Yep, always seemed like the obvious solution to me.I don't think away goals should be scrapped but I do think it's a completely unfair advantage that the away team in the second leg can score in extra time and it to be counted as an away goal. Both teams should have the away 'advantage' for the 90minutes and it should be reset if it goes to extra time.
The counter argument being that the home team has the unfair advantage of playing half an hour extra on their own turf in case of ET, which would no longer be compensated by the away goals law.I don't think away goals should be scrapped but I do think it's a completely unfair advantage that the away team in the second leg can score in extra time and it to be counted as an away goal. Both teams should have the away 'advantage' for the 90minutes and it should be reset if it goes to extra time.
Playing at home for the extra 30minutes is an intangible advantage and for quite a few teams (like United this season) it could be argued that it is a disadvantage. The 30minutes where your goals count for one more than your opponents is a clear and tangible advantage.The counter argument being that the home team has the unfair advantage of playing half an hour extra on their own turf in case of ET, which would no longer be compensated by the away goals law.
Extra time is great fun though.Scrap extra time altogether, or scrap draws(extra time+penalties in both legs)
Otherwise you inevitably give one team too big am advantage
how would penalties work on aggregate? the winner gets one extra goal?Scrap extra time altogether, or scrap draws(extra time+penalties in both legs)
Otherwise you inevitably give one team too big am advantage
It's not intangible, there's plenty of evidence out there to support that the home advantage is a very real thing. How it impacts each team individually and during a specific season is another matter, but on average it's a clear advantage.Playing at home for the extra 30minutes is an intangible advantage and for quite a few teams (like United this season) it could be argued that it is a disadvantage. The 30minutes where your goals count for one more than your opponents is a clear and tangible advantage.
Agreed. Honestly don't seen any reason to scrap the away goal ruleExtra time is great fun though.
No idea, not my job to figure it outhow would penalties work on aggregate? the winner gets one extra goal?
home ground advantage is intangible? WhatPlaying at home for the extra 30minutes is an intangible advantage and for quite a few teams (like United this season) it could be argued that it is a disadvantage. The 30minutes where your goals count for one more than your opponents is a clear and tangible advantage.
FairAgreed. Honestly don't seen any reason to scrap the away goal rule
No idea, not my job to figure it out
Disagree, playing at home is an obvious advantage, and this has long been accepted in football. Of course, I’m talking about stadiums full of fans, not the weirdness we currently have.Playing at home for the extra 30minutes is an intangible advantage and for quite a few teams (like United this season) it could be argued that it is a disadvantage. The 30minutes where your goals count for one more than your opponents is a clear and tangible advantage.
If a team is playing 19+ matches in a single stadium in a season, I'd expect them to be more comfortable playing in that stadium and have an advantage over the other team who probably only play there once every season. Just because United have been going against the flow, doesn't negate home advantage for a majority of the other teams.Playing at home for the extra 30minutes is an intangible advantage and for quite a few teams (like United this season) it could be argued that it is a disadvantage. The 30minutes where your goals count for one more than your opponents is a clear and tangible advantage.
Won't teams now just go back to boring defensive tactics when playing away?Thank feck. Stupid rule to begin with. So many teams robbed over it.
You're losing because your team score fewer goals away/conceded more goals at home. If they move away from away goals, I'd rather they decide results based on aggregate goals score than penalties, since that would force teams like Atletico to play for the win, both home and away, than grind out a draw once have a win in the first game.It annoys me that it counts in draws.
Say you draw 1-1 away and draw 2-2 at home. You get knocked out without actually losing.
They are not doing that already?Won't teams now just go back to boring defensive tactics when playing away?
Yes, this would be the most sensible solution. They had 180 minutes of football to find a winner, if they didn't, penalties are as good a way to decide as any, and much better than away goals in extra time and similar nonsense.Just go straight to pens or something.
Aggregate goals scored? Like, over the entire competition, or what?If they move away from away goals, I'd rather they decide results based on aggregate goals score than penalties, since that would force teams like Atletico to play for the win, both home and away, than grind out a draw once have a win in the first game.
Have you watched any penalty shootouts lately when there was no ET?Yes, this would be the most sensible solution. They had 180 minutes of football to find a winner, if they didn't, penalties are as good a way to decide as any, and much better than away goals in extra time and similar nonsense.
Clearly, penalty shootouts can go on for fecking ages even after 120 minutes - there was a quite recent example!Have you watched any penalty shootouts lately when there was no ET?
I can't remember which it was but I saw one in the last year. Nobody missed as they weren't fatigued. It went on for feckin ages.
I clearly had a brain f*rt thereAggregate goals scored? Like, over the entire competition, or what?
Because aggregate goals scored over a tie is very much how they are decided now. That's the primary method, in fact.