Moby
Dick
The biggest question mark for me is hoeness in that role.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Thanks for that CTP.I really rate Sindelar, too. In my write-up I had prepared a special plan to combat Sindelar as a false nine. The strong collective quality of my defence can deal with Sindelar as AM. I am happy and in control as long as he remains in front of my midfield line. By squeezing the space between that line and my back five I can reduce the area he is most dangerous in to a minimum. At a push Scirea or one of the side CBs (if they're closer) can step up and put him under pressure when he tries to receive the ball in that space.
I honestly feel very secure with my defensive set-up, and I don't think Joga would score once my defence is in a settled shape. I think by far the most dangerous situation for me is an unexpected loss of possession with my full backs caught up the pitch and Adams or Couto having to defend out wide against his wide strikers or midfielders.
I think that's fair enough with the defenders you have, especially Moore shouldn't be played too high up the pitch. For all his anticipation and positioning skills, he'll always come second in a race with Kluivert. Now, that alone isn't an issue.Defensive Line : Normal
. Pretty big fan of his, outside this draft even.I don't love David Villa (who does?)
Hmmm, I'd have Villa over Kluivert, Rummenigge over Elkjaer and Mazzola = Sindelar. Although one could argue that Sindelar was more pivotal in Austria's win in the CEIC as opposed to Mazzola's role in Italy '68 Euro triumph.Then again, in terms of pure quality, there's an argument to be made for ctp's trio. I rate Sindelar higher than most, I suspect, but the overall impression is nevertheless that ctp comes out on top here.
I'd just list out my players European Championship credentials. (Apologies if you've read some of these already, it's just convenient for me to list everything here for future references if I progress through.)Have to factor in the Euro versions of these players too – which makes it even harder to make a call.
I feel he has the tactical nous and the physical attributes to play such a role and I'm quite a big fan of him, needless to say. This is not the first time I've used him as a wide midfielder of sorts with a tucked in RCB either, in the manager draft he played a similar up-and-down wide role with Vogts as the tucked in RCB. Personally, I think he is in the Czibor, Conti, Nedved, Boniek class (not in quality but in playing style) whereby you could trust their dynamism, relentless running, tactical nous and their immense industry to man a flank as a box to box wide midfielder.The biggest question mark for me is hoeness in that role.
Yes, I was surprised by your decision to field a deep set-up. I was expecting a more evenly poised game in terms of momentum. Whilst it does present you with a nice counter-attacking threat, it could be dangerous to let the likes of Sindelar, Hoeneß, McM and Effenberg have the lion share of the ball esp against 2 fairly limited and rigid side CBs who won't be at their best in a back 3.However, you're also using your forward line to pressure my defenders, who, by the nature of my system, will be fairly deep inside my own half - and, as we've already established, I have ways to beat that line of pressure. After that, you're very open. Effenberg and Pluskal will have to cover a lot of space which will necessarily leave me with dangerous options.
You're exaggerating the effect of your pressing. Adams and Couto may not be the most cultured players around, but they're still professional footballers. They can find Scirea with a simple sideways pass. He can even drop back a little if the others are under so much pressure even the sideways ball is closed off.Yes, I was surprised by your decision to field a deep set-up. I was expecting a more evenly poised game in terms of momentum. Whilst it does present you with a nice counter-attacking threat, it could be dangerous to let the likes of Sindelar, Hoeneß, McM and Effenberg have the lion share of the ball esp against 2 fairly limited and rigid side CBs who won't be at their best in a back 3.
I still don't believe Adams and Couto will be able to cope with the pressure that Villa and Elkjaer will place on them though. They were extremely limited on the ball without really possessing a great touch, so to say and could be found wanting on the ball in back 3. Whilst my front trio will look to primarily put pressure on those 2 CBs, they will do it so in a coordinated manner and won't be going for gung-ho Rodgers like pressing tactics which would leave my midfield open. The main intention will be to cut off passing angles, harry them and limit their time on the ball to increase their likelihood of committing errors.
Elkjaer and Villa will put Couto and Adams under pressure. Sindelar will be the spare man who can keep track of Scirea's forward surges. Both your wing-backs will have my wide midfielders ahead of them relative to their positions. Naush and Ocwirk will have to contend with Effenberg and Pluskal before they can start spraying long passes all over the pitch. I don't see how you can establish a numerical superiority or cause any problems breaking through (provided Couto and Adams don't make an error on the ball) and like I've said earlier, it isn't a full on team press but rather just pressing focusing on your potential weak points, namely Couto and Adams.You're exaggerating the effect of your pressing. Adams and Couto may not be the most cultured players around, but they're still professional footballers. They can find Scirea with a simple sideways pass. He can even drop back a little if the others are under so much pressure even the sideways ball is closed off.
Still, you're left with the issue of me getting past that pressure. Your strikers way up the pitch, your defence can't come too far forward or you risk a ball over the top and a race between Kluivert and Moore, and your midfield is left stranded in the middle, stretched extremely thin.
