the modern beginning of ideas such as liberalism, democracy, so on, and the birth of many nation states, such as Italy and Germany.

Well, this is the prequel. The book basically documents Britain's relationship with each of the nations who play a part in the major events of the century: from the 'natural enemy' of France, to Austria, the Netherlands, the German states, Scandinavia, Russia, etc. Each is given its own chapter, and the author reveals how Britain's attitude to each changed over time.

At the beginning of the century, Britain's involvement in wars and alliances was almost entirely defensive: there was always the threat from France, due to their hegemony on land, their population (double that of GB), and the proximity of their coastline. Economically, the Dutch were big competiton, and Spain still played an important role, due to their American colonies and access to gold. Britain fought on the continent, but mainly used mercenaries purchased from the various German princes.

The end of the century saw British involvement in Europe based much more on their economic strength, the vastness of their dominions, and the dominance of their navy. They were much more 'meddling' and eager to use diplomacy to promote their own interests. The former Spanish and Dutch powerhouses were relegated to the second division, but France was still the main threat.

With British involvement in India playing a huge role in their economy and foreign policy, the centuries-long enmity between the Russians and the Ottomans came into sharper focus. Access to India via the Suez Canal meant that Britain was faced with difficult choices: they had traditionally been on good terms with Russia and traded with them for naval stores, but the Ottomans controllled Suez, via their satellite, Egypt. France had been the Ottomans' number one ally and trading partner for two centuries, so Britain was in a difficult spot at the end of the century.

I won't go on. Maybe nobody but me will read this book. It's over 60 years old, and you'd have to get it on Ebay or a specialist book store or something. But I love this kind of history. It's absolutely epic.

10/10
 
The War of the Flea - Robert Taber

"The guerrilla fights the war of the flea, and his military enemy suffers the dog's disadvantages; too much to defend, too small, ubiquitous, and agile an enemy to come to grips with."

This book was released in 1965, and is a treatise on modern guerilla warfare. It's a short one, at just under 200 pages, and I enjoyed reading it in the garden today while mulling over which power station I was going to sabotage in order to foment an uprising by the local population.

Taber was a reporter for CBS, and he was on first name terms with Fidel Castro, having covered the failed invasion of Cuba by the CIA at the Bay of Pigs. As such, he has a unique insight into what comprises guerilla war, and the reasons for its success or failure.

The book gives an overview of what guerilla warfare is in theory, and then devotes chapters to various insurgencies throughout the world, such as China, Vietnam (against both France and America), Cyprus, and so on.

The author takes the stance that, though guerilla action isn't always inevitable, even when there is a huge discrepancy between the haves and the have-nots, once it begins, it's incredibly difficult to stop. Not only that, but the oppressive regime or circumstances which brought about the insurrection, can only really succeed if they offer concessions to the population which undermine the justification for the guerrillas' actions in the first place. Trying to defeat guerrillas militarily is doomed to failure.

I thoroughly enjoyed it. It's rare for me to read a book from start to finish without a break, but the weather was lovely, the subject matter was interesting, and the author's style was very engaging. It's one of several hundred books I inherited when my Dad died in November, so I was very pleasantly surprised to discover that it's a signed first edition. It not only has sentimental value but may be worth a few bob, too.

Viva la revolución!

10/10
 
On a bit of a tear through American history the last few months. Trying to balance broad syntheses with the odd more specialized work thrown in. Here’s where I’m at so far:

American Colonies: The Settling of North America
by Alan Taylor

The Cause: The American Revolution and Its Discontents, 1773-1783
by Joseph J. Ellis

Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815
by Gordon S. Wood

The Peculiar Institution: Slavery in the Ante-Bellum South
by Kenneth M. Stampp

What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815–1848
by Daniel Walker Howe

Army of Manifest Destiny: The American Soldier in the Mexican War, 1846-1848
by James M. McCaffrey

Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era
by James M. McPherson

History of the American Frontier 1763-1893
by Frederic L. Paxson

and currently reading

Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877
by Eric Foner

I’m thinking of just dedicating the rest of my casual reading in 2025 to American history up to around the Second World War. After the Reconstruction period I have a feeling synthesis is more difficult to achieve, so I’m looking for more specific themes and topics to investigate. I have books on the history of New York, The Great Migration, and the Spanish-American War lined up, along with the autobiographies of Frederick Douglas and Malcolm X, but would welcome further suggestions here (some of the above were recommended to me previously on here). Would be especially interested in anything on the history of immigration up to the 1920s.
You can also find Foner's lecture series on Columbia's youtube channel, you can also find an online course version of it that includes a list of books about the Civil War and Reconstruction that might be interesting.
 
You can also find Foner's lecture series on Columbia's youtube channel, you can also find an online course version of it that includes a list of books about the Civil War and Reconstruction that might be interesting.

Thank you.

I think his Reconstruction is one of the most frustrating, infuriating books I’ve ever read. Not because of Foner, he’s great; but the subject matter.
 
Anyone got any good true crime/thrillers they can recommend?