That is exactly the issue I have with that tactic. You're pressing my centre backs, but you're not backing it up with a full press. You say Effenberg and Pluskal will focus on Nausch and Ocwirk, so you're leaving a big hole in behind those, where Mazzola and Rummenigge will run rampant.Elkjaer and Villa will put Couto and Adams under pressure. Sindelar will be the spare man who can keep track of Scirea's forward surges. Both your wing-backs will have my wide midfielders ahead of them relative to their positions. Naush and Ocwirk will have to contend with Effenberg and Pluskal before they can start spraying long passes all over the pitch. I don't see how you can establish a numerical superiority or cause any problems breaking through (provided Couto and Adams don't make an error on the ball) and like I've said earlier, it isn't a full on team press but rather just pressing focusing on your potential weak points, namely Couto and Adams.
You do not need a full on systematic press to back up 2 players putting pressure on your side centre backs.That is exactly the issue I have with that tactic. You're pressing my centre backs, but you're not backing it up with a full press. You say Effenberg and Pluskal will focus on Nausch and Ocwirk, so you're leaving a big hole in behind those, where Mazzola and Rummenigge will run rampant.
You are pressing Sindelar here with Scirea or one of your CBs but you are not exactly going to 'leave a huge hole behind' where Villa and Elkjaer 'run rampant' and neither do you need a full press to back it up.At a push Scirea or one of the side CBs (if they're closer) can step up and put him under pressure when he tries to receive the ball in that space.
Say you regain possession or the ball is in your back line. Villa and Elkjaer will look to apply pressure on Couto and Adams. The best case scenario for your team is they play a simple square ball to either Scirea (who will have Sindelar in his zone and won't be free to burst forward at ease) or to one of your FBs (who will have my wide midfielders to contend with). The worst case would be when they muck up their first touch or misplace a ball which is exactly what I'm hoping to achieve.However, you're also using your forward line to pressure my defenders, who, by the nature of my system, will be fairly deep inside my own half - and, as we've already established, I have ways to beat that line of pressure. After that, you're very open. Effenberg and Pluskal will have to cover a lot of space which will necessarily leave me with dangerous options.
Either you're giving Ocwirk and Nausch a lot of time to pick their passes
Me. One of my favourite non-Utd players of recent times. And her hopefully:Close as hell, really.
I like both teams and I have no real issues with the way they're set up either.
I'm not sold on that Couto-Scirea-Adams trio, though.
Nor am I sold on McManaman and Hoeneß on the flanks in those roles.
Joga's defensive trio is fearsome – absolutely fearsome. And I think they would work just like he wants 'em to.
I love his attacking trio too – well, I don't love David Villa (who does?) but he'd be very good in that combo.
Then again, in terms of pure quality, there's an argument to be made for ctp's trio. I rate Sindelar higher than most, I suspect, but the overall impression is nevertheless that ctp comes out on top here.
Have to factor in the Euro versions of these players too – which makes it even harder to make a call.
Have to come back to this one, I think.
Agree with all of these points.Close as hell, really.
I like both teams and I have no real issues with the way they're set up either.
I'm not sold on that Couto-Scirea-Adams trio, though.
Nor am I sold on McManaman and Hoeneß on the flanks in those roles.
Joga's defensive trio is fearsome – absolutely fearsome. And I think they would work just like he wants 'em to.
I love his attacking trio too – well, I don't love David Villa (who does?) but he'd be very good in that combo.
Then again, in terms of pure quality, there's an argument to be made for ctp's trio. I rate Sindelar higher than most, I suspect, but the overall impression is nevertheless that ctp comes out on top here.
Have to factor in the Euro versions of these players too – which makes it even harder to make a call.
Have to come back to this one, I think.
done.Tactical change - Demyanenko comes on for McM.
Aye, it was one of the main reasons why I decided to go for industrious wide midfielders instead of wing-backs as I believed the quality of my back 3 could have made me pull off a high risk-high profit move. However, the reception hasn't been all that great . It is justified to a certain extent as they are up against two top notch wing-backs in Gerets and Lizarazu but I think their attacking out-put (esp since it's been established that I will have control over proceeding here) has been underrated imo.I'm not hugely bothered by McManaman and Hoeneß in those roles due to the quality of Joga's defenders.
Good to know, don't feel compelled to change your vote though as it would be unfair on ctp.I prefer Joga's team with this change
Agree with these points. Demyanenko was a machine down that flank for Kiev and the USSR.Anyway, with the sub of Demyanenko I don't lose much offensively (some might even rank his wingsmanship and attacking contributions over McM relative to how they rate both of them) and gain so much more defensively. Hoeneß is freed up offensively
Good move. I wasn't a huge fan of McManaman on the left side with defensive duties, and giving Hoeness more freedom is a brilliant move. I watched quite a bit of him whilst browsing through Netzer vieos and he was a brilliant player who was at his best attacking the penalty area.Tactical change - Demyanenko comes on for McM.
Hoeneß has more freedom offensively on the right with Bergomi playing as a RCB. Demyanenko provides plenty of width and attacking impetus down the left flank but provides more security and defensive nous whilst being better able to shackle Gerets forays forward.
I think we've talked enough about the shortcomings of my centre backs. I think it's time we talked about the negatives to your set-up, and I don't even mean Hoeneß and Bananaman as your wide midfielders. No, this is tactical!
Of course he did, I'm not disputing that. There was a group of 4 players in that Euro that stood out for me, but Kalle stood out the whole year, dominating both on a club and international level, unlike his competitors.Kalle absolutely deserved winning it by a landslide.
I do agree Gerets's influence grew over the decade and that it is a bit exaggerated to refer to him as #2 to Ceulemans in 1980.
good. i'll try to analyse it tomorrow, but demyanenko is a great change anywayTactical change - Demyanenko comes on for McM.
Hoeneß has more freedom offensively on the right with Bergomi playing as a RCB. Demyanenko provides plenty of width and attacking impetus down the left flank but provides more security and defensive nous whilst being better able to shackle Gerets forays forward.
@Balu
Absolutely massive swap. Lizarazu was always going to be doing more traditional fullback work but that combination between Gerets and Kalle works beautifully in a way not even Maldini can stop.Tactical change - Demyanenko comes on for McM.
Hoeneß has more freedom offensively on the right with Bergomi playing as a RCB. Demyanenko provides plenty of width and attacking impetus down the left flank but provides more security and defensive nous whilst being better able to shackle Gerets forays forward.
@Balu
I refer you to post 44 above. He had a good tourno individually and England could have very well made the final and won the whole damn thing, had it not been for injuries, tactical blunders by Sir Alf Ramsey and a misfiring English forward line. Still, Moore excelled individually as England came 3rd (their highest position ever in Euros) and had a stormer of a game against the Soviet, a particularly strong team in that era and they had an excellent record in the Euros (From 1960 to 1972 they made 3 finals, could have made the final in '68 had it not been for a coin toss as well) to back it up.EDIT: He's up against a formidable backline though and he doesn't really present any unique quality that they'd struggle to deal with imo. I wouldn't fancy Moore beating him in the air but he's got ample support. Maldini and Bergomi's Euro form was good, but how does Moore's stack up? I haven't watched any of his Euros campaign.
Can't believe you had Demyanenko on the bench while Mc Mananananamanaman was prancing around the pitch leaving you brutally exposed.
It was 9-8 when I logged off with ctp in the lead. All part of the plan Balu. Put in a Space Goat (Bananaman) initially, to cop all the negative scrutiny and then halfway through the match, sub out said space goat and make your team look twice the team that it was initially.Wow, the slightly change made all the difference for Joga. He walked the game after he subbed Demyanenko in. If I remember correctly ctp was 8-7 in the lead when I went to bed last night .
Thanks.and good luck in the next round!
Good to know mate. Great game and you really did construct a terrific team.I'll be in a good mood today regardless, because I just managed to get tickets for the Bayern away game at the last day of the season.
It is indeed, but your biggest problem was Kalle-Gerets on the break with Bananaman jogging back half-heartedly (in comparison to how Demyanenko would act).On a more serious note, the scoreline is overly harsh on ctp. Should have been much closer
. Pretty big fan of his, outside this draft even.
Well, why do we dislike anyone we don't know? He's always struck me as a bit of twat, that's all. Probably hugely unfair on the poor bastard, but there it is.Why do you dislike him?
Fair point!Well, why do we dislike anyone we don't know? He's always struck me as a bit of twat, that's all. Probably hugely unfair on the poor bastard, but there it is.
And as a player – well, he was very good, naturally, and I respect that. But for me he wasn't the sort of the player you'd take a shine to – I don't think I can explain it beyond this, it's pretty irrational, as most likes and dislikes in football are at the end of the day.
Oh, all right then. I misunderstood it as you not liking the player (type/quality etc) that he was instead of the individual himself. Anyway, I always found him to be a bit of the reserved type and not the type of character who you'd really take to as a person nor have strong enough feelings to dislike then. I'd admit though, I do find his patch of beard under the lip (does it qualify for a goatee?) a bit annoying.Well, why do we dislike anyone we don't know? He's always struck me as a bit of twat, that's all. Probably hugely unfair on the poor bastard, but there it is.
And as a player – well, he was very good, naturally, and I respect that. But for me he wasn't the sort of the player you'd take a shine to – I don't think I can explain it beyond this, it's pretty irrational, as most likes and dislikes in football are at the end of the day.
There you go! That's precisely the sort of thing. I mean, who sports that sort of neither-here-nor-there facial hair? Clearly a cnut.I'd admit though, I do find his patch of beard under the lip (does it qualify for a goatee?) a bit annoying.
There you go! That's precisely the sort of thing. I mean, who sports that sort of neither-here-nor-there facial hair? Clearly a cnut.
Yeah, that's more like it. Still, pretty cnutish grin – and what's up with that hairline? Nah, he's a congenital cnut, clearly so.
You'd prefer this then
Christ... The transformation (apparently this was him when he was 19 )
Ok I give upYeah, that's more like it. Still, pretty cnutish grin – and what's up with that hairline? Nah, he's a congenital cnut, clearly so.
Aye – he has that going for him.I'm with Pat on Villa. He basically dragged Spain to that World Cup in 2010 as their only player to actually have the temerity to score goals.